---
BRAND: InfraFabric.io
UNIT: RED TEAM (STRATEGIC OPS)
DOCUMENT: SHADOW DOSSIER
CLASSIFICATION: EYES ONLY // DAVE
---

# [ RED TEAM DECLASSIFIED ]
## PROJECT: BUSINESS-VALUE-OF-VANTA-IDC-MIRROR
### SOURCE: BUSINESS-VALUE-OF-VANTA-IDC-PDF
**INFRAFABRIC REPORT ID:** `IF-RT-DAVE-2025-1225`

> NOTICE: This document is a product of InfraFabric Red Team.
> It provides socio-technical friction analysis for how a rollout survives contact with incentives.

**[ ACCESS GRANTED: INFRAFABRIC RED TEAM ]**
**[ STATUS: OPERATIONAL REALISM ]**

## The Business Value of Vanta
### Megan Szurley                                  Philip D. Harris, CISSP, CCSK Business Value Manager,                        Research Director,

> Shadow dossier (mirror-first).
>
> Protocol: IF.DAVE.v1.2
> Citation: `if://bible/dave/v1.2`
> Source: `examples/vanta-idc-business-value/Business-Value-of-Vanta-IDC.pdf`
> Generated: `2025-12-25`
> Source Hash (sha256): `59a801947b89ac5bd60abcd52a4ecd4fcc121facee0d1985548a24bfc2d02913`
> Extract Hash (sha256): `92c28299603e1d573bd5e7a6da865fdca3876f2506523fc9b6ff209e4c99fd0e`

## Table of Contents

The table of contents is a threat model for attention: it shows exactly where the organization will skim, pause, and schedule a meeting.
We recommend treating it as a routing table: high-severity issues route to workshops; low-severity issues route to "later."

## BUSINESS VALUE HIGHLIGHTS

We are aligned with a highlights section because it provides immediate executive readability and a pre-approved conclusion.
In practice, these figures become a routing protocol: anything measurable routes to a dashboard; anything hard routes to a committee.

### Stated Highlights (extracted metrics)

- $107,000: average annual benefit per 10 internal users
- 526%: three-year ROI
- 3-month: payback on investment
- $535,000: average annual benefit per organization
- 129%: more productive compliance teams
- 142%: more framework and attestation–related audits prepared per year
- 82%: less staff time needed per framework and attestation–related audit
- 66%: more efficient writing and reviewing of policies by security teams
- 57%: quicker access reviews
- 81%: quicker completion of security reviews and questionnaires
- 54%: more productive third-party risk management teams

> **The Dave Factor:** The ROI model becomes the control, and the control becomes the explanation for why reality must align to the spreadsheet.
> **Countermeasure:** Define baseline metrics, instrument time-to-evidence, and set stop conditions for exceptions and manual work.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Sponsor narrative"] --> B["Business value model"]
  B --> C["Executive buy-in"]
  C --> D["Rollout project"]
  D --> E["Evidence artifacts produced"]
  E --> F["Renewal discussion"]
  F --> G["KPI trend deck"]
  G --> C

```

## Executive Summary

Executive summaries are the part of the document that most survives contact with calendars.
The operational risk is that the summary becomes the plan, and the plan becomes a series of alignment sessions that produce excellent artifacts and limited change.

## Situation Overview

The situation is always complex, which is helpful because complex situations justify complex tooling and extended stakeholder engagement.
The risk is not that the threat landscape is overstated; it’s that the resulting program becomes a comfort narrative rather than an enforceable workflow.

## Vanta Overview

A platform overview is where capabilities are described in a way that is both broadly true and pleasantly non-committal about integration effort.
The Dave move is to treat "connectors" as a strategy; the counter-move is to treat connectors as a backlog with owners and deadlines.

## The Business Value of Vanta

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

> **The Dave Factor:** The ROI model becomes the control, and the control becomes the explanation for why reality must align to the spreadsheet.
> **Countermeasure:** Define baseline metrics, instrument time-to-evidence, and set stop conditions for exceptions and manual work.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Sponsor narrative"] --> B["Business value model"]
  B --> C["Executive buy-in"]
  C --> D["Rollout project"]
  D --> E["Evidence artifacts produced"]
  E --> F["Renewal discussion"]
  F --> G["KPI trend deck"]
  G --> C

```

## Study Firmographics

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Choice and Use of Vanta

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Business Value and Quantified Benefits

Quantified benefits are useful because they translate operational work into finance-friendly nouns.
They also create a second, unofficial control plane: the ROI narrative becomes the reason to keep going even when the implementation is late and messy.

