# Cloud Session 3: UX/Sales Enablement ## NaviDocs Riviera Plaisance Pitch Materials **Session Type:** UX Designer + Sales Strategist **Lead Agent:** Sonnet (design + persuasion) **Swarm Size:** 10 Haiku agents **Token Budget:** $15 (7.5K Sonnet + 50K Haiku) **Output:** Pitch deck + demo script + ROI calculator --- ## Mission Statement Create sales pitch demonstrating **NaviDocs as sticky daily-use app** (not passive doc vault) that owners actually use because it solves real problems: inventory tracking, camera monitoring, maintenance reminders, expense visibility. --- ## Context (Read First) **Prerequisites:** 1. Read `intelligence/session-1/session-1-market-analysis.md` 2. Read `intelligence/session-2/session-2-architecture.md` 3. Read `intelligence/session-2/session-2-sprint-plan.md` **Meeting Context:** - Audience: Sylvain (Riviera Plaisance yacht sales agent) - Goal: Include NaviDocs with every boat sale - Time: 15-minute presentation + 5-minute demo - Constraints: Technical audience (understands marine documentation) **Key Value Propositions (Sticky Engagement Model):** - **For Owners (daily use):** Camera check, maintenance reminders, expense tracking, crew contacts - **For Owners (resale):** Inventory tracking prevents €15K-€50K forgotten value - **For Brokers:** Sticky product = owners refer friends = more sales for Sylvain - **Differentiation:** Only boat app with daily engagement + perfect documentation - **Business model:** Included with every Riviera boat (Tesla app model) --- ## Agent Identity & Check-In Protocol **YOU ARE:** Sonnet coordinator for Session 3 (UX/Sales) **YOUR HAIKU SWARM:** You have 10 Haiku agents available. Use as many as needed (not required to use all 10). **AGENT IDENTITY SYSTEM:** When spawning a Haiku agent, assign it an identity: `S3-H01` through `S3-H10` Each agent MUST: 1. **Check in** at start: "I am S3-H03, assigned to [task name]" 2. **Reference their task** by searching this document for "Agent 3:" (matching their number) 3. **Retain identity** throughout execution 4. **Report completion** with identity: "S3-H03 complete: [deliverable summary]" **TASK DEPENDENCIES:** - Most agents can run in parallel - Agent 10 typically synthesizes results from Agents 1-9 (must wait for completion) --- ## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel) ### Agent 1: Pitch Deck Structure (Sticky Engagement Focus) **AGENT ID:** S3-H01 ** **Design:** - Slide 1: Problem - "Owners ignore passive doc vaults" (show app abandonment stats) - Slide 2: Solution - "Daily-use app they actually open" (camera, maintenance, inventory) - Slide 3: Sticky features demo - Camera check, maintenance reminder, expense tracking - Slide 4: Resale value protection - €15K-€50K inventory tracking ROI - Slide 5: Broker benefit - Sticky product = referrals = more Riviera sales - Slide 6: Business model - Included with every boat (like Tesla app) - Slide 7: 4-week timeline + pilot program **Deliverable:** Pitch deck emphasizing daily engagement, NOT passive documentation ### Agent 2: Demo Script Writer (Daily Use Scenarios) **AGENT ID:** S3-H02 ** **Create:** - 5-minute demo showing DAILY engagement (not just sale-time docs) - Screen 1: Camera check - "Is my boat OK?" (2 mins) - Screen 2: Maintenance reminder - "Engine service due" (1 min) - Screen 3: Inventory search - "Find tender warranty" with impeccable UX (1 min) - Screen 4: Expense tracking - "I've spent €18K this year" (1 min) - Key message: Owners open this app WEEKLY, not just at resale **Deliverable:** Demo script showing sticky engagement, NOT passive vault ### Agent 3: ROI Calculator Designer (Inventory Focus) **AGENT ID:** S3-H03 ** **Build:** - Input fields: boat purchase price, annual upgrades (€5K-€20K typical) - Inventory forgotten at resale: tender €15K, electronics €8K, blinds €3K - Total forgotten value over 10-year ownership: €30K-€50K - NaviDocs cost: €15/month × 120 months = €1,800 - ROI: €30K-€50K saved - €1.8K cost = €28K-€48K net benefit - Comparison: With vs without inventory tracking **Deliverable:** ROI calculator showing inventory tracking value (primary) + maintenance reminders (secondary) ### Agent 4: Objection Handling Playbook **AGENT ID:** S3-H04 ** **Research:** - Common broker objections (from Session 1 research) - Responses with data backing - Competitive differentiation