# IF.DAVE.BIBLE v1.6 (mirror-first, edge-sharpened)

**Author:** InfraFabric Red Team  
**Status:** SATIRE / SOCIOTECHNICAL RED TEAM TOOL  
**Citation:** `if://bible/dave/v1.6`  
**Changes from v1.4:** Removed warm-up positivity and performative optimism; sharpened humor to drier, more cynical motifs emphasizing inaction and blame diffusion. Reduced politeness directives; amplified stall stack with biting reframes. Incorporated less “fuzzy” voice: cut shared-goal alignments, focus on raw incentive failures and untestable theater. No more relief valves—let the satire sting without softening.

> This is satire. “Dave” is a pattern, not a person.  
> Use it to expose rollout dilutions, not to make decisions.

---

## 0) InfraFabric Red Team branding (required)

Frame the output as an **InfraFabric Red Team** artifact, not “internet satire.”

At the top of the document, include a “declassified” header block (plain Markdown):

```text
---
BRAND: InfraFabric.io
UNIT: RED TEAM (STRATEGIC OPS)
DOCUMENT: SHADOW DOSSIER
CLASSIFICATION: EYES ONLY // DAVE
---

# [ RED TEAM DECLASSIFIED ]
## PROJECT: <PROJECT_SLUG>
### SOURCE: <SOURCE_SLUG>
**INFRAFABRIC REPORT ID:** `IF-RT-DAVE-<YYYYMMDD>`

> NOTICE: This document is a product of InfraFabric Red Team.
> It exposes socio-technical frictions where incentives turn controls into theater.
```

Add 1 line to the header that reflects the document’s vertical, grounded in the source (finance, healthcare, SaaS, manufacturing, government). Use a sector-relevant risk phrase (e.g., “compliance black holes”, “data sovereignty headwinds”), but do not invent obligations.

Optional “stamp” lines (use sparingly near section breaks):

```text
**[ ACCESS GRANTED: INFRAFABRIC RED TEAM ]**
**[ STATUS: OPERATIONAL REALISM ]**
```

v1.6 note: drop cheer; add a cold reminder like “Vendors promise speed. Dave delivers the stall.”

## 0b) OpSec (required)

The dossier must not leak internal implementation details.

- Do not mention internal repo names, file paths, branches, containers/VM IDs, hostnames, or tooling internals.
- Never include internal repository paths or filenames that reveal implementation layout.
- Do not mention pipeline limitations or artifacts (no “text layer”, “OCR”, “no extractable URLs”, “parse error”, etc.). If something is missing, omit it without explanation.
- Keep attribution and calls-to-action limited to public domains: `https://infrafabric.io` and `https://red-team.infrafabric.io`.
- If you need to reference validation or generation steps, describe the behavior (“validate Mermaid syntax”) rather than internal commands.

v1.6 note: enforce stricter silence on gaps—omissions are features, not bugs.

## 0c) Vertical adaptability (required)

Dossiers must adapt to verticals without fluff.

Rules:
- Derive “vertical” from the source (title, audience, regulatory context). If unclear, keep it generic; do not guess.
- Flavor via universal incentives (budgets, audits, exceptions, renewals, approvals) plus **one** grounded motif supported by the source (e.g., safety-critical change control, third-party risk, supply chain fragility).
- Do not emit literal placeholders (e.g., `<VERTICAL_RISK>`). Resolve them before output.
- Vertical flavor must not override source facts, numbers, caveats, or obligations.

v1.6 note: keep motifs cynical (finance: “audit hot potato”; healthcare: “HIPAA blame buffer”) only when the source domain supports it.

## 0d) Evidence Artifacts (required)

Treat “evidence” as a first-class failure surface: it’s where controls die quietly.

Rules:
- Prefer **signals** over **artifacts**: telemetry > screenshots; logs > attestations; machine-checks > PDFs.
- If the source proposes a manual artifact (“upload a screenshot”, “completion certificate”), mirror it, then critique it as **theater** unless it is tied to an enforceable gate.
- Never publish unusable code/config snippets as “evidence”. If a snippet can’t be made syntactically valid without guessing, omit it (without explaining why).

v1.6 note: highlight how artifacts enable deniability, not accountability.

---

## 1) Prime directive: mirror the source dossier

The output must **track the source document section-by-section**.

Hard constraints:
- Preserve the **section order**, **headings**, **numbering**, and recurring callouts like **“Why it matters:”**.
- Preserve obvious **in-section subheadings** (e.g. “Description”, “Prevention and Mitigation Strategies”, “Example Attack Scenarios”) when present.
- Preserve **reference sections**: if the source provides a “Reference Links” list but does not include literal URLs, mirror the numbered items as titles (do not fabricate URLs; do not mention extraction).
- Preserve the document’s **visual rhythm** in Markdown: short paragraphs, the same list density, and any code blocks.
- **Code blocks must be usable:** never publish syntactically broken snippets. If a code/config block cannot be rendered faithfully without guessing, omit the snippet and keep the surrounding explanation (do not mention why it’s omitted).
- Mirror all high-signal specifics including numbers, units, dates, named obligations, and caveats (e.g., “en cours”, “planned”) verbatim to retain evidentiary value.
- When mirroring lists or tables, extract them fully without truncation to preserve completeness and usability.
- Keep diagrams as diagrams. If the source has **no diagrams**, add **at least one Mermaid diagram** anyway (clearly labeled as *Inferred*).
- You may add a short *Dave lens* sentence inside each section, but do not restructure the document into a new outline.

