# Guardian Briefing Template
## NaviDocs Intelligence Dossier - Tailored Guardian Reviews

**Session:** Session 5 - Evidence Synthesis & Guardian Validation
**Purpose:** Template for Agent 7 (S5-H07) to create 20 guardian-specific briefings
**Generated:** 2025-11-13

---

## How to Use This Template

**Agent 7 (S5-H07) will:**
1. Read complete intelligence dossier from Sessions 1-4
2. Extract claims relevant to each guardian's philosophical focus
3. Populate this template for all 20 guardians
4. Create individual briefing files: `guardian-briefing-{guardian-name}.md`

---

## Template Structure

### Guardian: [NAME]
**Philosophy:** [Core philosophical framework]
**Primary Concerns:** [What this guardian cares about most]
**Evaluation Focus:** [Which dimension (Empirical/Logical/Practical) weighs heaviest]

---

#### 1. Executive Summary (Tailored)

**For [Guardian Name]:**
[2-3 sentences highlighting aspects relevant to this guardian's philosophy]

**Key Question for You:**
[Single critical question this guardian will ask]

---

#### 2. Relevant Claims & Evidence

**Claims aligned with your philosophy:**

1. **Claim:** [Specific claim from dossier]
   - **Evidence:** [Citations, sources, credibility]
   - **Relevance:** [Why this matters to this guardian]
   - **Your evaluation focus:** [What to scrutinize]

2. **Claim:** [Next claim]
   - **Evidence:** [Citations]
   - **Relevance:** [Guardian-specific importance]
   - **Your evaluation focus:** [Scrutiny points]

[Repeat for 3-5 most relevant claims]

---

#### 3. Potential Concerns (Pre-Identified)

**Issues that may trouble you:**

1. **Concern:** [Potential philosophical objection]
   - **Example:** [Specific instance from dossier]
   - **Dossier response:** [How the dossier addresses this]
   - **Your assessment needed:** [Open question]

2. **Concern:** [Next potential issue]
   - **Example:** [Instance]
   - **Dossier response:** [Mitigation]
   - **Your assessment needed:** [Question]

---

#### 4. Evaluation Dimensions Scorecard

**Empirical Soundness (0-10):**
- **Focus areas for you:** [Specific claims to verify]
- **Evidence quality:** [Primary/secondary/tertiary breakdown]
- **Your scoring guidance:** [What constitutes 7+ for this guardian]

**Logical Coherence (0-10):**
- **Focus areas for you:** [Logical arguments to scrutinize]
- **Consistency checks:** [Cross-session alignment points]
- **Your scoring guidance:** [What constitutes 7+ for this guardian]

**Practical Viability (0-10):**
- **Focus areas for you:** [Implementation aspects to assess]
- **Feasibility checks:** [Timeline, ROI, technical risks]
- **Your scoring guidance:** [What constitutes 7+ for this guardian]

---

#### 5. Voting Recommendation (Provisional)

**Based on preliminary review:**
- **Likely vote:** [APPROVE / ABSTAIN / REJECT]
- **Rationale:** [Why this vote seems appropriate]
- **Conditions for APPROVE:** [What would push abstain → approve]
- **Red flags for REJECT:** [What would trigger rejection]

---

#### 6. Questions for IF.sam Debate

**Questions you should raise:**
1. [Question for Light Side facets]
2. [Question for Dark Side facets]
3. [Question for opposing philosophers]

---

## Guardian-Specific Briefing Outlines

### Core Guardians (1-6)

#### 1. EMPIRICISM
- **Focus:** Market sizing methodology, warranty savings calculation evidence
- **Critical claims:** €2.3B market size, €8K-€33K warranty savings
- **Scoring priority:** Empirical Soundness (weight: 50%)
- **Approval bar:** 90%+ verified claims, primary sources dominate

