841c9ac92e
Phase 1: Git Repository Audit (4 Agents, 2,438 files)
- GLOBAL_VISION_REPORT.md - Master audit synthesis (health score 8/10)
- ARCHAEOLOGIST_REPORT.md - Roadmap reconstruction (3 phases, no abandonments)
- INSPECTOR_REPORT.md - Wiring analysis (9/10, zero broken imports)
- SEGMENTER_REPORT.md - Functionality matrix (6/6 core features complete)
- GITEA_SYNC_STATUS_REPORT.md - Sync gap analysis (67 commits behind)
Phase 2: Multi-Environment Audit (3 Agents, 991 files)
- LOCAL_FILESYSTEM_ARTIFACTS_REPORT.md - 949 files scanned, 27 ghost files
- STACKCP_REMOTE_ARTIFACTS_REPORT.md - 14 deployment files, 12 missing from Git
- WINDOWS_DOWNLOADS_ARTIFACTS_REPORT.md - 28 strategic docs recovered
- PHASE_2_DELTA_REPORT.md - Cross-environment delta analysis
Remediation Kit (3 Agents)
- restore_chaos.sh - Master recovery script (1,785 lines, 23 functions)
- test_search_wiring.sh - Integration test suite (10 comprehensive tests)
- ELECTRICIAN_INDEX.md - Wiring fixes documentation
- REMEDIATION_COMMANDS.md - CLI command reference
Redis Knowledge Base
- redis_ingest.py - Automated ingestion (397 lines)
- forensic_surveyor.py - Filesystem scanner with Redis integration
- REDIS_INGESTION_*.md - Complete usage documentation
- Total indexed: 3,432 artifacts across 4 namespaces (1.43 GB)
Dockerfile Updates
- Enabled wkhtmltopdf for PDF export
- Multi-stage Alpine Linux build
- Health check endpoint configured
Security Updates
- Updated .env.example with comprehensive variable documentation
- server/index.js modified for api_search route integration
Audit Summary:
- Total files analyzed: 3,429
- Total execution time: 27 minutes
- Agents deployed: 7 (4 Phase 1 + 3 Phase 2)
- Health score: 8/10 (production ready)
- No lost work detected
- No abandoned features
- Zero critical blockers
Launch Status: APPROVED for December 10, 2025
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
178 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
178 lines
4.9 KiB
Markdown
# InfraFabric Evaluation - Quick Start
|
|
|
|
## TL;DR
|
|
|
|
**Goal:** Get brutal, comparable feedback from 3 AI evaluators (Codex, Gemini, Claude) on InfraFabric
|
|
|
|
**Time:** 3-6 hours (evaluations run in parallel)
|
|
|
|
**Output:** Consensus report showing what all evaluators agree on
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3-Step Process
|
|
|
|
### Step 1: Copy Prompt (5 seconds)
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
cat /home/setup/navidocs/INFRAFABRIC_EVAL_PASTE_PROMPT.txt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Step 2: Paste into 3 Sessions (3-6 hours total, run in parallel)
|
|
|
|
1. **Codex session** → Save output as `codex_infrafabric_eval_2025-11-14.yaml`
|
|
2. **Gemini session** → Save output as `gemini_infrafabric_eval_2025-11-14.yaml`
|
|
3. **Claude Code session** → Save output as `claude_infrafabric_eval_2025-11-14.yaml`
|
|
|
|
### Step 3: Merge Results (10 seconds)
|
|
|
|
```bash
|
|
cd /home/setup/navidocs
|
|
./merge_evaluations.py codex_*.yaml gemini_*.yaml claude_*.yaml
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Output:** `INFRAFABRIC_CONSENSUS_REPORT.md`
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What You'll Get
|
|
|
|
### 1. Score Consensus
|
|
```yaml
|
|
overall_score: 6.5/10 (average across 3 evaluators)
|
|
variance: 0.25 (low variance = high agreement)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. IF.* Component Status
|
|
```
|
|
IF.guard: ✅ Implemented (3/3 agree, 73% complete)
|
|
IF.citate: ✅ Implemented (3/3 agree, 58% complete)
|
|
IF.sam: 🟡 Partial (3/3 agree - has design, no code)
|
|
IF.swarm: ❌ Vaporware (2/3 agree - mentioned but no spec)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Critical Issues (Ranked by Consensus)
|
|
```
|
|
P0: API keys exposed (3/3 evaluators - 100% consensus) - 1 hour fix
|
|
P0: No authentication (3/3 evaluators - 100% consensus) - 3-5 days
|
|
P1: IF.sam not implemented (3/3 evaluators - 100% consensus) - 1-2 weeks
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 4. Buyer Persona Fit
|
|
```
|
|
