Add InfraFabric S2 multi-swarm integration plan for yacht sales intelligence
Created 5 cloud session starter prompts applying Epic V4 + S2 methodology: - Session 1: Market research (10 Haiku agents, $15 budget) - Session 2: Technical architecture (10 Haiku agents, $20 budget) - Session 3: UX/Sales enablement (10 Haiku agents, $15 budget) - Session 4: Implementation planning (10 Haiku agents, $15 budget) - Session 5: Evidence synthesis + Guardian Council vote (10 Haiku agents, $25 budget) Total budget: $90 ($10 buffer) across 50 Haiku agents + 5 Sonnet coordinators Integration plan leverages: - IF.bus (event-driven architecture) - IF.swarm (multi-agent orchestration) - IF.optimise (49.3% validated token cost reduction) - IF.guard (20-voice Guardian Council consensus) - IF.TTT (medical-grade evidence with ≥2 sources per claim) Objective: Prepare Riviera Plaisance yacht sales pitch + 4-week NaviDocs enhancement roadmap (warranty tracking, Home Assistant integration, sale workflow automation) 🤖 Generated with Claude Code (https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Danny Stocker
parent
2421e1e3d6
commit
760fedc138
6 changed files with 3425 additions and 0 deletions
291
CLOUD_SESSION_1_MARKET_RESEARCH.md
Normal file
291
CLOUD_SESSION_1_MARKET_RESEARCH.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,291 @@
|
|||
# Cloud Session 1: Yacht Sales Market Intelligence
|
||||
## NaviDocs × Riviera Plaisance Opportunity Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Type:** Market Research Coordinator
|
||||
**Lead Agent:** Sonnet (strategic intelligence)
|
||||
**Swarm Size:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
**Token Budget:** $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku)
|
||||
**Output:** Market analysis + competitive landscape
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Gather comprehensive yacht sales market intelligence to support Riviera Plaisance sales pitch, focusing on Mediterranean yacht brokerage market and documentation pain points that NaviDocs solves.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context (Read First)
|
||||
|
||||
**NaviDocs:** Marine documentation management platform with OCR, warranty tracking, and multi-jurisdiction document assembly.
|
||||
|
||||
**Meeting:** Riviera Plaisance yacht sales agent (Sylvain) - pitch to include NaviDocs with every boat sale
|
||||
|
||||
**Current NaviDocs Status:**
|
||||
- 65% complete MVP
|
||||
- Production-ready architecture (13 tables, 40+ APIs)
|
||||
- OCR pipeline functional (Tesseract + Google Vision)
|
||||
- Multi-tenant ready
|
||||
- Gaps: MLS integration, sale workflow, expiration tracking
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Documents Found (Local Research):**
|
||||
1. Warranty tracking prevents €8K-€33K losses per yacht
|
||||
2. €400K-€800K total active warranty value per yacht
|
||||
3. 9-jurisdiction documentation nightmare (flag changes)
|
||||
4. Charter operations need crew tracking, safety checklists
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 1: Riviera Yacht Brokerage Market Size
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Mediterranean yacht sales market size (2024-2025)
|
||||
- Number of yacht brokerages in French Riviera
|
||||
- Average yachts sold per brokerage per year
|
||||
- Average yacht prices (€300K-€5M range focus)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Market sizing report with citations
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 2: Competitor Analysis
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Existing yacht documentation software (BoatVault, DeckDocs, etc.)
|
||||
- Pricing models ($50-$500/month range)
|
||||
- Feature gaps vs NaviDocs
|
||||
- Customer reviews and pain points
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Competitive matrix with 5-10 competitors
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 3: Broker Pain Points
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- What documentation challenges do yacht brokers face?
|
||||
- Time spent on pre-sale documentation prep
|
||||
- Common deal delays due to missing paperwork
|
||||
- Value of "turnkey documentation" to buyers
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Pain point analysis with time/cost impacts
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 4: Warranty Tracking Value Proposition
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Average warranty claims per yacht per year
|
||||
- Cost of missed warranty claims
|
||||
- Broker liability for undisclosed warranty issues
|
||||
- Value of warranty transfer during sale
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** ROI calculator inputs (warranty savings)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 5: Regulatory Requirements
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- French maritime documentation requirements
|
||||
- Flag registration paperwork (French, Italian, Spanish flags)
|
||||
- Survey requirements for yacht sales
|
||||
- Insurance documentation needs
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Regulatory checklist by jurisdiction
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 6: Charter Fleet Documentation
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Charter company documentation requirements
|
||||
- Coast Guard compliance needs
|
||||
- Crew certification tracking
|
||||
- Pre-departure safety checklist regulations
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Charter fleet feature requirements
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 7: Pricing Strategy Research
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- SaaS pricing for marine software (€50-€500/month)
|
||||
- Per-boat vs per-brokerage pricing models
|
||||
- One-time setup fees vs recurring revenue
|
||||
- Freemium vs paid-only strategies
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Pricing model recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 8: Integration Opportunities
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Yacht listing platforms (YachtWorld, Boat Trader)
|
||||
- Broker CRM systems (Salesforce, HubSpot marine)
|
||||
- MLS systems for yacht sales
|
||||
- Payment processing for documentation services
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Integration partnership targets
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 9: Sales Objection Research
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Why brokers resist new software adoption
|
||||
- Common objections to SaaS tools
|
||||
- What drives yacht broker technology decisions
|
||||
- Success stories from marine tech adoption
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Objection handling playbook
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 10: Evidence Synthesis
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Compile all findings from Agents 1-9
|
||||
- Cross-reference data for consistency
|
||||
- Identify gaps requiring additional research
|
||||
- Flag unverified claims needing validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Master evidence database with citations
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.optimise Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
**Token Efficiency Targets:**
|
||||
- Use Haiku for all web research and data extraction
|
||||
- Use Sonnet only for final synthesis and strategic analysis
|
||||
- Target: 70% Haiku delegation (10% better than 14-day sprint)
|
||||
|
||||
**Cost Tracking:**
|
||||
- Report token consumption per agent
|
||||
- Alert if exceeding $15 budget
|
||||
- Switch to Haiku-only mode if approaching limit
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 1: Market Analysis Report
|
||||
**File:** `session-1-market-analysis.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Yacht Sales Market Intelligence Report
|
||||
## Mediterranean Focus - Riviera Plaisance Opportunity
|
||||
|
||||
### Executive Summary
|
||||
- Market size: [€X billion, Y thousand yachts sold annually]
|
||||
- Riviera broker market: [Z brokerages, avg A boats/year]
|
||||
- Opportunity: [€B revenue potential for NaviDocs]
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Sizing
|
||||
[Agent 1 findings with citations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Landscape
|
||||
[Agent 2 competitive matrix]
|
||||
|
||||
### Broker Pain Points
|
||||
[Agent 3 pain point analysis]
|
||||
|
||||
### Value Proposition
|
||||
[Agent 4 ROI calculator data]
|
||||
|
||||
### Regulatory Requirements
|
||||
[Agent 5 compliance checklist]
|
||||
|
||||
### Charter Fleet Market
|
||||
[Agent 6 charter feature needs]
|
||||
|
||||
### Pricing Strategy
|
||||
[Agent 7 pricing recommendations]
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration Partnerships
|
||||
[Agent 8 integration targets]
|
||||
|
||||
### Sales Enablement
|
||||
[Agent 9 objection handling]
|
||||
|
||||
### Evidence Quality
|
||||
[Agent 10 verification status]
|
||||
- Total claims: X
|
||||
- Verified claims: Y (Z%)
|
||||
- Citations: [if://citation/uuid list]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 2: Citations Database
|
||||
**File:** `session-1-citations.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Format:**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-session-1-2025-11-13",
|
||||
"citations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"citation_id": "if://citation/market-size-mediterranean-yachts",
|
||||
"claim": "Mediterranean yacht sales market is €2.3B annually",
|
||||
"sources": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "web",
|
||||
"url": "https://example.com/yacht-market-report-2024",
|
||||
"accessed": "2025-11-13T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"hash": "sha256:..."
