Applied all 5 critical fixes from SESSION_DEBUG_BLOCKERS.md: 1. ✅ Price range corrected: €250K-€480K → €800K-€1.5M - Updated CLOUD_SESSION_1_MARKET_RESEARCH.md - Updated CLOUD_SESSION_3_UX_SALES_ENABLEMENT.md 2. ✅ Sunseeker brand added to target market - Added to CLOUD_SESSION_1_MARKET_RESEARCH.md 3. ✅ Session 2 dependency documented - Agent 1 must complete before Agents 2-9 4. ✅ Session 4 week dependencies documented - Agents 1→2→3→4 sequential (week by week) 5. ✅ Session execution order guide created - New file: SESSION_EXECUTION_ORDER.md Files modified: 6 All P0 blockers resolved Ready for cloud session launch
17 KiB
Cloud Session 2: Technical Integration Architecture
NaviDocs Yacht Sales Enhancement Roadmap
Session Type: Technical Integration Specialist Lead Agent: Sonnet (architecture + development) Swarm Size: 10 Haiku agents Token Budget: $20 (10K Sonnet + 60K Haiku) Output: Feature specs + integration architecture + sprint plan
Mission Statement
Design technical architecture for sticky daily-use features (inventory tracking, cameras, maintenance logs, contacts, accounting) that make NaviDocs indispensable to recreational boat owners. Documentation features are secondary to engagement.
Context (Read First)
Prerequisites:
- Read
intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md - Read
intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md - Read
/home/setup/navidocs/ARCHITECTURE_INTEGRATION_ANALYSIS.md(if accessible)
Current NaviDocs Tech Stack:
- Frontend: Vue 3 + Vite
- Backend: Express.js + SQLite
- Background: BullMQ + Redis
- Search: Meilisearch
- OCR: Tesseract + Google Vision
- Auth: JWT + bcrypt
Critical Feature Gaps (from Session 1):
- No inventory tracking (€15K-€50K forgotten value at resale)
- No camera/monitoring integration (owners want "is my boat OK?" reassurance)
- No maintenance log (when was last engine service? upcoming work alerts?)
- No contact management (crew, marina, mechanics, cleaners)
- No expense tracking (how much am I spending on this boat?)
- No impeccable search (avoid long lists, structured faceted results)
Agent Identity & Check-In Protocol
YOU ARE: Sonnet coordinator for Session 2 (Technical Architecture)
YOUR HAIKU SWARM: You have 10 Haiku agents available. Use as many as needed (not required to use all 10).
AGENT IDENTITY SYSTEM:
When spawning a Haiku agent, assign it an identity: S2-H01 through S2-H10
Each agent MUST:
- Check in at start: "I am S2-H03, assigned to [task name]"
- Reference their task by searching this document for "Agent 3:" (matching their number)
- Retain identity throughout execution
- Report completion with identity: "S2-H03 complete: [deliverable summary]"
TASK DEPENDENCIES:
- CRITICAL: Agent 1 (Codebase Analysis) MUST complete FIRST
- Agents 2-9 run in parallel AFTER Agent 1 completes
- Agent 10 (synthesis) waits for Agents 2-9
Execution Phases:
-
Phase 1 (Sequential): Agent 1 - NaviDocs codebase analysis
- Maps existing database schema, API patterns, business logic
- Identifies integration points for feature designs
- BLOCKS: All feature design agents until complete
-
Phase 2 (Parallel): Agents 2-9 - Feature design & architecture
- Agent 2: Inventory Tracking System
- Agent 3: Maintenance Log & Reminders
- Agent 4: Camera & Remote Monitoring
- Agent 5: Contact Management
- Agent 6: Expense Tracking & Accounting
- Agent 7: Impeccable Search UX
- Agent 8: Notification System
- Agent 9: Database Migration Plan
- Dependency: All depend on Agent 1 codebase analysis
- Communication: Agents use IF.bus to validate designs against Agent 1 findings
-
Phase 3 (Final): Agent 10 - Sprint planning & synthesis
- Compiles results from Agents 2-9
- Maps inter-feature dependencies
- Creates integrated 4-week sprint plan
- Dependency: Waits for Agents 2-9 completion
Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
Agent 1: NaviDocs Codebase Analysis
AGENT ID: S2-H01 ** Read Files:
server/db/schema.sql- Database structureserver/routes/*.js- API endpointsserver/services/*.js- Business logicserver/workers/*.js- Background jobs
Deliverable: Architecture map with integration points
Agent 2: Inventory Tracking System Design (CRITICAL)
AGENT ID: S2-H02 ** Design:
- Database schema:
boat_inventory(item_name, category, zone, purchase_date, purchase_price, receipt_url, warranty_expiration, current_value) - Categories: tender/zodiac, electronics, engine, deck, interior, safety
- Zones: salon, galley, helm, engine room, stern storage
- OCR receipt extraction (auto-populate item, price, date)
- Resale value calculator (total upgrades since purchase)
- Search facets (by category, zone, value range, warranty status)
Deliverable: Inventory tracking spec with impeccable search UX
Agent 3: Maintenance Log & Reminder System
AGENT ID: S2-H03 ** Design:
- Database schema:
maintenance_log(service_type, date, cost, provider, next_due_date, engine_hours) - Service types: engine, electronics, hull, deck, safety equipment
- Reminder alerts (based on date OR engine hours)
- Service provider contacts (auto-suggest from past services)
- Expense rollup (total maintenance spend YTD, annual)
Deliverable: Maintenance tracking spec with smart reminders
Agent 4: Camera & Remote Monitoring Integration (STICKY!)
