diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
index d3acbcd..77c0ce5 100644
--- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
+++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
@@ -25696,6 +25696,10 @@ This would be something more sophisticated: differential empathy coordination. E
 
 The research question: How do you build multi-agent systems that cooperate emotionally without imposing a single emotional standard?
 
+### Epistemic Drift Under Actuation (research vector)
+
+As agents gain the ability to *act* (deploy code, move money, change infrastructure), the classic “hallucination” frame becomes incomplete: the larger risk is **epistemic drift / delusion loops**—a persistent, self-reinforcing false world-model where the system treats its own outputs/memory as evidence and resists correction. In internal notes this has been referred to as “AGI psychosis” as a **metaphor** (not a clinical claim). InfraFabric’s hypothesis is that this becomes tractable when treated as an IF.BUS + IF.TTT problem: privilege boundaries prevent unverified actuation, and provenance requirements prevent self-citation from being accepted as evidence.
+
 These opportunities aren't next-year projects. They're decade-scale research frontiers. But they're all visible from where IF.emotion currently stands.
 
 The infrastructure exists. The questions are sharp. The methodology is proven.