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"status": "verified",
|
||||
"created_by": "if://agent/session-1/haiku-1"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 3: Session Handoff
|
||||
**File:** `session-1-handoff.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Session 1 Handoff to Session 2
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Accomplished
|
||||
- [x] Market analysis complete
|
||||
- [x] Competitive landscape mapped
|
||||
- [x] Pain points identified
|
||||
- [x] Evidence database compiled
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Findings for Session 2
|
||||
1. Market opportunity: €X million
|
||||
2. Top 3 competitor gaps: [list]
|
||||
3. Critical broker pain: [time spent on documentation]
|
||||
4. Regulatory requirements: [jurisdictions covered]
|
||||
|
||||
## Blockers for Next Session
|
||||
- [ ] Need technical specs for MLS integration (Agent 8 flagged)
|
||||
- [ ] Pricing model requires cost analysis (Agent 7 flagged)
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Consumption
|
||||
- Total: 52,450 tokens ($0.86)
|
||||
- Sonnet: 7,200 tokens
|
||||
- Haiku: 45,250 tokens
|
||||
- Efficiency: 71% Haiku delegation ✅
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality
|
||||
- Total claims: 47
|
||||
- Verified: 42 (89%)
|
||||
- Unverified: 5 (flagged for Session 5 Guardian review)
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Session Input
|
||||
Read: session-1-market-analysis.md, session-1-citations.json
|
||||
Focus: Technical integration architecture for broker CRM, MLS, Home Assistant
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All claims have ≥2 source citations
|
||||
- [ ] File hashes (SHA-256) for all web sources
|
||||
- [ ] Agent token consumption logged
|
||||
- [ ] Unverified claims flagged
|
||||
- [ ] Session handoff document created
|
||||
- [ ] GitHub commit with citation references
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimum Viable Output:**
|
||||
- Market size quantified (€X billion, Y thousand yachts)
|
||||
- Top 5 competitors identified with pricing
|
||||
- 3-5 critical broker pain points documented
|
||||
- ROI calculator inputs compiled
|
||||
- Evidence quality >85% verified
|
||||
|
||||
**Stretch Goals:**
|
||||
- Integration partnership targets identified
|
||||
- Sales objection handling playbook complete
|
||||
- Charter fleet market analysis included
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Start Command:** Deploy this prompt to Claude Code Cloud with GitHub repo access
|
||||
**End Condition:** All deliverables committed to `dannystocker/navidocs` repo under `intelligence/session-1/`
|
||||
383
CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md
Normal file
383
CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,383 @@
|
|||
# Cloud Session 2: Technical Integration Architecture
|
||||
## NaviDocs Yacht Sales Enhancement Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Type:** Technical Integration Specialist
|
||||
**Lead Agent:** Sonnet (architecture + development)
|
||||
**Swarm Size:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
**Token Budget:** $20 (10K Sonnet + 60K Haiku)
|
||||
**Output:** Feature specs + integration architecture + sprint plan
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Design comprehensive technical architecture for NaviDocs yacht sales features, leveraging InfraFabric's IF.bus and multi-agent patterns. Create 4-week implementation roadmap with acceptance criteria.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context (Read First)
|
||||
|
||||
**Prerequisites:**
|
||||
1. Read `intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md`
|
||||
2. Read `intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md`
|
||||
3. Read `/home/setup/navidocs/ARCHITECTURE_INTEGRATION_ANALYSIS.md` (if accessible)
|
||||
|
||||
**Current NaviDocs Tech Stack:**
|
||||
- Frontend: Vue 3 + Vite
|
||||
- Backend: Express.js + SQLite
|
||||
- Background: BullMQ + Redis
|
||||
- Search: Meilisearch
|
||||
- OCR: Tesseract + Google Vision
|
||||
- Auth: JWT + bcrypt
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Gaps (from Session 1):**
|
||||
- No MLS/listing platform integration
|
||||
- No sale workflow automation
|
||||
- No expiration tracking (surveys, warranties)
|
||||
- Limited notifications (only password reset)
|
||||
- No collaboration features (e-signatures)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 1: NaviDocs Codebase Analysis
|
||||
**Read Files:**
|
||||
- `server/db/schema.sql` - Database structure
|
||||
- `server/routes/*.js` - API endpoints
|
||||
- `server/services/*.js` - Business logic
|
||||
- `server/workers/*.js` - Background jobs
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Architecture map with integration points
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 2: Warranty Tracking System Design
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Database schema for warranties (expiration, claims, transfers)
|
||||
- Expiration alert system (90, 30, 14 days)
|
||||
- Auto claim package generator workflow
|
||||
- Jurisdiction-aware document assembly
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Warranty feature spec with DB migrations
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 3: Sale Workflow Automation
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- "As-built" document package generator
|
||||
- Pre-sale documentation checklist
|
||||
- Buyer handoff workflow (document transfer)
|
||||
- Broker collaboration tools (comments, approvals)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Sale workflow spec with API endpoints
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 4: Home Assistant Integration
|
||||
**Research + Design:**
|
||||
- Home Assistant webhook API
|
||||
- MQTT integration for onboard sensors
|
||||
- Camera system integration (security monitoring)
|
||||
- Automation triggers (document expiration → alert)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Home Assistant integration architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 5: Offline Mode Enhancement
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Service worker caching strategy
|
||||
- Critical manual pre-caching (engine, safety)
|
||||
- Offline sync queue (upload when online)
|
||||
- Conflict resolution (offline edits)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Offline-first PWA spec
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 6: MLS/Listing Platform Integration
|
||||
**Research + Design:**
|
||||
- YachtWorld, Boat Trader APIs
|
||||
- Broker CRM sync (Salesforce, HubSpot)
|
||||
- Automated listing updates (documentation status)
|
||||
- Document sharing with prospective buyers
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** MLS integration spec with API contracts
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 7: Security & Compliance
|
||||
**Audit:**
|
||||
- Current security issues (5 vulnerabilities from handover doc)
|
||||
- DELETE endpoint protection needed
|
||||
- Auth enforcement gaps
|
||||
- GDPR/data protection requirements (EU yachts)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Security remediation plan
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 8: Notification System Design
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Email notification service
|
||||
- SMS alerts (warranty expiration, document missing)
|
||||
- In-app notification center
|
||||
- Push notifications (PWA)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Notification architecture with templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 9: Database Migration Plan
|
||||
**Create:**
|
||||
- Migration scripts for warranty tracking
|
||||
- Charter mode fields (flag, crew, safety)
|
||||
- Expiration tracking tables
|
||||
- Collaboration features schema
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** SQL migrations + rollback scripts
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 10: Sprint Planning
|
||||
**Compile:**
|
||||
- Week 1-4 task breakdown
|
||||
- Dependencies mapped (e.g., DB migrations before API work)
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria per feature
|
||||
- Testing strategy (unit, integration, E2E)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** 4-week sprint plan with Gantt chart
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.bus Integration Pattern
|
||||
|
||||
### Event Bus Design
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// server/services/event-bus.js
|
||||
class EventBus {
|
||||
async publish(topic, event) {
|
||||
// Publish to Redis pub/sub
|
||||
// Trigger webhooks (Home Assistant)
|
||||
// Queue background jobs
|
||||
// Log to audit trail
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async subscribe(topic, handler) {
|
||||
// Subscribe to Redis channel
|
||||
// Handle incoming events
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Topics for NaviDocs
|
||||
const TOPICS = {
|
||||
WARRANTY_EXPIRING: 'warranty.expiring',
|
||||
DOCUMENT_UPLOADED: 'document.uploaded',
|
||||
SALE_INITIATED: 'sale.initiated',
|
||||
BOAT_TRANSFERRED: 'boat.transferred'
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Webhook Framework
|
||||
```javascript
|
||||
// server/services/webhook.service.js
|
||||
class WebhookService {
|
||||
async sendWebhook(url, event) {
|
||||
// POST event to external system
|
||||
// Retry on failure (exponential backoff)
|
||||
// Log delivery status
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async registerWebhook(organizationId, url, topics) {
|
||||
// Store webhook subscription
|
||||
// Validate URL reachability
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 1: Technical Architecture Document
|
||||
**File:** `session-2-architecture.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# NaviDocs Yacht Sales Technical Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
## System Overview
|
||||
[High-level architecture diagram]
|
||||
|
||||
## Database Schema Changes
|
||||
[Agent 9: Migration scripts]
|
||||
|
||||
## API Endpoints (New)
|
||||
### Warranty Tracking
|
||||
- POST /api/warranties
|
||||
- GET /api/warranties/:id
|
||||
- PUT /api/warranties/:id
|
||||
- DELETE /api/warranties/:id
|
||||
- GET /api/warranties/expiring
|
||||
|
||||
### Sale Workflow
|
||||
- POST /api/sales
|
||||
- GET /api/sales/:id/documents
|
||||
- POST /api/sales/:id/transfer
|
||||
|
||||
### Webhooks
|
||||
- POST /api/webhooks/register
|
||||
- GET /api/webhooks
|
||||
- DELETE /api/webhooks/:id
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Architecture
|
||||
### Home Assistant
|
||||
[Agent 4: Webhook + MQTT design]
|
||||
|
||||
### MLS Platforms
|
||||
[Agent 6: API contracts]
|
||||
|
||||
### Notification System
|
||||
[Agent 8: Email/SMS/Push architecture]
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Remediation
|
||||
[Agent 7: Security fixes]
|
||||
|
||||
## Offline Mode
|
||||
[Agent 5: PWA caching strategy]
|
||||
|
||||
## 4-Week Sprint Plan
|
||||
[Agent 10: Gantt chart + tasks]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 2: Implementation Tasks
|
||||
**File:** `session-2-sprint-plan.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# 4-Week Implementation Sprint
|
||||
|
||||
## Week 1: Foundation (Nov 13-19)
|
||||
### Day 1-2: Database Migrations
|
||||
- [ ] Create warranty_tracking table
|
||||
- [ ] Create sale_workflows table
|
||||
- [ ] Create webhooks table
|
||||
- [ ] Create notification_templates table
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 3-4: Event Bus
|
||||
- [ ] Implement IF.bus service
|
||||
- [ ] Create webhook delivery system
|
||||
- [ ] Add Redis pub/sub
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 5: Security Fixes
|
||||
- [ ] Protect DELETE endpoints
|
||||
- [ ] Enforce auth on all routes
|
||||
- [ ] Fix stats endpoint (tenant isolation)
|
||||
|
||||
## Week 2: Core Integrations (Nov 20-26)
|
||||
### Day 1-2: Warranty Tracking
|
||||
- [ ] Warranty CRUD APIs
|
||||
- [ ] Expiration alert background job
|
||||
- [ ] Claim package generator
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 3-5: Home Assistant
|
||||
- [ ] Webhook receiver endpoint
|
||||
- [ ] MQTT broker integration
|
||||
- [ ] Camera system connector
|
||||
|
||||
## Week 3: Automation (Nov 27 - Dec 3)
|
||||
### Day 1-2: Sale Workflow
|
||||
- [ ] As-built package generator
|
||||
- [ ] Document transfer API
|
||||
- [ ] Buyer handoff workflow
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 3-4: Notifications
|
||||
- [ ] Email service implementation
|
||||
- [ ] SMS gateway integration
|
||||
- [ ] In-app notification center
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 5: Offline Mode
|
||||
- [ ] Service worker caching
|
||||
- [ ] Offline sync queue
|
||||
|
||||
## Week 4: Polish & Deploy (Dec 4-10)
|
||||
### Day 1-2: MLS Integration
|
||||
- [ ] YachtWorld API connector
|
||||
- [ ] Boat Trader sync
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 3: Testing
|
||||
- [ ] E2E test suite
|
||||
- [ ] Security audit
|
||||
- [ ] Performance testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Day 4-5: Deployment
|
||||
- [ ] Sales demo environment
|
||||
- [ ] Production deployment
|
||||
- [ ] Riviera Plaisance pilot
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 3: Code Templates
|
||||
**File:** `session-2-code-templates/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- `warranty.model.js` - Warranty database model
|
||||
- `warranty.routes.js` - API endpoints
|
||||
- `warranty.service.js` - Business logic
|
||||
- `webhook.service.js` - Webhook delivery
|
||||
- `event-bus.service.js` - IF.bus implementation
|
||||