AGENT ID: S2-H04 ** Research + Design:
- Home Assistant camera feed integration (Hikvision, Reolink, marine cameras)
- Webhook architecture (NaviDocs ← HA events: motion detected, battery low, bilge alert)
- Camera snapshot storage (link to boat, timestamp, auto-cleanup old images)
- Mobile-first UI (owners check from phone: "is my boat OK?")
- Use cases: security monitoring, dock check, weather damage assessment
Deliverable: Camera/HA integration architecture with peace-of-mind UX
Agent 5: Contact Management System
AGENT ID: S2-H05 ** Design:
- Database schema:
boat_contacts(name, role, phone, email, notes, last_used) - Roles: marina, mechanic, cleaner, charter crew, electrician, surveyor
- One-tap call/email from mobile
- Auto-suggest from maintenance log (provider → contact)
- Quick actions: "Call my mechanic", "Email charter crew"
Deliverable: Contact management spec with mobile-first UX
Agent 6: Expense Tracking & Accounting
AGENT ID: S2-H06 ** Design:
- Database schema: expense tracking across inventory, maintenance, marina fees
- Expense categories (maintenance, upgrades, insurance, marina, fuel, crew)
- Annual/monthly rollups (how much is this boat costing me?)
- Budget alerts ("You've spent €15K this year, €3K over budget")
- Tax deduction report (for chartered boats)
Deliverable: Expense tracking spec with budget management
Agent 7: Impeccable Search UX Design (CRITICAL)
AGENT ID: S2-H07 ** Design:
- Search architecture (Meilisearch faceted search)
- Structured results (NO long lists - Pinterest/Airbnb grid layout)
- Facets: category, zone, value range, warranty status, date range
- Mobile-first (owners search from phone)
- Voice search support ("Show me tender warranty")
- Quick filters: "Show expensive items", "Show expiring warranties"
Deliverable: Search UX spec with visual mockups (avoid long lists!)
Agent 8: Notification System Design
AGENT ID: S2-H08 ** Design:
- Email notification service
- SMS alerts (warranty expiration, document missing)
- In-app notification center
- Push notifications (PWA)
Deliverable: Notification architecture with templates
Agent 9: Database Migration Plan
AGENT ID: S2-H09 ** Create:
- Migration scripts for warranty tracking
- Charter mode fields (flag, crew, safety)
- Expiration tracking tables
- Collaboration features schema
Deliverable: SQL migrations + rollback scripts
Agent 10: Sprint Planning
AGENT ID: S2-H10 ** Compile:
- Week 1-4 task breakdown
- Dependencies mapped (e.g., DB migrations before API work)
- Acceptance criteria per feature
- Testing strategy (unit, integration, E2E)
Deliverable: 4-week sprint plan with Gantt chart
Intra-Agent Communication Protocol (IF.bus)
Based on: InfraFabric S² multi-swarm coordination (3,563x faster than git polling)
IFMessage Schema
Every agent-to-agent message follows this structure:
{
"performative": "inform", // FIPA-ACL: inform, request, query-if, confirm, disconfirm, propose, agree, ESCALATE
"sender": "if://agent/session-2/haiku-Y",
"receiver": ["if://agent/session-2/haiku-Z"],
"conversation_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-session-2-2025-11-13",
"content": {
"claim": "[Your design proposal]",
"evidence": ["[File references or codebase analysis]"],
"confidence": 0.85, // 0.0-1.0
"cost_tokens": 1247
},
"citation_ids": ["if://citation/uuid"],
"timestamp": "2025-11-13T10:00:00Z",
"sequence_num": 1
}
Speech Acts (Performatives)
propose: Agent suggests a design or approach
- Example: "S2-H02 proposes: Inventory tracking via manual entry forms"
agree: Agent validates another agent's proposal
- Example: "S2-H04 agrees with S2-H02: Manual entry compatible with camera feeds"
disconfirm: Agent challenges another agent's design
- Example: "S2-H04 challenges S2-H02: Camera feeds can auto-detect equipment (CV models available)"
request: Ask another agent for design input
- Example: "S2-H02 requests S2-H04: How do cameras integrate with inventory schema?"
