IF.Trace

Same mechanism, different pressure

Two axes: who is buying, what is at stake.

IF.Trace doesn’t “solve compliance.” It solves the universal problem underneath compliance: third parties demanding proof without joining your internal world. The receipts stay the same; the incentives and failure modes change.

Browse by sector

Who the buyer is. The same receipts, different pressure.

Public Sector

Procurement cycles, oversight, offline verification.

Public Sector →

Enterprise

Audits as throughput; evidence without credential sprawl.

Enterprise →

Research

Provenance, reproducibility, and external reviewers.

Research →

Browse by industry

What domain the risk lives in: regulation, data, and dispute pressure.

Healthcare

Audit trails, privacy boundaries, dispute‑ready artifacts.

Healthcare →

Financial Services

Model risk, non‑repudiation, evidence for regulators.

Financial →

Legal

Chain‑of‑custody for drafts, evidence, and decisions.

Legal →

More pressure profiles

Common governance failure modes that appear across sectors and industries.

B2B SaaS (SOC 2 / ISO)

Auditors, procurement, “prove it existed at the time.”

B2B SaaS →

SecOps / SOC

Bind summaries to evidence; keep custody intact.

SecOps →

AI Product Companies

Provable provenance for outputs: “why did it say that?”

AI products →

Industrial / Supply Chain

Traceability that survives vendor and contractor handoffs.

Supply chain →
contact