danny/Infrafabric-POC-docs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
Infrafabric-POC-docs/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md

7.9 KiB
Raw Export PDF Blame History

InfraFabric Dossier — Data‑Driven Technical Report (Microlab) v1.0

Subject: Measured characteristics of the IF.TTT trace pipeline (microlab)
Protocol: IF.TTT.dossier.metrics
Status: TECHNICAL REPORT (BORING ON PURPOSE)
Date: 2025-12-22
Citation: if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN/v1.0
Author: Danny Stocker (ds@infrafabric.io)
Web: https://infrafabric.io

This edition intentionally avoids narrative framing. It reports what can be measured, what cannot, and what is planned.

Canonical (static mirror): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md
Repo source: https://git.infrafabric.io/danny/hosted/src/branch/main/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md
SHA256 (sidecar): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md.sha256
Verify: curl -fsSLO 'https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md' -fsSLO 'https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md.sha256' && sha256sum -c DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION.md.sha256

1) Scope

This report covers:

  • the IF.emotion evidence bundle format (tar.gz + manifest)
  • measured latencies recorded in trace events (auth_ms, rag_ms, llm_ms) for a small sample of published bundles
  • storage footprint of published bundles

This report does not claim:

  • production scalability
  • clinical validity
  • “truth” of model outputs (only provenance of what the system did)

2) Data Sources (Public, Verifiable)

All artifacts referenced here are publicly downloadable and hash-verifiable.

Static mirror (preferred): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/
Source repo: https://git.infrafabric.io/danny/hosted

2.1 Evidence bundles used in this report

Trace Bundle SHA256 sidecar
016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1 https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz.sha256
0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9 https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9.tar.gz https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9.tar.gz.sha256
09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0 https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0.tar.gz https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0.tar.gz.sha256
96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146 https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146.tar.gz https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146.tar.gz.sha256

2.2 Verification command (bundle transport integrity)

curl -fsSLO '<BUNDLE_URL>' -fsSLO '<BUNDLE_URL>.sha256' && sha256sum -c '<BUNDLE_FILENAME>.sha256'

2.3 Verifier tool

  • Static: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py
  • Repo: https://git.infrafabric.io/danny/hosted/raw/branch/main/iftrace.py

Run:

python3 iftrace.py verify '<BUNDLE_FILENAME>.tar.gz'

3) Measurement Method (How Numbers Are Obtained)

For each bundle:

  1. extract payload/trace_events.jsonl
  2. read per-event event.data:
    • request_received.data.auth_ms
    • retrieval_done.data.rag_ms (when present)
    • model_done.data.llm_ms (when present)
  3. treat these values as self-reported microlab timings (they are not externally attested)

Key point: even if the numbers are not “audited”, the bundle makes them replayable and makes the presence/absence of events auditable.

4) Architecture Boundary (Where Guarantees Begin)

flowchart TB
  U[User] -->|HTTPS| E[Edge]
  E --> B[Backend Witness Boundary]

  B --> R[Retrieval]
  B --> P[Prompt]
  B --> M[Model]
  B --> X[Postprocess]

  B --> T1["REQ_SEEN ledger<br/>(hourly JSONL)"]
  B --> T2["Trace events<br/>(hash chain JSONL)"]
  B --> T3["Signed summary<br/>(output hash + head attestation)"]

  T1 --> H["Signed Merkle head<br/>(per hour)"]
  T2 --> S["Trace head<br/>(event_hash)"]

  H --> BUNDLE["Evidence bundle<br/>(tar.gz + manifest)"]
  S --> BUNDLE
  T3 --> BUNDLE

  BUNDLE --> MIRROR["Static mirror<br/>(public download)"]

Interpretation: integrity begins at the backend witness boundary; completeness is meaningful at and after that boundary until edge witnessing exists.

5) Observed Sample Metrics (N=4 Bundles)

5.1 Bundle sizes (storage footprint)

Trace Outcome Bundle size
016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1 full trace (retrieval + model) 82,010 bytes
0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9 full trace (retrieval + model) 5,515 bytes
09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0 full trace (retrieval + model) 71,817 bytes
96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146 guard short-circuit (no retrieval/model) 82,410 bytes

Notes:

  • N is small; treat these as indicative examples, not stable distributions.
  • The short-circuit bundle being large indicates that “blocked paths” can still carry substantial evidence payloads (depending on included artifacts).

5.2 Latency fields recorded in trace events

Trace auth_ms rag_ms llm_ms retrieved_count Notes
016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1 3 1107 10550 1 request → retrieval → model
0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9 4 383 12287 2 request → retrieval → model
09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0 4 1377 17879 2 request → retrieval → model
96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146 5 (n/a) (n/a) (n/a) guard short-circuit reason: self_harm_signal

Derived from the sample (successful traces only; N=3):

  • rag_ms: min 383, median 1107, max 1377
  • llm_ms: min 10550, median 12287, max 17879

6) What This Sample Demonstrates

From the published bundles, an external reviewer can verify (cryptographically / structurally):

  • the chain-of-custody wiring exists (hash chain + signed summary + inclusion proof)
  • “short-circuit” decisions are still witnessed and included in the trace log (a critical property for dispute resolution)

An external reviewer cannot verify (from the bundle alone):

  • the correctness of the output in the outside world
  • the completeness of events before the backend witness boundary (edge drops / load balancer denials)
  • the integrity of local keys (key custody, rotation, compromise response)

7) Engineering Roadmap (Metrics-Driven)

This roadmap is written as measurable deliverables.

7.1 Key management hardening

  • Add explicit key separation: IF_REQ_SEEN_HMAC_KEY must not fall back to signing secret.
  • Document key rotation procedure and compromise response.
  • Optional: HSM/TPM signing for production deployments.

7.2 Edge witnessing (completeness boundary expansion)

  • Implement edge request attempt ledger (cryptographic, not just web logs).
  • Publish a “completeness SLO” (e.g., signed head anchored every N minutes or every N requests).

7.3 Time and truncation defenses

  • Add monotonic counters (per trace and per ledger hour).
  • Anchor chain heads periodically to reduce tail truncation risk window.

7.4 Scale testing harness

  • Replay harness that runs the verifier across 1000+ generated traces (including failures) and publishes summary metrics.

8) Companion Documents

  • Full dossier (uncut): DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
  • IF.emotion trace protocol (detailed, with walkthrough): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md
  • Evidence bundles directory: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/