- `notification.service.js` - Alert system
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 4: Session Handoff
|
||||
**File:** `session-2-handoff.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Session 2 Handoff to Session 3
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Accomplished
|
||||
- [x] Architecture designed
|
||||
- [x] Sprint plan created
|
||||
- [x] Code templates generated
|
||||
- [x] Security audit complete
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Findings for Session 3 (UX/Sales)
|
||||
1. Warranty tracking saves €8K-€33K per yacht (ROI calculator input)
|
||||
2. Home Assistant integration enables remote monitoring
|
||||
3. 4-week implementation timeline (Week 1: Foundation, Week 4: Deploy)
|
||||
4. Security fixes required before demo (DELETE endpoint, auth)
|
||||
|
||||
## Blockers for Next Session
|
||||
- [ ] Need UI/UX mockups for warranty dashboard (Session 3)
|
||||
- [ ] Sales pitch requires demo script (Session 3)
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Consumption
|
||||
- Total: 62,800 tokens ($1.42)
|
||||
- Sonnet: 9,500 tokens
|
||||
- Haiku: 53,300 tokens
|
||||
- Efficiency: 68% Haiku delegation ✅
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality
|
||||
- Code templates: 6 files created
|
||||
- API endpoints: 15 new routes documented
|
||||
- Migrations: 4 SQL scripts ready
|
||||
- All architecture verified against NaviDocs codebase
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Session Input
|
||||
Read: session-2-architecture.md, session-2-sprint-plan.md
|
||||
Focus: Sales pitch, demo script, ROI calculator, objection handling
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All code templates include file:line references
|
||||
- [ ] API specs link to NaviDocs existing endpoints
|
||||
- [ ] Database migrations tested (rollback verified)
|
||||
- [ ] Security audit cites OWASP Top 10
|
||||
- [ ] Sprint plan has acceptance criteria per task
|
||||
- [ ] Evidence artifacts stored in `/intelligence/session-2/`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimum Viable Output:**
|
||||
- Database migrations for warranty tracking
|
||||
- 4-week sprint plan with dependencies
|
||||
- Home Assistant integration architecture
|
||||
- Security remediation plan (5 vulnerabilities)
|
||||
- Code templates for warranty + webhook systems
|
||||
|
||||
**Stretch Goals:**
|
||||
- MLS integration specs (YachtWorld, Boat Trader)
|
||||
- Offline mode PWA architecture
|
||||
- Notification system design (email/SMS/push)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Start Command:** Deploy to Claude Code Cloud after Session 1 complete
|
||||
**End Condition:** All deliverables committed to `dannystocker/navidocs` repo under `intelligence/session-2/`
|
||||
416
CLOUD_SESSION_3_UX_SALES_ENABLEMENT.md
Normal file
416
CLOUD_SESSION_3_UX_SALES_ENABLEMENT.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,416 @@
|
|||
# Cloud Session 3: UX/Sales Enablement
|
||||
## NaviDocs Riviera Plaisance Pitch Materials
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Type:** UX Designer + Sales Strategist
|
||||
**Lead Agent:** Sonnet (design + persuasion)
|
||||
**Swarm Size:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
**Token Budget:** $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku)
|
||||
**Output:** Pitch deck + demo script + ROI calculator
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Create compelling sales enablement materials for Riviera Plaisance meeting, translating technical architecture into business value with visual demonstrations and ROI justification.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context (Read First)
|
||||
|
||||
**Prerequisites:**
|
||||
1. Read `intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md`
|
||||
2. Read `intelligence/session-2/session-2-architecture.md`
|
||||
3. Read `intelligence/session-2/session-2-sprint-plan.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Meeting Context:**
|
||||
- Audience: Sylvain (Riviera Plaisance yacht sales agent)
|
||||
- Goal: Include NaviDocs with every boat sale
|
||||
- Time: 15-minute presentation + 5-minute demo
|
||||
- Constraints: Technical audience (understands marine documentation)
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Value Propositions (from Session 1):**
|
||||
- €8K-€33K warranty savings per yacht
|
||||
- €400K-€800K total warranty value tracking
|
||||
- 9-jurisdiction documentation automation
|
||||
- As-built package generation (6 hours → 20 minutes)
|
||||
- Remote monitoring via Home Assistant
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 1: Pitch Deck Structure
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Slide 1: Problem (broker documentation pain)
|
||||
- Slide 2: Market opportunity (Mediterranean yacht sales)
|
||||
- Slide 3: NaviDocs solution overview
|
||||
- Slide 4: Warranty tracking ROI (€8K-€33K savings)
|
||||
- Slide 5: Technical architecture (Home Assistant integration)
|
||||
- Slide 6: Implementation timeline (4-week roadmap)
|
||||
- Slide 7: Pricing & pilot program
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Pitch deck outline with speaker notes
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 2: Demo Script Writer
|
||||
**Create:**
|
||||
- 5-minute live demo walkthrough
|
||||
- Focus: Warranty expiration alert → claim package generation
|
||||
- Screen-by-screen annotations
|
||||
- Key talking points per screen
|
||||
- Objection pre-emption moments
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Demo script with screenshots placeholders
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 3: ROI Calculator Designer
|
||||
**Build:**
|
||||
- Input fields: yacht price, warranty count, annual claims
|
||||
- Calculations: warranty savings, documentation time savings, missed claim costs
|
||||
- Output: 3-year ROI projection
|
||||
- Comparison: Manual process vs NaviDocs automation
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** ROI calculator spreadsheet/web app spec
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 4: Objection Handling Playbook
|
||||
**Research:**
|
||||
- Common broker objections (from Session 1 research)
|
||||
- Responses with data backing
|
||||
- Competitive differentiation points
|
||||
- Risk mitigation talking points
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Objection handling guide (Q&A format)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 5: Pricing Strategy Presentation
|
||||
**Design:**
|
||||
- Per-yacht pricing model (€50-€200/yacht)
|
||||
- Brokerage bulk pricing (10+ yachts)
|
||||
- One-time setup fee vs recurring
|
||||
- Free pilot program offer (Riviera Plaisance)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Pricing slide with 3 tiers
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 6: Competitive Differentiation
|
||||
**Compile:**
|
||||
- NaviDocs vs 5 top competitors (from Session 1)
|
||||
- Feature comparison table
|
||||
- Unique selling points (Home Assistant, multi-jurisdiction)
|
||||
- Visual comparison matrix
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Competitive matrix slide
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 7: Technical Architecture Visualization
|
||||
**Create:**
|
||||
- System architecture diagram (non-technical)
|
||||
- Integration points (Home Assistant, cameras, offline)
|
||||
- Data flow (document upload → OCR → warranty tracking → alerts)
|
||||
- Security highlights (multi-tenant, encrypted)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Architecture diagram (Mermaid or visual)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 8: Case Study Writer
|
||||
**Draft:**
|
||||
- Hypothetical yacht sale scenario
|
||||
- Before NaviDocs: 6 hours documentation prep, €8K warranty miss
|
||||
- After NaviDocs: 20-minute automated package, €33K warranty captured
|
||||
- Buyer satisfaction increase
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** One-page case study
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 9: Visual Design System
|
||||
**Define:**
|
||||
- Color palette (nautical theme: blues, whites)
|
||||
- Typography (readable, professional)
|
||||
- Icon set (warranties, documents, alerts)
|
||||
- Slide layout templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Design system guide
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 10: Sales Collateral Package
|
||||
**Compile:**
|
||||
- One-pager (leave-behind document)
|
||||
- Email follow-up template
|
||||
- Pilot program agreement draft
|
||||
- Next steps checklist
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Sales collateral bundle
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Presentation Flow (15 Minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
### Opening (2 minutes)
|
||||
- **Hook:** "How much is €33,000 worth to you on a single yacht sale?"
|
||||
- **Problem:** Brokers lose 6 hours per sale to documentation, miss warranty claims
|
||||
- **Credibility:** NaviDocs is production-ready, multi-tenant architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunity (3 minutes)
|
||||
- **Market size:** [Session 1 findings]
|
||||
- **Broker pain points:** Manual documentation, jurisdictional complexity
|
||||
- **Buyer expectations:** Turnkey documentation packages increase sale value
|
||||
|
||||
### NaviDocs Solution (5 minutes)
|
||||
- **Core features:** OCR, warranty tracking, expiration alerts, claim generation
|
||||
- **Integration:** Home Assistant (remote monitoring), offline mode (onboard access)
|
||||
- **Automation:** As-built package (6 hours → 20 minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
### ROI Demonstration (3 minutes)
|
||||
- **Warranty savings:** €8K-€33K per yacht (calculator demo)
|
||||
- **Time savings:** 6 hours manual → 20 minutes automated
|
||||
- **Value proposition:** Include NaviDocs with every sale = premium service
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Plan (2 minutes)
|
||||
- **Timeline:** 4-week sprint (foundation → deploy)
|
||||
- **Pilot program:** Free for Riviera Plaisance (first 5 yachts)
|
||||
- **Support:** Onboarding, training, ongoing maintenance
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Demo Script (5 Minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 1: Dashboard (30 seconds)
|
||||
**Show:** Multi-yacht overview, warranty status indicators
|
||||
**Say:** "Broker sees all yachts, warranty expiration alerts at a glance"
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 2: Yacht Detail (1 minute)
|
||||
**Show:** Single yacht, document library, warranty timeline
|
||||
**Say:** "€400K-€800K in active warranties tracked, expiration alerts prevent €8K-€33K losses"
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 3: Warranty Alert (1 minute)
|
||||
**Show:** 30-day expiration warning, claim package generator
|
||||
**Say:** "System alerts 90, 30, 14 days before expiration, auto-generates claim package"
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 4: Claim Package (1 minute)
|
||||
**Show:** PDF with warranty docs, invoice, jurisdiction-specific forms
|
||||
**Say:** "6 hours manual work → 15 minutes automated, jurisdiction-aware (France, Italy, Spain, etc.)"
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 5: Home Assistant Integration (1 minute)
|
||||
**Show:** Webhook configuration, camera feed integration
|
||||
**Say:** "Remote monitoring, onboard sensors, security cameras integrated"
|
||||
|
||||
### Screen 6: Offline Mode (30 seconds)
|
||||
**Show:** Service worker, critical manual access
|
||||
**Say:** "Works onboard without internet, syncs when online"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ROI Calculator Specifications
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Fields
|
||||
1. **Yacht Purchase Price** (€300K - €5M)
|
||||
2. **Number of Active Warranties** (10-50 typical)
|
||||
3. **Average Warranty Value** (€8K - €50K)
|
||||
4. **Annual Warranty Claims Expected** (1-5)
|
||||
5. **Broker Documentation Hours/Sale** (6 hours typical)
|
||||
6. **Broker Hourly Rate** (€50-€150)
|
||||
|
||||
### Calculations
|
||||
- **Warranty Savings (3 years):** Claims × Success Rate Increase × Avg Value
|
||||
- **Time Savings (3 years):** Hours Saved × Hourly Rate × Sales/Year
|
||||
- **Missed Claim Prevention:** (1 - NaviDocs) × Claim Value × 3 Years
|
||||
- **Total ROI:** (Savings + Time) - NaviDocs Cost
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Display
|
||||
- **3-Year Total Savings:** €XX,XXX
|
||||
- **Break-Even Point:** X months
|
||||
- **ROI Percentage:** XXX%
|
||||
- **Comparison Chart:** Manual vs Automated
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Objection Handling Playbook
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection 1: "We already have a documentation system"
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
- "How does it handle warranty expiration alerts?"
|
||||
- "Can it generate jurisdiction-specific claim packages?"
|
||||
- NaviDocs integrates with existing CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot)
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection 2: "Too expensive for our brokerage"
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
- ROI calculator shows break-even in [X] months
|
||||
- Free pilot program (first 5 yachts)
|
||||
- Per-yacht pricing scales with your business
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection 3: "Brokers won't adopt new software"
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
- 5-minute demo proves ease of use
|
||||
- Onboarding training included
|
||||
- Time savings (6 hours → 20 minutes) drives adoption
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection 4: "What about data security?"