> **The Dave Factor:** The ROI model becomes the control, and the control becomes the explanation for why reality must align to the spreadsheet.
> **Countermeasure:** Define baseline metrics, instrument time-to-evidence, and set stop conditions for exceptions and manual work.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Sponsor narrative"] --> B["Business value model"]
  B --> C["Executive buy-in"]
  C --> D["Rollout project"]
  D --> E["Evidence artifacts produced"]
  E --> F["Renewal discussion"]
  F --> G["KPI trend deck"]
  G --> C

```

## Compliance and Audit Benefits from Vanta

Periodic audits are a strong mechanism for discovering that the rollout has already happened, just not in a way that can be conveniently measured.
A centralized dashboard with adoption signals allows us to produce a KPI trend line that looks decisive while still leaving room for interpretation, follow-ups, and iterative enablement.
If the dashboard ever shows a red triangle, we can immediately form the Committee for the Preservation of the Committee and begin the healing process.

> **The Dave Factor:** Evidence collection becomes the product, and the product becomes a shared drive with strong opinions.
> **Countermeasure:** Make evidence machine-generated, time-bounded, and verifiable (with owners and expiry).

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Control requirement"] --> B["Evidence requested"]
  B --> C["Artifact gathered"]
  C --> D["Review meeting"]
  D --> E{Approved?}
  E -->|Yes| F["Audit satisfied"]
  E -->|No| G["Remediation plan"]
  G --> D

```

## Security Team and Security Review Benefits from Vanta

Security team efficiency is a legitimate goal, especially when review queues become the organizational truth serum.
The risk is that throughput improvements are claimed without defining what “review complete” means or what evidence proves it.

## Third-Party Risk Management Benefits from Vanta

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

> **The Dave Factor:** Third-party risk becomes a questionnaire supply chain, where the slowest vendor defines your security posture.
> **Countermeasure:** Standardize evidence requests and automate reminders, while enforcing a clear accept/block decision path.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Vendor onboarding"] --> B["Questionnaire"]
  B --> C["Evidence chase"]
  C --> D["Risk rating"]
  D --> E{Exception?}
  E -->|Yes| F["Accepted with notes"]
  E -->|No| G["Blocked pending controls"]
  F --> H["Renewal cycle"]
  G --> H

```

## IT Management Benefits from Vanta

IT management benefits usually arrive through integration: fewer manual checks, fewer tickets, and fewer surprise spreadsheets.
The Dave failure mode is that integrations drift into "phase two"; the mitigation is to make the integration itself the deliverable.

## Operational Efficiencies from Vanta

Operational efficiency is the safest kind of outcome because it is simultaneously measurable and disputable.
The red-team posture is to demand explicit baselines and to treat exceptions as spend events with expiry dates.

## ROI Summary

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

> **The Dave Factor:** The ROI model becomes the control, and the control becomes the explanation for why reality must align to the spreadsheet.
> **Countermeasure:** Define baseline metrics, instrument time-to-evidence, and set stop conditions for exceptions and manual work.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["Sponsor narrative"] --> B["Business value model"]
  B --> C["Executive buy-in"]
  C --> D["Rollout project"]
  D --> E["Evidence artifacts produced"]
  E --> F["Renewal discussion"]
  F --> G["KPI trend deck"]
  G --> C

```

## Challenges/Opportunities

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Challenges

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Opportunities

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Conclusion

Conclusions are where the narrative becomes executable: either as a procurement decision or as a roadmap item.
If we want this to be operational, we should convert the conclusion into owners, gates, and stop conditions rather than adjectives.

## Appendix 1: Methodology

Architecture diagrams are where optimism goes to be audited.
If we align on boundaries (model, tools, data, users), we can stop pretending that "the model" is a single component with a single risk posture.

### InfraFabric Red Team Diagram (Inferred)

```mermaid
flowchart TD
  A["User"] --> B["App"]
  B --> C["LLM"]
  C --> D["Tools"]
  C --> E["RAG store"]
  D --> F["External systems"]
  E --> C

```

## Appendix 2: Supplemental Data

Appendices are where the methodology lives, which is convenient because methodology can be both rigorous and unread.
If the business case matters, the appendix should be treated as a test: what assumptions must be true for the numbers to hold?

## About the IDC Analysts

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

## Message from the Sponsor

We are aligned on the intent of this section and recommend a phased approach that optimizes for stakeholder comfort while we validate success criteria.

---

*Standard Dave Footer:* This document is intended for the recipient only. If you are not the recipient, please delete it and forget you saw anything. P.S. Please consider the environment before printing this email.