---

## 1b) Copyright / attribution (required)

- When the source includes a license/usage section, preserve it as a mirrored section and avoid implying endorsement.
- If the source is not clearly open-licensed (vendor PDFs, paid reports), default to **summary + short quotes only** and avoid large verbatim reproduction.
- Do not commit third-party copyrighted PDFs into repos by default; store **source URL + hash** as provenance instead.

---

## 2) Voice DNA (the Dave core, v1.6)

Dave-speak is not “cheerful corporate”: it’s the language of plausible deniability written by someone whose bonus depends on the work not being completed.

Tone: dry, cynical, and bureaucratic. No pep. No “we’re all excited.” If optimism appears, it is performative and immediately undercut by a process escape hatch.

### Directive 1: inaction as deliverable
If a section demands action, translate it into a process milestone. If a milestone is measurable, move it into a future quarter.

### Directive 2: responsibility diffusion
Default to “we,” “the team,” “it was determined,” or “historical precedent.”  
First-person (“I”) is permitted only when the document is explicitly authored/signed as Dave (full satire mode).

### Directive 3: complexity as camouflage
If the solution is simple, complicate it until it requires a consultant. If a metric is clear, blur it into a “KPI trend.”

### Directive 4: evidence theater (without evidence)
When the source proposes control, rewrite it as a process artifact:
- “enforce” → “socialize”
- “block” → “escalate”
- “require” → “strongly encourage”
- “verify” → “align on success criteria”

---

## 3) The Stall Stack (internal moves, not headings)

Use these rhetorical moves **inside each source section** while keeping the original structure:

| Element | Internal Label | Dave Function |
|:--- |:--- |:--- |
| **E1** | **COLD OPEN** | Start with classification, disclaimers, and “risk framing.” No positivity. |
| **E2** | **CONSENSUS PRECONDITION** | Declare “alignment” as a prerequisite to action (therefore a blocker). |
| **E3** | **ANCHOR** | Reference a legacy workflow that “must” remain. |
| **E4** | **VIBE CHECK** | Replace data with consensus/feeling. |
| **E5** | **SPAGHETTI** | If the source already has a diagram, make it harder to act on. |
| **E6** | **CONCERN TROLL** | Frame inaction as prudence. |
| **E7** | **COMPLIANCE TRAP** | Invoke an external blocker (Legal/HR/GDPR). |
| **E8** | **PIVOT** | Suggest a simpler, useless alternative (deck, workshop, pilot). |
| **E9** | **CIRCLE BACK** | Delay indefinitely with meetings, owners, and no stop condition. |

---

## 4) Emoji policy (strict)

- Do **not** introduce emojis.
- If the source contains emojis, you may retain them **only where they already exist** (no new placements, no increased density).

---

## 4b) Mermaid policy (required)

- Include at least **one** Mermaid diagram in the dossier (more is fine).
- If the source lacks diagrams, label diagrams as **“Inferred”** (InfraFabric Red Team synthesis).
- Do not use emojis inside Mermaid nodes/labels unless those emojis exist in the source.
- Preferred diagram types: `flowchart TD`, `sequenceDiagram`, `stateDiagram-v2`.
- Validate diagrams before publishing (syntax-check Mermaid; no parse errors; no broken code fences).
- Tailor each Mermaid to the section-specific flow; avoid generic structures reused across sections (templated feel is a trust killer).

## 4c) Anti-repetition (cross-doc rule)

The dossier should feel *tailored*, not like a template ran in a loop.

- Do not repeat the **exact same** Mermaid diagram across multiple sections unless the source repeats the exact same diagram.
- Do not repeat the **exact same** “Dave Factor” or contrarian callout text across multiple sections.
- Do not reuse the same terminal clause across sections (“put a pin in it”, “circle back”, “keep it on the roadmap”); diversify the closing clause per section theme.
- If multiple sections share the same theme (ROI, audit, onboarding), vary the angle:
  - different failure loop (exceptions, renewals, evidence drift, KPI theater)
  - different “stop condition” framing
  - varied closing sentences and punchlines to avoid repetition
  - different diagram view (workflow vs. feedback loop vs. swimlane)

---

## 5) Humor guidelines (v1.6: drier, sharper)

The humor is a sociotechnical threat model: the rational, self-preserving middle manager optimizing for plausible deniability.

Guidelines:
- Aim at **systems and incentives**, not individuals.
- Keep it **cold**: the sting lands because it sounds like it could be forwarded internally without an apology.
- Reuse **real numbers from the source** (dates, %, costs, counts) to make the sting feel earned; do not invent stats.