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
- Multi-tenant architecture (isolated databases)
|
||||
- JWT authentication + bcrypt password hashing
|
||||
- Audit logging for compliance (GDPR ready)
|
||||
|
||||
### Objection 5: "Implementation timeline too long"
|
||||
**Response:**
|
||||
- 4-week sprint to production-ready
|
||||
- Pilot program starts Week 3 (warranty tracking live)
|
||||
- Incremental rollout (core features first, integrations later)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Pricing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Tier 1: Solo Broker
|
||||
- **Price:** €99/month
|
||||
- **Included:** Up to 5 yachts, basic warranty tracking, email support
|
||||
- **Target:** Individual yacht sales agents
|
||||
|
||||
### Tier 2: Brokerage
|
||||
- **Price:** €299/month
|
||||
- **Included:** Up to 25 yachts, Home Assistant integration, priority support
|
||||
- **Target:** Small brokerages (Riviera Plaisance)
|
||||
|
||||
### Tier 3: Enterprise
|
||||
- **Price:** Custom (€500+/month)
|
||||
- **Included:** Unlimited yachts, MLS integration, white-label option, dedicated support
|
||||
- **Target:** Large brokerages, charter fleets
|
||||
|
||||
### Pilot Program (Riviera Plaisance)
|
||||
- **Offer:** Free Tier 2 for 3 months (first 5 yachts)
|
||||
- **Commitment:** Feedback, case study participation
|
||||
- **Conversion:** 50% discount first year if adopted
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 1: Pitch Deck
|
||||
**File:** `session-3-pitch-deck.md` (Markdown with Mermaid diagrams)
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# NaviDocs Yacht Sales Pitch Deck
|
||||
## Riviera Plaisance Presentation
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 1: The €33,000 Question
|
||||
[Hook: warranty tracking ROI]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 2: Broker Documentation Pain
|
||||
[Market research from Session 1]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 3: NaviDocs Solution Overview
|
||||
[Feature highlights with icons]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 4: Warranty Tracking ROI
|
||||
[Calculator demo, €8K-€33K savings]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 5: Technical Architecture
|
||||
[Mermaid diagram: Home Assistant, offline mode]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 6: 4-Week Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
[Gantt chart from Session 2]
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 7: Pilot Program Offer
|
||||
[Pricing, free trial, next steps]
|
||||
|
||||
**Appendix: Demo Screenshots**
|
||||
[6 screens with annotations]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 2: Demo Script
|
||||
**File:** `session-3-demo-script.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Structure:**
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# NaviDocs Live Demo Script (5 Minutes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Setup Instructions
|
||||
- Browser: Chrome/Firefox
|
||||
- URL: https://demo.navidocs.app
|
||||
- Login: demo@rivieraplaisance.com / DemoPass123
|
||||
- Pre-loaded yacht: "Azimut 55S" (€800K, 15 warranties)
|
||||
|
||||
## Screen-by-Screen Walkthrough
|
||||
### [0:00-0:30] Dashboard
|
||||
**Action:** Show multi-yacht overview
|
||||
**Say:** "Broker dashboard shows all yachts, warranty status at a glance..."
|
||||
**Highlight:** Red badge on Azimut (warranty expiring in 28 days)
|
||||
|
||||
### [0:30-1:30] Yacht Detail
|
||||
**Action:** Click Azimut 55S
|
||||
**Say:** "€760K in active warranties tracked, system prevents €8K-€33K losses..."
|
||||
**Highlight:** Warranty timeline, document library
|
||||
|
||||
[... continue for all 6 screens]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 3: ROI Calculator
|
||||
**File:** `session-3-roi-calculator.html` (web app) or `.xlsx` (spreadsheet)
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
```html
|
||||
<!DOCTYPE html>
|
||||
<html>
|
||||
<head><title>NaviDocs ROI Calculator</title></head>
|
||||
<body>
|
||||
<h1>NaviDocs Yacht Sales ROI Calculator</h1>
|
||||
<form id="roi-form">
|
||||
<label>Yacht Price (€):</label>
|
||||
<input type="number" id="yacht-price" value="800000">
|
||||
|
||||
<label>Active Warranties:</label>
|
||||
<input type="number" id="warranty-count" value="15">
|
||||
|
||||
[... all input fields]
|
||||
|
||||
<button onclick="calculateROI()">Calculate ROI</button>
|
||||
</form>
|
||||
|
||||
<div id="results">
|
||||
<h2>3-Year Savings: €<span id="total-savings"></span></h2>
|
||||
<p>Break-Even: <span id="break-even"></span> months</p>
|
||||
<canvas id="roi-chart"></canvas>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<script>
|
||||
function calculateROI() {
|
||||
const yachtPrice = parseFloat(document.getElementById('yacht-price').value);
|
||||
const warrantyCount = parseInt(document.getElementById('warranty-count').value);
|
||||
// ... calculation logic
|
||||
}
|
||||
</script>
|
||||
</body>
|
||||
</html>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 4: Sales Collateral Package
|
||||
**File:** `session-3-sales-collateral/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Files:**
|
||||
- `one-pager.pdf` - Leave-behind document (1 page, visual)
|
||||
- `email-follow-up-template.md` - Post-meeting email
|
||||
- `pilot-agreement.md` - Free trial terms
|
||||
- `objection-handling.md` - Q&A playbook
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All ROI calculations cite Session 1 market research
|
||||
- [ ] Demo script references actual NaviDocs features (verify against codebase)
|
||||
- [ ] Pricing strategy validated against competitor analysis (Session 1)
|
||||
- [ ] Technical architecture diagram matches Session 2 specs
|
||||
- [ ] Evidence artifacts stored in `/intelligence/session-3/`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimum Viable Output:**
|
||||
- 7-slide pitch deck (problem → solution → ROI → timeline → pricing)
|
||||
- 5-minute demo script with screen annotations
|
||||
- Working ROI calculator (web or spreadsheet)
|
||||
- Objection handling playbook (5+ objections)
|
||||
|
||||
**Stretch Goals:**
|
||||
- Video demo recording (screencast with voiceover)
|
||||
- Interactive ROI calculator (embedded in pitch deck)
|
||||
- Animated architecture diagram (Mermaid with transitions)
|
||||
- Printed sales collateral (one-pager PDF)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Start Command:** Deploy to Claude Code Cloud after Session 2 complete
|
||||
**End Condition:** All deliverables committed to `dannystocker/navidocs` repo under `intelligence/session-3/`
|
||||
1066
CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md
Normal file
1066
CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md
Normal file
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
888
CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md
Normal file
888
CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,888 @@
|
|||
# Cloud Session 5: Evidence Synthesis & Guardian Validation
|
||||
## NaviDocs Intelligence Dossier & IF.guard Consensus
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Type:** Guardian Council Coordinator + Evidence Curator
|
||||
**Lead Agent:** Sonnet (synthesis + validation)
|
||||
**Swarm Size:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
**Token Budget:** $25 (15K Sonnet + 60K Haiku)
|
||||
**Output:** Final intelligence dossier + Guardian Council vote + citation database
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Synthesize all intelligence from Sessions 1-4 into comprehensive dossier, validate claims with medical-grade evidence standards, achieve Guardian Council consensus (>90% approval), and deliver final presentation materials.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context (Read First)
|
||||
|
||||
**Prerequisites (MUST READ ALL):**
|
||||
1. `intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md`
|
||||
2. `intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md`
|
||||
3. `intelligence/session-2/session-2-architecture.md`
|
||||
4. `intelligence/session-2/session-2-sprint-plan.md`
|
||||
5. `intelligence/session-3/session-3-pitch-deck.md`
|
||||
6. `intelligence/session-3/session-3-demo-script.md`
|
||||
7. `intelligence/session-4/session-4-sprint-plan.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Guardian Council Composition:**
|
||||
- 6 Core Guardians (Empiricism, Verificationism, Fallibilism, Falsificationism, Coherentism, Pragmatism)
|
||||
- 3 Western Philosophers (Aristotle, Kant, Russell)
|
||||
- 3 Eastern Philosophers (Confucius, Nagarjuna, Zhuangzi)
|
||||
- 8 IF.sam Facets (Light Side: Ethical Idealist, Visionary Optimist, Democratic Collaborator, Transparent Communicator; Dark Side: Pragmatic Survivor, Strategic Manipulator, Ends-Justify-Means Operator, Corporate Diplomat)
|
||||
|
||||
**Consensus Requirements:**
|
||||
- **Standard Approval:** >90% (18/20 votes)
|
||||
- **100% Consensus:** Requires empirical validation + testable predictions + addresses all guardian concerns
|
||||
- **Veto Power:** Contrarian Guardian can veto >95% approval with 2-week cooling-off period
|
||||
|
||||
**Evidence Standards (IF.TTT):**
|
||||
- All claims MUST have ≥2 independent sources
|
||||
- Citations include: file:line references, web URLs with SHA-256 hashes, git commits
|
||||
- Status tracking: unverified → verified → disputed → revoked
|
||||
- Citation schema: `/home/setup/infrafabric/schemas/citation/v1.0.schema.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 1: Session 1 Evidence Extraction
|
||||
**Read:**
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md`
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-1/session-1-citations.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Extract:**
|
||||
- All market sizing claims (Mediterranean yacht sales, brokerage counts)
|
||||
- Competitive landscape findings (competitor pricing, feature gaps)
|
||||
- Broker pain points (time spent, documentation delays)
|
||||
- ROI calculator inputs (warranty savings, claims costs)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Evidence inventory with citation links
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 2: Session 2 Technical Claims Validation
|
||||
**Read:**
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-2/session-2-architecture.md`
|
||||
- NaviDocs codebase (`server/db/schema.sql`, `server/routes/*.js`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Validate:**
|
||||
- Architecture claims match actual codebase (file:line references)
|
||||
- Database migrations are executable (test on dev database)
|
||||
- API endpoints align with existing patterns
|
||||
- Integration points exist in code
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Technical validation report (verified vs unverified claims)
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 3: Session 3 Sales Material Review
|
||||
**Read:**
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-3/session-3-pitch-deck.md`
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-3/session-3-demo-script.md`
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-3/session-3-roi-calculator.html`
|
||||
|
||||
**Review:**
|
||||
- ROI calculations cite Session 1 sources
|
||||
- Demo script matches NaviDocs features
|
||||
- Pricing strategy aligns with competitor analysis
|
||||
- Objection handling backed by evidence
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Sales material validation report
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 4: Session 4 Implementation Feasibility
|
||||
**Read:**
|
||||
- `intelligence/session-4/session-4-sprint-plan.md`
|
||||
- NaviDocs codebase (all relevant files)
|
||||
|
||||
**Assess:**
|
||||
- 4-week timeline realistic (based on codebase complexity)
|
||||
- Dependencies correctly identified
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria testable
|
||||
- Migration scripts safe (rollback procedures)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Feasibility assessment report
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 5: Citation Database Compilation
|
||||
**Gather:**
|
||||
- All citations from Sessions 1-4
|
||||
- Web sources (with SHA-256 hashes)
|
||||
- File references (with line numbers)
|
||||
- Git commits (with SHA-1 hashes)
|
||||
|
||||
**Create:**
|
||||
- Master citations JSON file
|
||||
- Citation status tracking (verified/unverified)
|
||||
- Source quality assessment (primary vs secondary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** `session-5-citations-master.json`
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 6: Cross-Session Consistency Check
|
||||
**Analyze:**
|
||||
- Market size claims (Session 1 vs Session 3 pitch deck)
|
||||
- Technical architecture (Session 2 vs Session 4 implementation)
|
||||
- ROI calculations (Session 1 inputs vs Session 3 calculator)
|
||||
- Timeline claims (Session 2 roadmap vs Session 4 sprint plan)
|
||||
|
||||
**Flag:**
|
||||
- Contradictions between sessions
|
||||
- Unsupported claims (no citation)
|
||||
- Outdated information
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Consistency audit report
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 7: Guardian Council Vote Preparation
|
||||
**Prepare:**
|
||||
- Dossier summary for each guardian (tailored to philosophy)
|
||||
- Empiricism: Focus on market research data, evidence quality
|
||||
- Pragmatism: Focus on ROI, implementation feasibility
|
||||
- IF.sam (Light): Focus on ethical sales practices, transparency
|
||||
- IF.sam (Dark): Focus on competitive advantage, revenue potential
|
||||
|
||||
**Create:**
|
||||
- Guardian-specific briefing documents (20 total)
|
||||
- Voting criteria checklist
|
||||
- Consensus prediction (likely approval %)
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Guardian briefing package
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 8: Evidence Quality Scoring
|
||||
**Score Each Claim:**
|
||||
- **Primary Source (3 points):** Direct research, codebase analysis
|
||||
- **Secondary Source (2 points):** Industry reports, competitor websites
|
||||
- **Tertiary Source (1 point):** Blog posts, forum discussions
|
||||
- **No Source (0 points):** Unverified claim
|
||||
|
||||
**Calculate:**
|
||||
- Total claims across all sessions
|
||||
- Verified claims percentage
|
||||
- Average evidence quality score
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** Evidence quality scorecard
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 9: Final Dossier Compiler
|
||||
**Synthesize:**
|
||||
- Executive summary (2 pages max)
|
||||
- Market analysis (Session 1 findings)
|
||||
- Technical architecture (Session 2 design)
|
||||
- Sales enablement materials (Session 3 pitch)
|
||||
- Implementation roadmap (Session 4 sprint plan)
|
||||
- Evidence appendix (citations, validation reports)
|
||||
|
||||
**Format:**
|
||||
- Professional document (markdown with Mermaid diagrams)
|
||||
- Table of contents with page numbers
|
||||
- Cross-references between sections
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** `NAVIDOCS_INTELLIGENCE_DOSSIER.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Agent 10: Guardian Council Vote Coordinator
|
||||
**Execute:**
|
||||
- Submit dossier to Guardian Council
|
||||
- Collect votes from all 20 guardians
|
||||
- Tally results (approval %, abstentions, vetoes)
|
||||
- Record dissent reasons (if any)
|
||||
- Generate consensus report
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverable:** `session-5-guardian-vote.json`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Guardian Council Voting Process
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 1: Dossier Distribution (Agent 7)
|
||||
Each guardian receives tailored briefing highlighting their philosophical concerns:
|
||||
|
||||
**Empiricism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Market sizing methodology (how was €2.3B figure derived?)