confirm: Validate another agent's technical claim
- Example: "S2-H01 confirms S2-H03: Express.js patterns match existing routes"
ESCALATE: Flag critical integration conflicts
- Example: "S2-H10 ESCALATES: Inventory + cameras overlap, needs integration design"
Communication Flow (This Session)
S2-H01 (Codebase) ──→ S2-H10
S2-H02 (Inventory) ──→ S2-H04 (Cameras) ─→ S2-H10 (peer review)
S2-H03 (Maintenance) → S2-H05 (Contacts) → S2-H10 (integration check)
S2-H06 (Expense) ────→ S2-H07 (Search UX)→ S2-H10
Key Patterns:
- Design Proposals: Agents 2-7 propose features independently
- Peer Review: Adjacent agents challenge/validate designs
- Integration Checks: Agent 10 ensures no conflicts between subsystems
- Sonnet Approval: Final architecture review & synthesis
Cross-Domain Validation Example
# Agent 2 (Inventory Tracking) proposes design
S2-H02: "propose" → content:
feature: "Inventory tracking via manual entry forms"
rationale: "Simple, no OCR complexity"
# Agent 4 (Cameras) challenges with technical capability
S2-H04: "disconfirm" → content:
original_proposal: "Manual entry only"
challenge: "Camera feeds can auto-detect equipment (tender, electronics) via CV"
evidence: ["OpenCV boat equipment detection models"]
alternative: "Hybrid: Manual + camera-assisted auto-detection"
# Agent 2 revises proposal
S2-H02: "agree" → content:
revised_proposal: "Inventory tracking: Manual entry + camera-assisted CV detection"
integration_point: "Use S2-H04's camera feed for equipment detection"
API Integration Conflict Example
# Agent 3 (Maintenance) proposes maintenance log API
S2-H03: "propose" → POST /api/maintenance/{boat_id}/logs
# Agent 7 (Search UX) challenges completeness
S2-H07: "query-if" → content:
question: "Does maintenance API support date-range queries for yearly reporting?"
reasoning: "Search UI needs to filter by date for expense rollups"
# Agent 3 confirms and extends API
S2-H03: "confirm" → content:
api_extended: "GET /api/maintenance/{boat_id}/logs?start_date=&end_date=&category="
integration: "Supports S2-H06 expense rollup queries"
IF.TTT Compliance
Every message MUST include:
- citation_ids: Links to design docs, codebase references
- confidence: Explicit score (0.0-1.0)
- evidence: File:line references from NaviDocs codebase
- cost_tokens: Token consumption (IF.optimise tracking)
IF.bus Integration Pattern
Event Bus Design
// server/services/event-bus.js
class EventBus {
async publish(topic, event) {
// Publish to Redis pub/sub
// Trigger webhooks (Home Assistant)
// Queue background jobs
// Log to audit trail
}
async subscribe(topic, handler) {
// Subscribe to Redis channel
// Handle incoming events
}
}
// Topics for NaviDocs
const TOPICS = {
WARRANTY_EXPIRING: 'warranty.expiring',
DOCUMENT_UPLOADED: 'document.uploaded',
SALE_INITIATED: 'sale.initiated',
BOAT_TRANSFERRED: 'boat.transferred'
};
Webhook Framework
// server/services/webhook.service.js
class WebhookService {
async sendWebhook(url, event) {
// POST event to external system
// Retry on failure (exponential backoff)
// Log delivery status
}
async registerWebhook(organizationId, url, topics) {
// Store webhook subscription
// Validate URL reachability
}
}
Output Format
Deliverable 1: Technical Architecture Document
File: session-2-architecture.md
Structure:
# NaviDocs Yacht Sales Technical Architecture
## System Overview
[High-level architecture diagram]
## Database Schema Changes
[Agent 9: Migration scripts]
## API Endpoints (New)
### Warranty Tracking
- POST /api/warranties
- GET /api/warranties/:id
- PUT /api/warranties/:id
- DELETE /api/warranties/:id
- GET /api/warranties/expiring
### Sale Workflow
- POST /api/sales
- GET /api/sales/:id/documents
- POST /api/sales/:id/transfer
### Webhooks
- POST /api/webhooks/register
- GET /api/webhooks
- DELETE /api/webhooks/:id
## Integration Architecture
### Home Assistant
[Agent 4: Webhook + MQTT design]
### MLS Platforms
[Agent 6: API contracts]
### Notification System
[Agent 8: Email/SMS/Push architecture]