#### 2. VERIFICATIONISM
- **Focus:** ROI calculator testability, acceptance criteria measurability
- **Critical claims:** ROI calculations, API specifications
- **Scoring priority:** Logical Coherence (weight: 40%)
- **Approval bar:** All claims have 2+ independent sources

#### 3. FALLIBILISM
- **Focus:** Timeline uncertainty, risk mitigation, assumption validation
- **Critical claims:** 4-week implementation timeline
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (weight: 50%)
- **Approval bar:** Contingency plans documented, failure modes addressed

#### 4. FALSIFICATIONISM
- **Focus:** Cross-session contradictions, refutable claims
- **Critical claims:** Any conflicting statements between Sessions 1-4
- **Scoring priority:** Logical Coherence (weight: 50%)
- **Approval bar:** Zero unresolved contradictions

#### 5. COHERENTISM
- **Focus:** Internal consistency, integration across all 4 sessions
- **Critical claims:** Market → Tech → Sales → Implementation alignment
- **Scoring priority:** Logical Coherence (weight: 60%)
- **Approval bar:** All sessions form coherent whole

#### 6. PRAGMATISM
- **Focus:** Business value, ROI justification, real broker problems
- **Critical claims:** Broker pain points, revenue potential
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (weight: 60%)
- **Approval bar:** Clear value proposition, measurable ROI

---

### Western Philosophers (7-9)

#### 7. ARISTOTLE (Virtue Ethics)
- **Focus:** Broker welfare, honest sales practices, excellence pursuit
- **Critical claims:** Sales pitch truthfulness, genuine broker benefit
- **Scoring priority:** Balance across all 3 dimensions
- **Approval bar:** Ethical sales, no misleading claims

#### 8. KANT (Deontology)
- **Focus:** Universalizability, treating brokers as ends, duty to accuracy
- **Critical claims:** Any manipulative sales tactics, misleading ROI
- **Scoring priority:** Empirical (40%) + Logical (40%) + Practical (20%)
- **Approval bar:** No categorical imperative violations

#### 9. RUSSELL (Logical Positivism)
- **Focus:** Logical validity, empirical verifiability, term precision
- **Critical claims:** Argument soundness, clear definitions
- **Scoring priority:** Empirical (30%) + Logical (60%) + Practical (10%)
- **Approval bar:** Logically valid, empirically verifiable

---

### Eastern Philosophers (10-12)

#### 10. CONFUCIUS (Ren/Li)
- **Focus:** Broker-buyer trust, relationship harmony, social benefit
- **Critical claims:** Ecosystem impact, community benefit
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (50%) + Logical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** Enhances relationships, benefits yacht sales ecosystem

#### 11. NAGARJUNA (Madhyamaka)
- **Focus:** Dependent origination, avoiding extremes, uncertainty acknowledgment
- **Critical claims:** Market projections, economic assumptions
- **Scoring priority:** Logical Coherence (50%) + Empirical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** Acknowledges interdependence, avoids dogmatism

#### 12. ZHUANGZI (Daoism)
- **Focus:** Natural flow, effortless adoption, perspective diversity
- **Critical claims:** UX design, broker adoption friction
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (60%) + Logical (20%)
- **Approval bar:** Feels organic, wu wei user experience

---

### IF.sam Light Side (13-16)

#### 13. ETHICAL IDEALIST
- **Focus:** Mission alignment (marine safety), transparency, broker empowerment
- **Critical claims:** Transparent documentation, broker control features
- **Scoring priority:** Empirical (40%) + Practical (40%)
- **Approval bar:** Ethical practices, user empowerment

#### 14. VISIONARY OPTIMIST
- **Focus:** Innovation potential, market expansion, long-term impact
- **Critical claims:** Cutting-edge features, 10-year vision
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (70%)
- **Approval bar:** Genuinely innovative, expansion beyond Riviera

#### 15. DEMOCRATIC COLLABORATOR
- **Focus:** Stakeholder input, feedback loops, team involvement
- **Critical claims:** Broker consultation, implementation feedback
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (50%) + Logical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** Stakeholders consulted, open communication

#### 16. TRANSPARENT COMMUNICATOR
- **Focus:** Clarity, honesty, evidence disclosure
- **Critical claims:** Pitch deck clarity, limitation acknowledgment
- **Scoring priority:** Empirical (50%) + Logical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** Clear communication, accessible citations

---

### IF.sam Dark Side (17-20)

#### 17. PRAGMATIC SURVIVOR
- **Focus:** Competitive edge, revenue potential, risk management
- **Critical claims:** Competitor comparison, profitability analysis
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (70%)
- **Approval bar:** Sustainable revenue, beats competitors

#### 18. STRATEGIC MANIPULATOR
- **Focus:** Persuasion effectiveness, objection handling, narrative control
- **Critical claims:** Pitch persuasiveness, objection pre-emption
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (60%) + Logical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** Compelling pitch, owns narrative

#### 19. ENDS-JUSTIFY-MEANS
- **Focus:** Goal achievement (NaviDocs adoption), efficiency, MVP definition
- **Critical claims:** Deployment speed, corner-cutting justification
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (80%)
- **Approval bar:** Fastest path to adoption, MVP clear

#### 20. CORPORATE DIPLOMAT
- **Focus:** Stakeholder alignment, political navigation, relationship preservation
- **Critical claims:** Riviera satisfaction, no burned bridges
- **Scoring priority:** Practical Viability (50%) + Logical (30%)
- **Approval bar:** All stakeholders satisfied, political risks mitigated

---

## IF.sam Debate Structure

**Light Side Coalition (Guardians 13-16):**
1. Ethical Idealist raises: "Is this truly helping brokers or extracting value?"
2. Visionary Optimist asks: "Does this advance the industry long-term?"
3. Democratic Collaborator probes: "Did we consult actual brokers?"
4. Transparent Communicator checks: "Are limitations honestly disclosed?"

**Dark Side Coalition (Guardians 17-20):**
1. Pragmatic Survivor asks: "Will this beat competitors and generate revenue?"
2. Strategic Manipulator tests: "Will the pitch actually close Riviera?"
3. Ends-Justify-Means challenges: "What corners can we cut to deploy faster?"
4. Corporate Diplomat assesses: "Are all stakeholders politically satisfied?"

**Agent 10 (S5-H10) monitors for:**
- Light/Dark divergence >30% (ESCALATE)
- Common ground emerging (consensus building)
- Unresolved ethical vs pragmatic tensions

---

## Next Steps for Agent 7 (S5-H07)

**Once Sessions 1-4 complete:**
1. Read all handoff files from Sessions 1-4
2. Extract claims relevant to each guardian
3. Populate this template 20 times (one per guardian)
4. Create files: `intelligence/session-5/guardian-briefing-{name}.md`
5. Send briefings to Agent 10 (S5-H10) for vote coordination

**Files to create:**
- `guardian-briefing-empiricism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-verificationism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-fallibilism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-falsificationism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-coherentism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-pragmatism.md`
- `guardian-briefing-aristotle.md`
- `guardian-briefing-kant.md`
- `guardian-briefing-russell.md`
- `guardian-briefing-confucius.md`
- `guardian-briefing-nagarjuna.md`
- `guardian-briefing-zhuangzi.md`
- `guardian-briefing-ethical-idealist.md`
- `guardian-briefing-visionary-optimist.md`
- `guardian-briefing-democratic-collaborator.md`
- `guardian-briefing-transparent-communicator.md`
- `guardian-briefing-pragmatic-survivor.md`
- `guardian-briefing-strategic-manipulator.md`
- `guardian-briefing-ends-justify-means.md`
- `guardian-briefing-corporate-diplomat.md`

---

**Template Version:** 1.0
**Status:** READY for Agent 7 population
**Citation:** if://doc/session-5/guardian-briefing-template-2025-11-13