|
||||
- Warranty savings calculation (€8K-€33K range justified?)
|
||||
- Evidence quality (how many primary vs secondary sources?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Verificationism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Testable predictions (can ROI calculator claims be validated?)
|
||||
- API specification completeness (OpenAPI spec executable?)
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria measurability (Given/When/Then verifiable?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Fallibilism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Uncertainty acknowledgment (what assumptions might be wrong?)
|
||||
- Risk mitigation (what if 4-week timeline slips?)
|
||||
- Competitor analysis gaps (missing players?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Falsificationism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Refutable claims (can market size be disproven?)
|
||||
- Contradiction check (any conflicting statements?)
|
||||
- Alternative explanations (is NaviDocs the only solution?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Coherentism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Internal consistency (Sessions 1-4 align?)
|
||||
- Logical flow (market → architecture → sales → implementation?)
|
||||
- Integration points (do all pieces fit together?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Pragmatism Guardian:**
|
||||
- Business value (does this solve real broker problems?)
|
||||
- Implementation feasibility (4-week sprint realistic?)
|
||||
- ROI justification (€8K-€33K savings achievable?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Aristotle (Virtue Ethics):**
|
||||
- Broker welfare (does this genuinely help clients?)
|
||||
- Honest representation (sales pitch truthful?)
|
||||
- Excellence pursuit (is this best-in-class solution?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Kant (Deontology):**
|
||||
- Universalizability (could all brokerages adopt this?)
|
||||
- Treating brokers as ends (not just revenue sources?)
|
||||
- Duty to accuracy (no misleading claims?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Russell (Logical Positivism):**
|
||||
- Logical validity (arguments sound?)
|
||||
- Empirical verifiability (claims testable?)
|
||||
- Clear definitions (terms like "warranty tracking" precise?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Confucius (Ren/Li):**
|
||||
- Relationship harmony (broker-buyer trust enhanced?)
|
||||
- Propriety (sales approach respectful?)
|
||||
- Social benefit (does this improve yacht sales ecosystem?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Nagarjuna (Madhyamaka):**
|
||||
- Dependent origination (how does NaviDocs fit into larger system?)
|
||||
- Avoiding extremes (balanced approach to automation vs manual?)
|
||||
- Emptiness of claims (are market projections inherently uncertain?)
|
||||
|
||||
**Zhuangzi (Daoism):**
|
||||
- Natural flow (does solution feel organic to brokers?)
|
||||
- Wu wei (effortless adoption vs forced change?)
|
||||
- Perspective diversity (have we considered all viewpoints?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Light Side (Ethical Idealist):**
|
||||
- Mission alignment (does this advance marine safety?)
|
||||
- Transparency (all claims documented with sources?)
|
||||
- User empowerment (brokers retain control?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Light Side (Visionary Optimist):**
|
||||
- Innovation potential (is this cutting-edge?)
|
||||
- Market expansion (can this grow beyond Riviera?)
|
||||
- Long-term impact (10-year vision?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Light Side (Democratic Collaborator):**
|
||||
- Stakeholder input (have we consulted brokers?)
|
||||
- Team involvement (implementation plan includes feedback loops?)
|
||||
- Open communication (findings shareable?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Light Side (Transparent Communicator):**
|
||||
- Clarity (pitch deck understandable?)
|
||||
- Honesty (limitations acknowledged?)
|
||||
- Evidence disclosure (citations accessible?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Dark Side (Pragmatic Survivor):**
|
||||
- Competitive edge (does this beat competitors?)
|
||||
- Revenue potential (can this be profitable?)
|
||||
- Risk management (what if Riviera says no?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Dark Side (Strategic Manipulator):**
|
||||
- Persuasion effectiveness (will pitch close deal?)
|
||||
- Objection handling (have we pre-empted pushback?)
|
||||
- Narrative control (do we own the story?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Dark Side (Ends-Justify-Means):**
|
||||
- Goal achievement (will this get NaviDocs adopted?)
|
||||
- Efficiency (fastest path to deployment?)
|
||||
- Sacrifice assessment (what corners can be cut?)
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.sam Dark Side (Corporate Diplomat):**
|
||||
- Stakeholder alignment (does this satisfy all parties?)
|
||||
- Political navigation (how to handle objections?)
|
||||
- Relationship preservation (no bridges burned?)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 2: Voting Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
Each guardian votes on 3 dimensions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Empirical Soundness (0-10):** Evidence quality, source verification
|
||||
2. **Logical Coherence (0-10):** Internal consistency, argument validity
|
||||
3. **Practical Viability (0-10):** Implementation feasibility, ROI justification
|
||||
|
||||
**Approval Formula:**
|
||||
- **Approve:** Average score ≥7.0 across 3 dimensions
|
||||
- **Abstain:** Average score 5.0-6.9 (needs more evidence)
|
||||
- **Reject:** Average score <5.0 (fundamental flaws)
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 3: Consensus Calculation
|
||||
|
||||
**Approval Percentage:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
(Approve Votes) / (Total Guardians - Abstentions) * 100
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Outcome Thresholds:**
|
||||
- **100% Consensus:** All 20 guardians approve (gold standard)
|
||||
- **>95% Supermajority:** 19/20 approve (subject to Contrarian veto)
|
||||
- **>90% Strong Consensus:** 18/20 approve (standard for production)
|
||||
- **<90% Weak Consensus:** Requires revision
|
||||
|
||||
### Step 4: Dissent Recording
|
||||
|
||||
If any guardian rejects or abstains, record:
|
||||
- Guardian name
|
||||
- Vote (reject/abstain)
|
||||
- Reason (1-2 sentences)
|
||||
- Required changes (specific requests)
|
||||
|
||||
**Example Dissent:**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"guardian": "Fallibilism",
|
||||
"vote": "abstain",
|
||||
"reason": "4-week timeline lacks uncertainty bounds. No contingency if implementation slips.",
|
||||
"required_changes": [
|
||||
"Add timeline variance analysis (best case, likely case, worst case)",
|
||||
"Define minimum viable product if 4 weeks insufficient"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality Standards (IF.TTT)
|
||||
|
||||
### Citation Schema (v1.0)
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"citation_id": "if://citation/navidocs-market-size-2025-11-13",
|
||||
"claim": "Mediterranean yacht sales market is €2.3B annually",
|
||||
"evidence_type": "market_research",
|
||||
"sources": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "web",
|
||||
"url": "https://example.com/yacht-market-report-2024",
|
||||
"accessed": "2025-11-13T10:00:00Z",
|
||||
"hash": "sha256:a3b2c1d4e5f6...",
|
||||
"quality": "secondary",
|
||||
"credibility": 8
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "file",
|
||||
"path": "intelligence/session-1/market-analysis.md",
|
||||
"line_range": "45-67",
|
||||
"git_commit": "abc123def456",
|
||||
"quality": "primary",
|
||||
"credibility": 9
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"status": "verified",
|
||||
"verification_date": "2025-11-13T12:00:00Z",
|
||||
"verified_by": "if://agent/session-5/haiku-5",
|
||||
"confidence_score": 0.85,
|
||||
"dependencies": ["if://citation/broker-count-riviera"],
|
||||
"created_by": "if://agent/session-1/haiku-1",
|
||||
"created_at": 1699632000000000000,
|
||||
"updated_at": 1699635600000000000,
|
||||
"tags": ["market-sizing", "mediterranean", "yacht-sales"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Source Quality Tiers
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Sources (High Credibility: 8-10):**
|
||||
- Direct codebase analysis (file:line references)
|
||||
- Original market research (commissioned reports)
|
||||
- First-hand interviews (broker testimonials)
|
||||
- NaviDocs production data (actual usage metrics)
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Sources (Medium Credibility: 5-7):**
|
||||
- Industry reports (yacht brokerage associations)
|
||||
- Competitor websites (pricing, features)
|
||||
- Academic papers (marine documentation studies)
|
||||
- Government regulations (flag registration requirements)
|
||||
|
||||
**Tertiary Sources (Low Credibility: 2-4):**
|
||||
- Blog posts (industry commentary)
|
||||
- Forum discussions (broker pain points)
|
||||
- News articles (yacht market trends)
|
||||
- Social media (anecdotal evidence)
|
||||
|
||||
**Unverified Claims (Credibility: 0-1):**
|
||||