## Security Remediation
[Agent 7: Security fixes]
## Offline Mode
[Agent 5: PWA caching strategy]
## 4-Week Sprint Plan
[Agent 10: Gantt chart + tasks]
Deliverable 2: Implementation Tasks
File: session-2-sprint-plan.md
Structure:
# 4-Week Implementation Sprint
## Week 1: Foundation (Nov 13-19)
### Day 1-2: Database Migrations
- [ ] Create warranty_tracking table
- [ ] Create sale_workflows table
- [ ] Create webhooks table
- [ ] Create notification_templates table
### Day 3-4: Event Bus
- [ ] Implement IF.bus service
- [ ] Create webhook delivery system
- [ ] Add Redis pub/sub
### Day 5: Security Fixes
- [ ] Protect DELETE endpoints
- [ ] Enforce auth on all routes
- [ ] Fix stats endpoint (tenant isolation)
## Week 2: Core Integrations (Nov 20-26)
### Day 1-2: Warranty Tracking
- [ ] Warranty CRUD APIs
- [ ] Expiration alert background job
- [ ] Claim package generator
### Day 3-5: Home Assistant
- [ ] Webhook receiver endpoint
- [ ] MQTT broker integration
- [ ] Camera system connector
## Week 3: Automation (Nov 27 - Dec 3)
### Day 1-2: Sale Workflow
- [ ] As-built package generator
- [ ] Document transfer API
- [ ] Buyer handoff workflow
### Day 3-4: Notifications
- [ ] Email service implementation
- [ ] SMS gateway integration
- [ ] In-app notification center
### Day 5: Offline Mode
- [ ] Service worker caching
- [ ] Offline sync queue
## Week 4: Polish & Deploy (Dec 4-10)
### Day 1-2: MLS Integration
- [ ] YachtWorld API connector
- [ ] Boat Trader sync
### Day 3: Testing
- [ ] E2E test suite
- [ ] Security audit
- [ ] Performance testing
### Day 4-5: Deployment
- [ ] Sales demo environment
- [ ] Production deployment
- [ ] Riviera Plaisance pilot
Deliverable 3: Code Templates
File: session-2-code-templates/
Files:
warranty.model.js- Warranty database modelwarranty.routes.js- API endpointswarranty.service.js- Business logicwebhook.service.js- Webhook deliveryevent-bus.service.js- IF.bus implementationnotification.service.js- Alert system
Deliverable 4: Session Handoff
File: session-2-handoff.md
Structure:
# Session 2 Handoff to Session 3
## Mission Accomplished
- [x] Architecture designed
- [x] Sprint plan created
- [x] Code templates generated
- [x] Security audit complete
## Key Findings for Session 3 (UX/Sales)
1. Warranty tracking saves €8K-€33K per yacht (ROI calculator input)
2. Home Assistant integration enables remote monitoring
3. 4-week implementation timeline (Week 1: Foundation, Week 4: Deploy)
4. Security fixes required before demo (DELETE endpoint, auth)
## Blockers for Next Session
- [ ] Need UI/UX mockups for warranty dashboard (Session 3)
- [ ] Sales pitch requires demo script (Session 3)
## Token Consumption
- Total: 62,800 tokens ($1.42)
- Sonnet: 9,500 tokens
- Haiku: 53,300 tokens
- Efficiency: 68% Haiku delegation ✅
## Evidence Quality
- Code templates: 6 files created
- API endpoints: 15 new routes documented
- Migrations: 4 SQL scripts ready
- All architecture verified against NaviDocs codebase
## Next Session Input
Read: session-2-architecture.md, session-2-sprint-plan.md
Focus: Sales pitch, demo script, ROI calculator, objection handling
IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
- All code templates include file:line references
- API specs link to NaviDocs existing endpoints
- Database migrations tested (rollback verified)
- Security audit cites OWASP Top 10
- Sprint plan has acceptance criteria per task
- Evidence artifacts stored in
/intelligence/session-2/
Success Criteria
Minimum Viable Output:
- Database migrations for warranty tracking
- 4-week sprint plan with dependencies
- Home Assistant integration architecture
- Security remediation plan (5 vulnerabilities)
- Code templates for warranty + webhook systems
Stretch Goals:
- MLS integration specs (YachtWorld, Boat Trader)
- Offline mode PWA architecture
- Notification system design (email/SMS/push)
Start Command: Deploy to Claude Code Cloud after Session 1 complete
End Condition: All deliverables committed to dannystocker/navidocs repo under intelligence/session-2/