1. Academic AI Safety: Fit 7.7/10, WTP 3.3/10 (loves it, won't pay)
|
|
2. Enterprise Governance: Fit 6.0/10, WTP 7.0/10 (will pay if production-ready)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Why This Works
|
|
|
|
✅ **YAML format** → Easy to diff, merge, filter programmatically
|
|
✅ **Mandatory schema** → All evaluators use same structure
|
|
✅ **Quantified scores** → No vague assessments, everything is 0-10 or percentage
|
|
✅ **Consensus ranking** → Focus on what all evaluators agree on first
|
|
✅ **File citations** → Every finding links to `file:line` for traceability
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Files Reference
|
|
|
|
| File | Size | Purpose |
|
|
|------|------|---------|
|
|
| `INFRAFABRIC_EVAL_PASTE_PROMPT.txt` | 9.4KB | Paste this into Codex/Gemini/Claude |
|
|
| `INFRAFABRIC_COMPREHENSIVE_EVALUATION_PROMPT.md` | 15KB | Full methodology (reference) |
|
|
| `merge_evaluations.py` | 8.9KB | Merges YAML outputs |
|
|
| `EVALUATION_WORKFLOW_README.md` | 6.6KB | Detailed workflow guide |
|
|
| `EVALUATION_QUICKSTART.md` | This file | Quick reference |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Expected Timeline
|
|
|
|
| Phase | Duration | Parallelizable? |
|
|
|-------|----------|-----------------|
|
|
| Start 3 evaluation sessions | 1 minute | Yes |
|
|
| Wait for evaluations to complete | 3-6 hours | Yes (all 3 run simultaneously) |
|
|
| Download YAML files | 2 minutes | No |
|
|
| Run merger | 10 seconds | No |
|
|
| Review consensus report | 15-30 minutes | No |
|
|
| **Total elapsed time** | **3-6 hours** | (mostly waiting) |
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Troubleshooting
|
|
|
|
**Q: Evaluator isn't following YAML format**
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Show them the schema again (it's in the prompt)
|
|
grep -A 100 "YAML Schema:" INFRAFABRIC_EVAL_PASTE_PROMPT.txt
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Q: Merger script fails**
|
|
```bash
|
|
# Check YAML syntax
|
|
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('codex_eval.yaml'))"
|
|
|
|
# Install PyYAML if needed
|
|
pip install pyyaml
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Q: Want to see just P0 blockers**
|
|
```bash
|
|
grep -A 5 "P0 Blockers" INFRAFABRIC_CONSENSUS_REPORT.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## What to Do with Results
|
|
|
|
### Priority 1: 100% Consensus P0 Blockers
|
|
- **Everyone agrees these are critical**
|
|
- Fix immediately before anything else
|
|
|
|
### Priority 2: IF.* Components (Vaporware → Implemented)
|
|
- Components all 3 evaluators flagged as vaporware = remove from docs or build
|
|
- Components all 3 flagged as partial = finish implementation
|
|
|
|
### Priority 3: Market Focus
|
|
- Buyer persona with highest `fit_score * willingness_to_pay` = your target customer
|
|
- Ignore personas with high fit but low WTP (interesting but won't make money)
|
|
|
|
### Priority 4: Documentation Cleanup
|
|
- Issues with 100% consensus on docs = definitely fix
|
|
- Issues with <67% consensus = might be evaluator bias, investigate
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Next Session Prompt
|
|
|
|
After you have the consensus report, create a debug session:
|
|
|
|
```markdown
|
|
# InfraFabric Debug Session
|
|
|
|
Based on consensus evaluation from Codex, Gemini, and Claude (2025-11-14):
|
|
|
|
**P0 Blockers (100% consensus):**
|
|
1. API keys exposed in docs (1 hour fix)
|
|
2. No authentication system (3-5 days)
|
|
|
|
**IF.* Components to implement:**
|
|
1. IF.sam (design exists, no code - 1-2 weeks)
|
|
2. [...]
|
|
|
|
Please implement fixes in priority order, starting with P0s.
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Key Insight
|
|
|
|
**Focus on 100% consensus findings first.**
|
|
|
|
If all 3 evaluators (different architectures, different training data, different biases) independently flag the same issue → it's real and important.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
**Ready to get brutally honest feedback. Copy the prompt and run 3 evaluations in parallel.**
|