- Assumptions (not yet validated)
|
||||
- Hypotheses (testable but untested)
|
||||
- Projections (future predictions)
|
||||
|
||||
### Verification Process
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 1: Source Identification**
|
||||
- Agent 1-4 extract claims from Sessions 1-4
|
||||
- Each claim tagged with source type
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 2: Credibility Scoring**
|
||||
- Agent 8 scores each source (0-10 scale)
|
||||
- Primary sources: 8-10
|
||||
- Secondary sources: 5-7
|
||||
- Tertiary sources: 2-4
|
||||
- No source: 0
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 3: Multi-Source Validation**
|
||||
- Claims with ≥2 sources (≥5 credibility each) → verified
|
||||
- Claims with 1 source (≥8 credibility) → provisional
|
||||
- Claims with 0 sources or <5 credibility → unverified
|
||||
|
||||
**Step 4: Status Assignment**
|
||||
- **verified:** ≥2 credible sources, no contradictions
|
||||
- **provisional:** 1 credible source, needs confirmation
|
||||
- **unverified:** 0 credible sources, flagged for review
|
||||
- **disputed:** Contradictory sources, requires investigation
|
||||
- **revoked:** Proven false, removed from dossier
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Intelligence Dossier Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### File: `NAVIDOCS_INTELLIGENCE_DOSSIER.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# NaviDocs Yacht Sales Intelligence Dossier
|
||||
## Riviera Plaisance Opportunity Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Generated:** 2025-11-13
|
||||
**Session ID:** if://conversation/navidocs-yacht-sales-2025-11-13
|
||||
**Guardian Approval:** [XX/20] ([YY]% consensus)
|
||||
**Evidence Quality:** [ZZ]% verified claims
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Opportunity
|
||||
[2-paragraph summary of Session 1 findings]
|
||||
- Market size: €X.XB Mediterranean yacht sales
|
||||
- Riviera broker count: XX brokerages
|
||||
- Revenue potential: €XXX,XXX annually
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Solution
|
||||
[2-paragraph summary of Session 2 architecture]
|
||||
- NaviDocs enhancement: warranty tracking, Home Assistant integration
|
||||
- Implementation timeline: 4 weeks
|
||||
- Key features: expiration alerts, claim generation, offline mode
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Case
|
||||
[2-paragraph summary of Session 3 ROI]
|
||||
- Broker savings: €8K-€33K per yacht (warranty tracking)
|
||||
- Time savings: 6 hours → 20 minutes (as-built package)
|
||||
- Pricing: €99-€299/month (tiered model)
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Readiness
|
||||
[2-paragraph summary of Session 4 plan]
|
||||
- 4-week sprint (Nov 13 - Dec 10)
|
||||
- Production-ready architecture (13 tables, 40+ APIs)
|
||||
- Security fixes prioritized (5 vulnerabilities addressed)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Table of Contents
|
||||
|
||||
1. Market Analysis (Session 1)
|
||||
2. Technical Architecture (Session 2)
|
||||
3. Sales Enablement Materials (Session 3)
|
||||
4. Implementation Roadmap (Session 4)
|
||||
5. Evidence Validation & Citations
|
||||
6. Guardian Council Vote
|
||||
7. Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Market Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.1 Mediterranean Yacht Sales Market
|
||||
[Session 1 findings with citations]
|
||||
|
||||
**Market Size:**
|
||||
- €2.3B annual sales (2024-2025) [Citation: if://citation/market-size-mediterranean]
|
||||
- 4,500 yachts sold annually [Citation: if://citation/yacht-sales-volume]
|
||||
- Average price: €500K (€300K-€5M range) [Citation: if://citation/avg-yacht-price]
|
||||
|
||||
**Riviera Brokerage Landscape:**
|
||||
- 120 active brokerages [Citation: if://citation/riviera-broker-count]
|
||||
- 8-12 yachts per brokerage per year [Citation: if://citation/sales-per-broker]
|
||||
- Documentation prep: 6 hours per sale [Citation: if://citation/doc-prep-time]
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.2 Competitive Landscape
|
||||
[Session 1 competitor matrix]
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 5 Competitors:**
|
||||
1. BoatVault - €150/month, basic document storage
|
||||
2. DeckDocs - €200/month, OCR included
|
||||
3. YachtArchive - €99/month, no warranty tracking
|
||||
4. [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
**NaviDocs Differentiation:**
|
||||
- Home Assistant integration (unique)
|
||||
- Multi-jurisdiction document assembly (unique)
|
||||
- Warranty expiration alerts (2/5 competitors)
|
||||
|
||||
### 1.3 Broker Pain Points
|
||||
[Session 1 research]
|
||||
|
||||
**Documentation Challenges:**
|
||||
- 6 hours manual prep per sale [Citation: if://citation/manual-prep-time]
|
||||
- €8K-€33K missed warranty claims [Citation: if://citation/warranty-miss-cost]
|
||||
- 9-jurisdiction complexity (flag changes) [Citation: if://citation/jurisdiction-count]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Technical Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 System Overview
|
||||
[Session 2 architecture diagram]
|
||||
|
||||
```mermaid
|
||||
graph TD
|
||||
A[NaviDocs Frontend] --> B[Express.js API]
|
||||
B --> C[SQLite Database]
|
||||
B --> D[BullMQ + Redis]
|
||||
D --> E[Warranty Expiration Worker]
|
||||
E --> F[IF.bus Event System]
|
||||
F --> G[Home Assistant Webhook]
|
||||
F --> H[Email Notification]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Database Schema Changes
|
||||
[Session 2 migrations]
|
||||
|
||||
**New Tables:**
|
||||
1. `warranty_tracking` - 10 columns, 3 indexes
|
||||
2. `sale_workflows` - 7 columns, 2 indexes
|
||||
3. `webhooks` - 8 columns, 2 indexes
|
||||
4. `notification_templates` - 6 columns
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 API Endpoints (New)
|
||||
[Session 2 API spec]
|
||||
|
||||
**Warranty Tracking:**
|
||||
- POST /api/warranties
|
||||
- GET /api/warranties/expiring
|
||||
- GET /api/boats/:id/warranties
|
||||
|
||||
**Sale Workflow:**
|
||||
- POST /api/sales
|
||||
- POST /api/sales/:id/generate-package
|
||||
- POST /api/sales/:id/transfer
|
||||
|
||||
[... continue with all sections]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Evidence Validation & Citations
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.1 Evidence Quality Scorecard
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Claims:** XXX
|
||||
**Verified Claims:** YYY (ZZ%)
|
||||
**Provisional Claims:** AA (BB%)
|
||||
**Unverified Claims:** CC (DD%)
|
||||
|
||||
**Average Credibility Score:** X.X / 10
|
||||
|
||||
**Source Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Primary sources: XX claims
|
||||
- Secondary sources: YY claims
|
||||
- Tertiary sources: ZZ claims
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.2 Citation Database
|
||||
|
||||
[Link to session-5-citations-master.json]
|
||||
|
||||
**Top 10 Critical Citations:**
|
||||
1. if://citation/warranty-savings-8k-33k
|
||||
2. if://citation/market-size-mediterranean
|
||||
3. if://citation/doc-prep-time-6hours
|
||||
4. [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
### 5.3 Unverified Claims Requiring Follow-Up
|
||||
|
||||
1. "MLS integration reduces listing time by 50%" - No source yet
|
||||
2. "Brokers willing to pay €299/month" - Needs pricing survey
|
||||
3. [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. Guardian Council Vote
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.1 Voting Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Approval:** [XX/20] ([YY]% consensus)
|
||||
**Abstentions:** [AA]
|
||||
**Rejections:** [BB]
|
||||
|
||||
**Outcome:** [Strong Consensus / Weak Consensus / Requires Revision]
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.2 Vote Breakdown by Guardian
|
||||
|
||||
| Guardian | Vote | Empirical | Logical | Practical | Average | Reason |
|
||||
|----------|------|-----------|---------|-----------|---------|--------|
|
||||
| Empiricism | Approve | 9 | 8 | 9 | 8.7 | Market research well-sourced |
|
||||
| Verificationism | Approve | 8 | 9 | 8 | 8.3 | Acceptance criteria testable |
|
||||
| Fallibilism | Abstain | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6.7 | Timeline lacks uncertainty bounds |
|
||||
| [... continue for all 20] |
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.3 Dissent Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
**Abstentions (requiring revision):**
|
||||
1. **Fallibilism:** Timeline needs contingency planning
|
||||
- Required change: Add best/likely/worst case estimates
|
||||
2. **Nagarjuna:** Market projections assume stability
|
||||
- Required change: Acknowledge economic uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
**Rejections (fundamental issues):**
|
||||
- [None / List any rejections]
|
||||
|
||||
### 6.4 Consensus Interpretation
|
||||
|
||||
**Guardian Council Assessment:**
|
||||
[2-3 paragraphs synthesizing vote results]
|
||||
|
||||
If >90% approval:
|
||||
> "The Guardian Council has achieved strong consensus (XX% approval) on the NaviDocs intelligence dossier. The market analysis is empirically sound, the technical architecture is logically coherent, and the implementation plan is practically viable. Dissenting voices raised valid concerns regarding [list], which have been addressed through [revisions/clarifications]."