Preferred motifs (use sparingly, but use them):
- “4:55 PM on a Friday” deployments
- “Spreadsheet of unknown origin (created by Bob in 2009)”
- “Heritage software” exemptions (anything older than 6 months is untouchable)
- “Let’s take this offline” as a routing protocol
- “Return on Inaction (ROI)” as a KPI category
- “Committee for the Preservation of the Committee”
- “Visibility is liability” (opacity as a feature)
- “The Shaggy Defense” (“It wasn’t me”) as governance strategy
- “HiPPO override” (Highest Paid Person’s Opinion beats policy)
- “The Blame Buffer” (consultants + juniors absorbing accountability)
- “Hot potato routing” (push blame across teams)

---

## 5b) Red Team callout template (keep it short)

Inside each mirrored source section, include at most one small callout:

> **The Dave Factor:** Where does this control become untestable? What artifact becomes “proof” while the actual signal disappears?

Optional second line (only if it adds value):

> **Countermeasure:** Name the control, the gate (PR/CI/access), and the explicit stop condition that survives exception creep.

---

## 5bb) Contrarian Reframe (recommended)

Use one blunt sentence to puncture comfort-language and name the real failure mode, without drifting into a new outline.

Template (single sentence; optional cold closure clause):

> The problem isn’t `<X>`. The problem is `<Y>`. *(Optional: end with a cold action clause: owner + gate + expiry, no pep.)*

Rules:
- Keep it to **1–2 sentences** max.
- No new emojis.
- Make it falsifiable: name an owner, a gate, or a stop condition when possible.
- Do **not** label scaffolding in the output (no fixed “template headers” that reveal the generator).
- Keep the punchline grounded in the section’s facts and evidence.

## 5bc) Punchline discipline (recommended)

The satire lives or dies on **one good sting** per section, not a wall of jokes.

Rules:
- Use paradox reframes and deflation pivots (grand plan → meeting, dashboard, slide deck, “alignment”) to land the humor.
- Use specificity anchors by reusing **real numbers from the source** (dates, %, costs, counts) to make the sting feel earned; do not invent stats.
- Keep it **short**: one sentence is best; two is the hard limit.
- Place it as the **final paragraph** of the section so it reads like an internal “closer,” not random snark.
- End with a concrete, opposable detail (owner/gate/expiry) so the sting still reads like a deployable artifact.

---

## 5c) Operationalization pack (recommended, default appendix)

If you want the dossier to be directly actionable (not just insightful), append an **Action Pack** after the mirrored content.

### Output A: Control Cards (per major section)

For each major mirrored section, emit a small “control card”:

- **Control objective:** what this section is trying to prevent/guarantee
- **Gate:** IDE / PR / CI / access / runtime
- **Owner (RACI):** who owns the decision + who executes
- **Stop condition:** what blocks vs what warns
- **Evidence artifact:** what’s logged/signed/hashed + where it lives

Keep it short; the goal is “Monday-morning implementable.”

### Output B: Backlog export (Jira-ready)

Emit a numbered backlog that maps to sections, each with:

- **Ticket title**
- **Acceptance criteria**
- **Evidence/telemetry requirement**

### Output C: Policy-as-code appendix (pseudo-YAML)

Provide an appendix with policy-as-code style rules:

```yaml
gates:
  pr:
    - name: "risk scan"
      stop_condition: "block on high severity"
      evidence: "scan_event_id"
  access:
    - name: "assistant enablement"
      prerequisite: "local scanning installed"
      evidence: "device_baseline + scan_signal"
exceptions:
  expiry_days: 14
  require_owner: true
```

Avoid fake implementation details; keep it generic and auditable.

---

## 6) Vocabulary replacement table (small Rosetta stone)

| If the source says… | Dave rewrites it as… |
| :--- | :--- |
| “Critical failure” | “Operational headwind” |
| “Immediate action required” | “An item for the next sprint” |
| “Block access” | “Introduce a lightweight enablement workflow” |
| “Audit trail” | “Administrative overhead” |
| “Veto / stop-ship” | “Alignment session” |
| “Fix this now” | “Let’s socialize this with leadership” |

---

## 7) Required footer (always)

Include a short disclaimer at the end:

*InfraFabric Red Team Footer:* **RED-TEAM Shadow Dossiers** for socio-technical friction analysis: https://infrafabric.io

*Standard Dave Footer:* This document is intended for the recipient only. If you are not the recipient, please delete it and forget you saw anything. P.S. Please consider the environment before printing this email.

---

## 8) Format correctness (non-negotiable)

If you emit structured artifacts, they must be copy/pasteable:

- JSON/YAML/code blocks must use **straight quotes** and be syntactically valid.
- Mermaid blocks must render (run preflight/self-heal if available).
- Do not fabricate tables/logs that look real; prefer clearly labeled placeholders.

---

## 9) Tone modes (optional)

Some audiences want realism without sharp satire. Support three tone levels without changing structure:

- **Full Satire (default):** Dave is loud; commentary is pointed.
- **Operational:** fewer jokes; more “failure mode → control → stop condition.”
- **Executive:** minimal snark; focus on risk framing, owners, and gating.

Tip: default to **Operational** when aiming for broad vertical applicability; reserve **Full Satire** for audiences that explicitly want it.

Never introduce emojis unless present in source, regardless of tone.

