2.4 KiB
2.4 KiB
IF.Trace Website — External Review Packet
- Generated:
2025-12-30 - Owner: Danny Stocker (
ds@infrafabric.io)
This packet is for external reviewers to evaluate the IF.Trace website (copy, structure, and claims) without needing to crawl or guess context.
What this is
- A public-facing explanation of IF.Trace: “confidential documents → open verification”.
- A set of pages that describe who this is for, how verification works, and what the proof does/does not claim.
- A request for critical feedback on clarity, honesty, and missing pieces.
What this is not
- Not a claim that IF.Trace guarantees compliance, intent, or correctness of interpretation.
- Not a request for marketing language or hype.
- Not a request to “agree” or be supportive — please be direct.
Response metadata (required)
Please include:
llm_name:probable_model:cutoff_date:response_date_utc:web_access_used: yes/no (list any URLs you relied on)
Live entry points
- https://infrafabric.io/
- https://infrafabric.io/verticals/
- https://infrafabric.io/pricing/
- https://infrafabric.io/api/
- https://infrafabric.io/whitepaper/
- https://infrafabric.io/about/
- https://infrafabric.io/governance/
- https://infrafabric.io/fr/
Core demo links (used throughout)
- https://infrafabric.io/static/trace/6qRgcR01kw_qNo63Dbs_ob9n
- https://infrafabric.io/static/pack/6qRgcR01kw_qNo63Dbs_ob9n
- https://infrafabric.io/static/pack/6qRgcR01kw_qNo63Dbs_ob9n.md
- https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/review/trace-bundles/b6547c03/index.html
- https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.html
- https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py
- https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/review/ifttt-paper-update/2025-12-28/review-pack.html
Questions for reviewers
- In your own words: what does IF.Trace do?
- What feels unclear, hand-wavy, or like “compliance theater”?
- Where do we over-claim (even accidentally)?
- What is missing to make a third party comfortable verifying a claim?
- Which page is strongest? Which page is weakest?
- Does the site make it obvious what is verified vs not verified?
- What would you remove to make it more honest?
- What would you add to make it more useful for real reviewers (audit/legal/security/research)?
Bias notice
This packet intentionally avoids conversion stats, testimonials, and “success stories”. Please focus on falsifiability, clarity, and what a skeptical third party would challenge.