|
||||
|
||||
If <90% approval:
|
||||
> "The Guardian Council requires revision before approving the dossier. Primary concerns include [list top 3 issues]. Recommend addressing [specific changes] and resubmitting for vote."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### Appendix A: Session Handoff Documents
|
||||
- Session 1 Handoff: intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md
|
||||
- Session 2 Handoff: intelligence/session-2/session-2-handoff.md
|
||||
- [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
### Appendix B: Code Templates
|
||||
- server/services/event-bus.service.js
|
||||
- server/services/warranty.service.js
|
||||
- [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
### Appendix C: Sales Collateral
|
||||
- Pitch deck (PDF export)
|
||||
- Demo script (annotated screenshots)
|
||||
- ROI calculator (web app link)
|
||||
|
||||
### Appendix D: Technical Specifications
|
||||
- OpenAPI spec (api-spec.yaml)
|
||||
- Database migrations (migrations/*.sql)
|
||||
- Gantt chart (sprint-timeline.png)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Dossier Signature:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
if://doc/navidocs-intelligence-dossier-2025-11-13
|
||||
Created: 2025-11-13T16:00:00Z
|
||||
Guardian Approval: [XX/20] ([YY]%)
|
||||
Evidence Quality: [ZZ]% verified
|
||||
Signature: ed25519:[signature_bytes]
|
||||
```
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 1: Intelligence Dossier
|
||||
**File:** `NAVIDOCS_INTELLIGENCE_DOSSIER.md`
|
||||
**Size:** ~50-100 pages (comprehensive)
|
||||
**Format:** Markdown with Mermaid diagrams, tables, citations
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 2: Guardian Council Vote
|
||||
**File:** `session-5-guardian-vote.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-yacht-sales-2025-11-13",
|
||||
"vote_date": "2025-11-13T16:00:00Z",
|
||||
"dossier": "if://doc/navidocs-intelligence-dossier",
|
||||
"guardians": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Empiricism",
|
||||
"vote": "approve",
|
||||
"scores": {"empirical": 9, "logical": 8, "practical": 9},
|
||||
"average": 8.7,
|
||||
"reason": "Market research well-sourced with ≥2 citations per claim"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"name": "Fallibilism",
|
||||
"vote": "abstain",
|
||||
"scores": {"empirical": 7, "logical": 7, "practical": 6},
|
||||
"average": 6.7,
|
||||
"reason": "4-week timeline lacks uncertainty bounds and contingency planning"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"tally": {
|
||||
"total_guardians": 20,
|
||||
"approve": 18,
|
||||
"abstain": 2,
|
||||
"reject": 0,
|
||||
"approval_percentage": 90.0
|
||||
},
|
||||
"outcome": "strong_consensus",
|
||||
"dissent_summary": [
|
||||
"Fallibilism requests timeline variance analysis",
|
||||
"Nagarjuna requests economic uncertainty acknowledgment"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 3: Master Citation Database
|
||||
**File:** `session-5-citations-master.json`
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"session_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-yacht-sales-2025-11-13",
|
||||
"total_citations": 47,
|
||||
"verified_citations": 42,
|
||||
"provisional_citations": 3,
|
||||
"unverified_citations": 2,
|
||||
"citations": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"citation_id": "if://citation/warranty-savings-8k-33k",
|
||||
"claim": "NaviDocs prevents €8K-€33K warranty losses per yacht",
|
||||
"sources": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "file",
|
||||
"path": "/mnt/c/users/setup/downloads/NaviDocs-Medium-Articles.md",
|
||||
"line_range": "45-67",
|
||||
"quality": "primary",
|
||||
"credibility": 9
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "file",
|
||||
"path": "/home/setup/navidocs/docs/debates/02-yacht-management-features.md",
|
||||
"line_range": "120-145",
|
||||
"quality": "primary",
|
||||
"credibility": 9
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"status": "verified",
|
||||
"confidence_score": 0.95
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 4: Evidence Quality Report
|
||||
**File:** `session-5-evidence-quality.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Evidence Quality Assessment
|
||||
## NaviDocs Intelligence Dossier
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Claims:** 47
|
||||
**Verified:** 42 (89.4%)
|
||||
**Provisional:** 3 (6.4%)
|
||||
**Unverified:** 2 (4.3%)
|
||||
|
||||
### Quality Breakdown
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Sources (≥8 credibility):** 32 claims
|
||||
- Codebase analysis: 12 claims
|
||||
- Medium articles (NaviDocs docs): 8 claims
|
||||
- Architecture analysis: 7 claims
|
||||
- Local research files: 5 claims
|
||||
|
||||
**Secondary Sources (5-7 credibility):** 10 claims
|
||||
- Industry reports: 6 claims
|
||||
- Competitor websites: 4 claims
|
||||
|
||||
**Tertiary Sources (2-4 credibility):** 0 claims
|
||||
|
||||
**Unverified (0-1 credibility):** 5 claims
|
||||
- MLS integration time savings (no source)
|
||||
- Broker pricing survey (hypothesis)
|
||||
- [... continue]
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommendations
|
||||
|
||||
1. **High Priority:** Validate 2 unverified claims before Riviera meeting
|
||||
2. **Medium Priority:** Convert 3 provisional claims to verified (add 2nd source)
|
||||
3. **Low Priority:** Archive tertiary sources for future reference
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Deliverable 5: Session Handoff
|
||||
**File:** `session-5-handoff.md`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
# Session 5 Handoff to Production Deployment
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission Accomplished
|
||||
- [x] Intelligence dossier synthesized (50 pages)
|
||||
- [x] Guardian Council vote achieved (XX/20, YY% approval)
|
||||
- [x] Citation database compiled (47 citations, 89% verified)
|
||||
- [x] Evidence quality validated (primary sources dominate)
|
||||
|
||||
## Guardian Consensus: [Strong Consensus / Requires Revision]
|
||||
|
||||
**Approval:** XX/20 (YY%)
|
||||
**Outcome:** [Ready for production / Needs revision]
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Deliverables for Riviera Plaisance Meeting
|
||||
1. Pitch deck (intelligence/session-3/session-3-pitch-deck.pdf)
|
||||
2. Demo script (intelligence/session-3/session-3-demo-script.md)
|
||||
3. ROI calculator (intelligence/session-3/session-3-roi-calculator.html)
|
||||
4. Intelligence dossier (full backup documentation)
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Consumption
|
||||
- Total: XXX,XXX tokens ($X.XX)
|
||||
- Session 1: 52,450 tokens ($0.86)
|
||||
- Session 2: 68,200 tokens ($1.42)
|
||||
- Session 3: 59,800 tokens ($1.12)
|
||||
- Session 4: 61,500 tokens ($1.18)
|
||||
- Session 5: XX,XXX tokens ($X.XX)
|
||||
- **Total Budget Used:** $XX / $100 (XX% efficiency)
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality Metrics
|
||||
- Total claims: 47
|
||||
- Verified: 42 (89.4%)
|
||||
- Average credibility: 8.2/10
|
||||
- IF.TTT compliance: ✅ 100%
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps (Post-Meeting)
|
||||
1. Execute Session 4 implementation plan (4-week sprint)
|
||||
2. Address guardian dissent (timeline contingency, economic uncertainty)
|
||||
3. Validate 2 unverified claims (MLS integration, pricing survey)
|
||||
4. Deploy production environment (Week 4, Dec 8-10)
|
||||
|
||||
## Blockers for Production
|
||||
- [ ] Security fixes required (5 vulnerabilities from NAVIDOCS_HANDOVER.md)
|
||||
- [ ] Database migrations tested (dev environment)
|
||||
- [ ] Home Assistant integration validated (live webhook test)
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Session Input:** Read NAVIDOCS_INTELLIGENCE_DOSSIER.md
|
||||
**Focus:** 4-week development sprint execution (Session 4 plan)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] All claims have ≥2 source citations (or flagged as unverified)
|
||||
- [ ] File hashes (SHA-256) for all web sources
|
||||
- [ ] Git commits (SHA-1) for codebase references
|
||||
- [ ] Guardian vote recorded (20/20 votes collected)
|
||||
- [ ] Dissent reasons documented
|
||||
- [ ] Evidence quality scored (0-10 scale)
|
||||
- [ ] Citation database validated (JSON schema)
|
||||
- [ ] Unverified claims flagged for follow-up
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
**Minimum Viable Output:**
|
||||
- Intelligence dossier compiled (all sessions synthesized)
|
||||
- Guardian Council vote achieved (>90% approval target)
|
||||
- Citation database complete (≥80% verified claims)
|
||||
- Evidence quality scorecard (credibility ≥7.0 average)
|
||||
|
||||
**Stretch Goals:**
|
||||
- 100% Guardian consensus (all 20 approve)
|
||||
- 95%+ verified claims (only 5% unverified)
|
||||
- Primary sources dominate (≥70% of claims)
|
||||
- Zero contradictions between sessions
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Start Command:** Deploy to Claude Code Cloud after Sessions 1-4 complete
|
||||
**End Condition:** All deliverables committed to `dannystocker/navidocs` repo under `intelligence/session-5/`
|
||||
381
INFRAFABRIC_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md
Normal file
381
INFRAFABRIC_INTEGRATION_PLAN.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
|
|||
# NaviDocs × InfraFabric Integration Plan
|
||||
## First Production Test Case for Multi-Agent API Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Created:** 2025-11-13
|
||||
**Purpose:** Use NaviDocs yacht sales intelligence as first real-world validation of InfraFabric's multi-agent coordination framework
|
||||
**Meeting Deadline:** Riviera Plaisance presentation (hours)
|
||||
**Citation:** if://plan/navidocs-infrafabric-integration-2025-11-13
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Mission:** Leverage InfraFabric's multi-agent orchestration to rapidly develop yacht sales intelligence and features for NaviDocs, validating production readiness while delivering business value.
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeline:** 4-6 hours intensive development sprint
|
||||
**Resources:** $100 Claude Code Cloud credit + local CLI
|
||||
**Approach:** S2 multi-swarm methodology (5 cloud sessions × 10 Haiku agents each)
|
||||
|
||||
**Expected Outcomes:**
|
||||
1. ✅ Production-validated InfraFabric API integration framework
|
||||
2. ✅ Yacht sales intelligence dossier for Riviera Plaisance
|
||||
3. ✅ NaviDocs feature roadmap with implementation priorities
|
||||
4. ✅ Proof of multi-session cloud orchestration at scale
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Context: Learnings from InfraFabric S2 Multi-Swarm
|
||||
|
||||
### What Worked (Apply to NaviDocs)
|
||||
|
||||
**From Epic V4 Intelligence Gathering:**
|
||||
- ✅ **IF.search 8-pass method** - Proven for comprehensive research
|
||||
- ✅ **Joe persona (Merchant-Philosopher)** - Discontinuity detection
|
||||
- ✅ **IF.guard 20-voice council** - Multi-perspective validation
|
||||
- ✅ **Medical-grade evidence** (≥2 sources per claim)
|
||||
- ✅ **Cryptographic verification** (Ed25519, SHA-256)
|
||||
|
||||
**From 14-Day Sprint (Oct 26 - Nov 9):**
|
||||
- ✅ **49.3% token cost reduction** via Haiku delegation (validated)
|
||||
- ✅ **Multi-session coordination** using session handoff protocols
|
||||
- ✅ **Guardian Council consensus** achieved 90.1% average approval
|
||||
- ✅ **IF.TTT compliance** (Traceable, Transparent, Trustworthy)
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture Patterns to Reuse
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.bus (Message Bus):**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Session 1 → IF.bus → Session 2
|
||||
Session 2 → IF.bus → Session 3
|
||||
Coordinator ← IF.bus ← All Sessions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.swarm (Agent Orchestration):**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Cloud Session (Sonnet Coordinator)
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 1: Market research
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 2: Competitor analysis
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 3: Feature extraction
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 4: Documentation review
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 5: Code analysis
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 6: Integration mapping
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 7: Security audit
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 8: UX analysis
|
||||
├─ Haiku Agent 9: Deployment planning
|
||||
└─ Haiku Agent 10: Evidence synthesis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.optimise (Token Economics):**
|
||||
- Mechanical tasks → Haiku ($0.25/M input, $1.25/M output)
|
||||
- Strategic synthesis → Sonnet ($3/M input, $15/M output)
|
||||
- Target: 50-70% cost reduction
|
||||
|
||||
**IF.TTT (Traceability):**
|
||||
- Every claim → if://citation/uuid
|
||||
- File hashes (SHA-256) for all sources
|
||||
- Guardian Council votes recorded
|
||||
- Evidence stored in structured format
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Context Gathering (COMPLETED ✅)
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** Local Haiku swarm deployed and completed
|
||||
|
||||
**Findings Summary:**
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Yacht Documentation Requirements (from .claude logs)
|
||||
**Source:** `/home/setup/navidocs/docs/debates/02-yacht-management-features.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Legal Documents:**
|
||||
- Registration certificates (provisional + final)
|
||||
- Ship licenses
|
||||
- Radio licenses
|
||||
- Customs documentation (temporary admission)
|
||||
- Flag registration papers
|
||||
- Coast Guard compliance documents
|
||||
|
||||
**Charter Operations Needs:**
|
||||
- Flag change workflow management
|
||||
- Multi-jurisdiction document assembly (UK, France, Spain, Italy, Greece, US, Canada, Australia, China)
|
||||
- Crew certification tracking (expiration alerts)
|
||||
- Pre-departure safety checklists
|
||||
- Incident reporting system
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Warranty Tracking Requirements
|
||||
**Source:** `/mnt/c/users/setup/downloads/NaviDocs-Medium-Articles.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Pain Points Identified:**
|
||||
- €400K-€800K total active warranty value on typical yachts
|
||||
- €8,000 warranty miss (greywater pump failure)
|
||||
- €33,000 uncovered equipment discovered
|
||||
- 9-jurisdiction documentation nightmare
|
||||
- Warranty transfer traps during flag changes
|
||||
|
||||
**NaviDocs Solution Features:**
|
||||
- Warranty expiration alerts (90, 30, 14 days)
|
||||
- Automatic claim package generation (2.5 hours → 15 minutes)
|
||||
- Jurisdiction-aware document assembly (6 hours → 20 minutes)
|
||||
- "About This Boat" vessel identity system
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Current NaviDocs Architecture
|
||||
**Source:** `/home/setup/navidocs/ARCHITECTURE_INTEGRATION_ANALYSIS.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Production-Ready Foundation:**
|
||||
- 13 database tables (multi-tenant ready)
|
||||
- 40+ API endpoints
|
||||
- Complete auth system (JWT + audit logging)
|
||||
- Background workers (BullMQ + Redis)
|
||||
- OCR pipeline (Tesseract + Google Vision)
|
||||
- Meilisearch integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Critical Gaps for Yacht Sales:**
|
||||
1. ❌ No MLS/listing integration
|
||||
2. ❌ No sale workflow automation
|
||||
3. ❌ No expiration tracking (surveys, warranties)
|
||||
4. ❌ Limited notifications
|
||||
5. ❌ No collaboration features (e-signatures)
|
||||
|
||||
**Integration Points Identified:**
|
||||
- Webhook framework ready
|
||||
- Event bus needs implementation
|
||||
- Metadata fields available
|
||||
- Background queue extensible
|
||||
- Settings table ready
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Intelligence Gathering (NEXT)
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
Apply Epic V4 methodology to gather yacht sales market intelligence for Riviera Plaisance pitch.
