160 lines
7 KiB
HTML
160 lines
7 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
||
<html lang="en">
|
||
<head>
|
||
<meta charset="utf-8" />
|
||
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
|
||
<title>IF.Trace — Verticals</title>
|
||
<meta name="description" content="Vertical fit overview for IF.Trace: third-party trust pressure mapped to receipts, bundles, and verification." />
|
||
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../style.css" />
|
||
</head>
|
||
|
||
<body class="home home--sig">
|
||
<header class="sigNav" aria-label="Top navigation">
|
||
<div class="wrap sigNav__inner">
|
||
<a class="sigBrand" href="../" aria-label="IF.Trace home">IF.Trace</a>
|
||
<nav class="sigLinks" aria-label="Site">
|
||
<a href="./" aria-current="page">Sector</a>
|
||
<span class="sigLinks__sep" aria-hidden="true">|</span>
|
||
<a href="../pricing/">Pricing</a>
|
||
<span class="sigLinks__sep" aria-hidden="true">|</span>
|
||
<a href="../api/">API</a>
|
||
</nav>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</header>
|
||
|
||
<main id="top">
|
||
<section class="hero">
|
||
<div class="wrap hero__grid">
|
||
<div class="hero__copy">
|
||
<p class="kicker">Same mechanism, different pressure</p>
|
||
<h1>Two axes: who is buying, what is at stake.</h1>
|
||
<p class="lede">
|
||
IF.Trace doesn’t “solve compliance.” It solves the universal problem underneath compliance: third parties demanding proof without joining your
|
||
internal world. The receipts stay the same; the incentives and failure modes change.
|
||
</p>
|
||
<div class="cta">
|
||
<a class="btn btn--primary" href="../#verify">Try a live trace</a>
|
||
<a class="btn" href="../api/">Developer surface</a>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<aside class="hero__card" aria-label="Receipt-first sequence">
|
||
<div class="card">
|
||
<div class="card__media">
|
||
<img src="../assets/red-team-doc-1024-559.jpg" alt="Red Team dossier cover" loading="lazy" />
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="card__hdr">
|
||
<div class="badge badge--ok">RECEIPT‑FIRST</div>
|
||
<div class="badge">NO‑LOGIN</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
<div class="card__body">
|
||
<ol class="steps">
|
||
<li class="step">
|
||
<div class="step__n">1</div>
|
||
<div class="step__b">
|
||
<div class="step__t">Hash the source</div>
|
||
<div class="step__d">Compute <code>source_sha256</code>.</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</li>
|
||
<li class="step">
|
||
<div class="step__n">2</div>
|
||
<div class="step__b">
|
||
<div class="step__t">Hash the output</div>
|
||
<div class="step__d">Compute <code>output_sha256</code>.</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</li>
|
||
<li class="step">
|
||
<div class="step__n">3</div>
|
||
<div class="step__b">
|
||
<div class="step__t">Publish the trace</div>
|
||
<div class="step__d">A receipt page binds source ↔ output.</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</li>
|
||
</ol>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</aside>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</section>
|
||
|
||
<section class="section section--alt">
|
||
<div class="wrap">
|
||
<h2>Browse by sector</h2>
|
||
<p class="sub">Who the buyer is. The same receipts, different pressure.</p>
|
||
|
||
<div class="cards">
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Public Sector</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Procurement cycles, oversight, offline verification.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./public-sector/">Public Sector →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Enterprise</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Audits as throughput; evidence without credential sprawl.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./enterprise/">Enterprise →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Research</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Provenance, reproducibility, and external reviewers.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./research/">Research →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Professional Services</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Client handoffs, disputes, and custody that holds up later.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./professional-services/">Professional Services →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<h2 style="margin-top: 28px">Browse by industry</h2>
|
||
<p class="sub">What domain the risk lives in: regulation, data, and dispute pressure.</p>
|
||
|
||
<div class="cards">
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Healthcare</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Audit trails, privacy boundaries, dispute‑ready artifacts.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./healthcare/">Healthcare →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Financial Services</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Model risk, non‑repudiation, evidence for regulators.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./finance/">Financial →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Legal</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Chain‑of‑custody for drafts, evidence, and decisions.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./legal/">Legal →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
</div>
|
||
|
||
<h2 style="margin-top: 28px">More pressure profiles</h2>
|
||
<p class="sub">Common governance failure modes that appear across sectors and industries.</p>
|
||
|
||
<div class="cards">
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>B2B SaaS (SOC 2 / ISO)</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Auditors, procurement, “prove it existed at the time.”</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./saas/">B2B SaaS →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>SecOps / SOC</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Bind summaries to evidence; keep custody intact.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./secops/">SecOps →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>AI Product Companies</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Provable provenance for outputs: “why did it say that?”</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./ai/">AI products →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
<article class="vcard">
|
||
<h3>Industrial / Supply Chain</h3>
|
||
<p class="vcard__v">Traceability that survives vendor and contractor handoffs.</p>
|
||
<a class="vcard__more" href="./supply-chain/">Supply chain →</a>
|
||
</article>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</div>
|
||
</section>
|
||
</main>
|
||
|
||
<a class="sigContact" href="mailto:ds@infrafabric.io?subject=IF.Trace%20contact">contact</a>
|
||
</body>
|
||
</html>
|