# UX Review: Document Viewer Navigation & Search Improvements ## Executive Summary This review assesses proposed UX improvements for the NaviDocs document viewer, focusing on navigation controls, search functionality, and mobile/accessibility considerations. The current implementation uses verbose navigation controls and lacks in-viewer search capabilities. The proposed changes aim to create a cleaner, more compact interface with enhanced search functionality. --- ## Current State Analysis ### Current Implementation (DocumentView.vue) **Header Structure:** - Left: Back button with label - Center: Document title + boat info - Right: "Page # of # (# images)" + Language switcher **Navigation Controls:** ``` [Previous] [Input: P#] [Go] [Next] ``` - Located below header in a centered horizontal layout - Takes approximately 250-300px width - Static positioning within header section - Full-word button labels ("Previous", "Next", "Go to Page") **Current Issues Identified:** 1. **Visual Clutter:** Top-right displays redundant page count text alongside the navigation input 2. **Verbose Labels:** Full-word labels consume unnecessary space 3. **Static Positioning:** Controls scroll away with content, reducing accessibility 4. **No In-Document Search:** Users must return to homepage to search across documents 5. **Mobile Concerns:** Current controls may be cramped on smaller screens --- ## Proposed Changes Assessment ### 1. Remove Page Count Text **Proposal:** Eliminate "Page # of # (# images)" from top-right header **Analysis:** - **Pro:** Reduces redundancy - page info is already in navigation controls - **Pro:** Creates cleaner header with more focus on document title - **Pro:** Frees up space for mobile viewports - **Con:** Image count is useful metadata that would be lost **Recommendation:** ✅ **APPROVE** - Remove page count text from header, but consider alternative placement for image count indicator if images are present on current page (e.g., small badge on the PDF canvas). --- ### 2. Compact Navigation Controls **Current:** ``` [Previous] [P#] [Go] [Next] ``` **Proposed:** ``` [<] [P#]/# [Go] [>] ``` **Analysis:** **Strengths:** - **Space Efficiency:** Reduces width by ~40-50% (estimate: 150-180px vs 250-300px) - **Visual Clarity:** Arrows are universally recognized navigation symbols - **Modern Pattern:** Aligns with contemporary UI conventions (PDF readers, image galleries) - **Better Mobile:** More touch-friendly with compact layout **Concerns:** - **Accessibility:** Arrow symbols alone may not be clear for screen readers - **Touch Targets:** Need minimum 44x44px touch areas (WCAG 2.5.5) - **International Users:** Arrow direction may be ambiguous in RTL languages **Specific Recommendations:** ```html
No results found
Found {{ totalResults }} results for "{{ query }}"