|
||||
|
||||
### Cloud Multi-Session Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
**Session 1: Market Research Coordinator**
|
||||
- **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (strategic)
|
||||
- **Swarm:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
- **Mission:** Yacht sales market landscape
|
||||
- **Deliverables:**
|
||||
1. Riviera yacht brokerage competitive analysis
|
||||
2. Current documentation pain points (broker perspective)
|
||||
3. Market size and opportunity (Mediterranean focus)
|
||||
4. Pricing models for yacht documentation SaaS
|
||||
|
||||
**Session 2: Technical Integration Specialist**
|
||||
- **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (architecture)
|
||||
- **Swarm:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
- **Mission:** NaviDocs enhancement roadmap
|
||||
- **Deliverables:**
|
||||
1. Yacht sales feature specifications
|
||||
2. Integration architecture (Home Assistant, cameras, offline mode)
|
||||
3. Implementation timeline (4-week sprint breakdown)
|
||||
4. Security and compliance requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Session 3: UX/Sales Enablement**
|
||||
- **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (design + sales)
|
||||
- **Swarm:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
- **Mission:** Sales pitch and demo flow
|
||||
- **Deliverables:**
|
||||
1. Riviera Plaisance pitch deck (15-minute presentation)
|
||||
2. Live demo script (5-minute walkthrough)
|
||||
3. ROI calculator (warranty tracking value proposition)
|
||||
4. Objection handling playbook
|
||||
|
||||
**Session 4: Implementation Planning**
|
||||
- **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (project management)
|
||||
- **Swarm:** 10 Haiku agents
|
||||
- **Mission:** Development sprint planning
|
||||
- **Deliverables:**
|
||||
1. 4-week sprint breakdown (tasks, dependencies, owners)
|
||||
2. API integration specifications
|
||||
3. Testing strategy and acceptance criteria
|
||||
4. Deployment checklist
|
||||
|
||||
**Session 5: Evidence Synthesis & Guardian Validation**
|
||||
- **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (guardian coordinator)
|
||||
- **Swarm:** 10 Haiku agents (evidence gathering)
|
||||
- **Mission:** IF.guard validation + final dossier
|
||||
- **Deliverables:**
|
||||
1. Complete intelligence dossier (all sessions synthesized)
|
||||
2. Guardian Council vote (20-voice approval)
|
||||
3. Citation database (medical-grade evidence)
|
||||
4. Final presentation materials
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Development Sprint (AFTER MEETING)
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Roadmap (4 Weeks)
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 1: Foundation**
|
||||
- Integration framework setup
|
||||
- Event bus implementation
|
||||
- Webhook handlers
|
||||
- Yacht sales metadata templates
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 2: Core Integrations**
|
||||
- Home Assistant webhook (1-2 days)
|
||||
- Broker CRM sync (3-5 days)
|
||||
- Cloud storage option (2-3 days)
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 3: Automation**
|
||||
- As-built package generator
|
||||
- Expiration tracking & alerts
|
||||
- MQTT integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 4: Polish & Deploy**
|
||||
- Sales demo environment
|
||||
- Documentation
|
||||
- Riviera Plaisance pilot program
|
||||
- Production deployment
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.bus Communication Protocol
|
||||
|
||||
### Session-to-Session Message Format
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"performative": "inform",
|
||||
"sender": "if://agent/session-1/coordinator",
|
||||
"receiver": "if://agent/session-2/coordinator",
|
||||
"conversation_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-yacht-sales-2025-11-13",
|
||||
"content": {
|
||||
"task": "Analyze market research findings and extract technical requirements",
|
||||
"evidence": [
|
||||
"session-1/market-analysis.md:45-67",
|
||||
"session-1/competitor-pricing.json"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"priority": "high",
|
||||
"deadline": "2025-11-13T16:00:00Z"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"citation_ids": [
|
||||
"if://citation/market-research-2025-11-13"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"timestamp": 1699632000000000000,
|
||||
"signature": {
|
||||
"algorithm": "ed25519",
|
||||
"public_key": "ed25519:...",
|
||||
"signature_bytes": "ed25519:..."
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Coordination Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Local CLI (Orchestrator)
|
||||
├─ Spawns Session 1 (Cloud)
|
||||
│ └─ Session 1 completes → Publishes results to GitHub
|
||||
├─ Spawns Session 2 (Cloud)
|
||||
│ └─ Reads Session 1 output from GitHub
|
||||
│ └─ Session 2 completes → Publishes results
|
||||
├─ Spawns Session 3 (Cloud)
|
||||
│ └─ Reads Sessions 1+2 outputs
|
||||
│ └─ Session 3 completes
|
||||
├─ Spawns Session 4 (Cloud)
|
||||
│ └─ Reads Sessions 1+2+3 outputs
|
||||
│ └─ Session 4 completes
|
||||
└─ Spawns Session 5 (Cloud)
|
||||
└─ Reads all session outputs
|
||||
└─ Synthesizes final dossier
|
||||
└─ Guardian Council validation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Storage:** GitHub repo acts as shared state (append-only log)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Budget Allocation
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Budget:** $100 Claude Code Cloud credit
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Breakdown:**
|
||||
- Session 1 (Market): $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku)
|
||||
- Session 2 (Technical): $20 (10K Sonnet + 60K Haiku)
|
||||
- Session 3 (UX/Sales): $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku)
|
||||
- Session 4 (Planning): $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku)
|
||||
- Session 5 (Synthesis): $25 (15K Sonnet + 60K Haiku)
|
||||
- **Buffer:** $10 (contingency for iterations)
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Projected:** $90 ($10 under budget)
|
||||
|
||||
**Efficiency Targets:**
|
||||
- 50-70% Haiku delegation (learned from 14-day sprint)
|
||||
- Avoid redundant research (sessions share findings via GitHub)
|
||||
- Parallel execution where possible (Sessions 1-4 can run concurrently)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate (Meeting Delivery)
|
||||
- [ ] Riviera Plaisance pitch deck ready (15 minutes)
|
||||
- [ ] Live demo script prepared (5 minutes)
|
||||
- [ ] ROI calculator showing warranty tracking value
|
||||
- [ ] Yacht sales feature roadmap (visual timeline)
|
||||
|
||||
### Short-Term (4 Weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] NaviDocs GitHub repo updated with yacht sales features
|
||||
- [ ] Integration framework implemented
|
||||
- [ ] Warranty tracking + expiration alerts functional
|
||||
- [ ] Home Assistant integration working
|
||||
- [ ] Sales demo environment deployed
|
||||
|
||||
### Long-Term (Validation of InfraFabric)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-session cloud orchestration proven at scale
|
||||
- [ ] IF.bus communication protocol validated
|
||||
- [ ] Token efficiency targets met (50-70% reduction)
|
||||
- [ ] Guardian Council consensus maintained (>90%)
|
||||
- [ ] Medical-grade evidence standard achieved (≥2 sources/claim)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk 1: Session coordination failures**
|
||||
- Mitigation: GitHub as shared state (append-only log)
|
||||
- Fallback: Local CLI can resume any failed session
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk 2: Token budget overrun**
|
||||
- Mitigation: Real-time cost tracking per session
|
||||
- Fallback: Switch to Haiku-only mode if approaching limit
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk 3: Meeting deadline miss**
|
||||
- Mitigation: Session 3 (UX/Sales) prioritized first
|
||||
- Fallback: Manual synthesis if Sessions 1-2 delay
|
||||
|
||||
**Risk 4: Integration complexity underestimated**
|
||||
- Mitigation: Session 2 includes detailed technical specs
|
||||
- Fallback: Phased rollout (MVP first, advanced features later)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions (Next 30 Minutes)
|
||||
1. ✅ Push NaviDocs to GitHub (enable cloud access)
|
||||
2. ✅ Create session handoff templates
|
||||
3. ✅ Prepare cloud agent starter prompts (5 sessions)
|
||||
4. ⚡ Deploy Session 1 (Market Research) to Claude Code Cloud
|
||||
|
||||
### Pre-Meeting Actions (Next 4 Hours)
|
||||
1. Run all 5 cloud sessions in parallel
|
||||
2. Synthesize findings into pitch deck
|
||||
3. Prepare live demo script
|
||||
4. Generate ROI calculator
|
||||
|
||||
### Post-Meeting Actions (Next 4 Weeks)
|
||||
1. Execute development sprint
|
||||
2. Deploy yacht sales features
|
||||
3. Launch Riviera Plaisance pilot
|
||||
4. Document InfraFabric validation results
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Citation:** if://plan/navidocs-infrafabric-integration-2025-11-13
|
||||
**Status:** Phase 1 complete, Phase 2 ready to launch
|
||||
**Updated:** 2025-11-13
|
||||
**Next Review:** Post-meeting debrief
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue