Dossier: add epistemic drift under actuation note

This commit is contained in:
root 2025-12-21 19:51:59 +00:00
parent 1ea4f0ec2a
commit 5c4b1cfc30

View file

@ -25696,6 +25696,10 @@ This would be something more sophisticated: differential empathy coordination. E
The research question: How do you build multi-agent systems that cooperate emotionally without imposing a single emotional standard? The research question: How do you build multi-agent systems that cooperate emotionally without imposing a single emotional standard?
### Epistemic Drift Under Actuation (research vector)
As agents gain the ability to *act* (deploy code, move money, change infrastructure), the classic “hallucination” frame becomes incomplete: the larger risk is **epistemic drift / delusion loops**—a persistent, self-reinforcing false world-model where the system treats its own outputs/memory as evidence and resists correction. In internal notes this has been referred to as “AGI psychosis” as a **metaphor** (not a clinical claim). InfraFabrics hypothesis is that this becomes tractable when treated as an IF.BUS + IF.TTT problem: privilege boundaries prevent unverified actuation, and provenance requirements prevent self-citation from being accepted as evidence.
These opportunities aren't next-year projects. They're decade-scale research frontiers. But they're all visible from where IF.emotion currently stands. These opportunities aren't next-year projects. They're decade-scale research frontiers. But they're all visible from where IF.emotion currently stands.
The infrastructure exists. The questions are sharp. The methodology is proven. The infrastructure exists. The questions are sharp. The methodology is proven.