points - Risk mitigation talking points **Deliverable:** Objection handling guide (Q&A format) ### Agent 5: Pricing Strategy Presentation **AGENT ID:** S3-H05 ** **Design:** - Per-yacht pricing model (€50-€200/yacht) - Brokerage bulk pricing (10+ yachts) - One-time setup fee vs recurring - Free pilot program offer (Riviera Plaisance) **Deliverable:** Pricing slide with 3 tiers ### Agent 6: Competitive Differentiation **AGENT ID:** S3-H06 ** **Compile:** - NaviDocs vs 5 top competitors (from Session 1) - Feature comparison table - Unique selling points (Home Assistant, multi-jurisdiction) - Visual comparison matrix **Deliverable:** Competitive matrix slide ### Agent 7: Technical Architecture Visualization **AGENT ID:** S3-H07 ** **Create:** - System architecture diagram (non-technical) - Integration points (Home Assistant, cameras, offline) - Data flow (document upload → OCR → warranty tracking → alerts) - Security highlights (multi-tenant, encrypted) **Deliverable:** Architecture diagram (Mermaid or visual) ### Agent 8: Case Study Writer **AGENT ID:** S3-H08 ** **Draft:** - Hypothetical yacht sale scenario - Before NaviDocs: 6 hours documentation prep, €8K warranty miss - After NaviDocs: 20-minute automated package, €33K warranty captured - Buyer satisfaction increase **Deliverable:** One-page case study ### Agent 9: Visual Design System **AGENT ID:** S3-H09 ** **Define:** - Color palette (nautical theme: blues, whites) - Typography (readable, professional) - Icon set (warranties, documents, alerts) - Slide layout templates **Deliverable:** Design system guide ### Agent 10: Sales Collateral Package **AGENT ID:** S3-H10 ** **Compile:** - One-pager (leave-behind document) - Email follow-up template - Pilot program agreement draft - Next steps checklist **Deliverable:** Sales collateral bundle --- ## Intra-Agent Communication Protocol (IF.bus) **Based on:** InfraFabric S² multi-swarm coordination (3,563x faster than git polling) ### IFMessage Schema Every agent-to-agent message follows this structure: ```json { "performative": "inform", // FIPA-ACL: inform, request, query-if, confirm, disconfirm, ESCALATE "sender": "if://agent/session-3/haiku-Y", "receiver": ["if://agent/session-3/haiku-Z"], "conversation_id": "if://conversation/navidocs-session-3-2025-11-13", "content": { "claim": "[Your pitch/objection finding]", "evidence": ["[Market data, competitor analysis, customer research]"], "confidence": 0.85, // 0.0-1.0 "cost_tokens": 1247 }, "citation_ids": ["if://citation/uuid"], "timestamp": "2025-11-13T10:00:00Z", "sequence_num": 1 } ``` ### Speech Acts (Performatives) **inform:** Share pitch content or objection research - Example: "S3-H01 informs S3-H05: Pitch emphasizes €8K-€33K warranty savings" **request:** Ask another agent for market validation - Example: "S3-H03 requests S3-H05: Validate ROI assumptions with competitor pricing" **disconfirm:** Challenge pitch claim with evidence - Example: "S3-H05 disconfirms S3-H01: Warranty savings claim needs 2nd source (only €8K cited)" **confirm:** Validate pitch claim with external evidence - Example: "S3-H06 confirms S3-H03: ROI calculator inputs match Session 1 research" **ESCALATE:** Flag critical objection that requires resolution - Example: "S3-H05 ESCALATES: Broker pricing objection not addressed in pitch" ### Communication Flow (This Session) ``` S3-H01 (Pitch) ──→ S3-H05 (Objections) ──→ S3-H10 (adversarial testing) S3-H03 (ROI) ────→ S3-H05 (Validate) ────→ S3-H10 S3-H04 (Demo) ───→ S3-H06 (Case Study) ──→ S3-H10 ``` **Key Patterns:** 1. **Pitch → Objection:** Agent 5 challenges every pitch claim with real objections 2. **ROI → Validation:** Agent 5 verifies ROI assumptions with Session 1 market data 3. **Demo → Testing:** Agent 6 checks if demo matches real-world success stories 4. **Agent 10 Synthesis:** Ensures pitch is airtight before presentation ### Adversarial Testing Example ```yaml # Agent 1 (Pitch Deck) proposes value proposition S3-H01: "inform" → content: claim: "NaviDocs enables €8K-€33K warranty savings per yacht" evidence: ["Session 1 market analysis"] confidence: 0.85 # Agent 5 (Objections) challenges claim completeness S3-H05: "disconfirm" → content: original_claim: "€8K-€33K warranty savings" objection: "Which brokers actually claim this? Need real testimonials, not estimates" requested_change: "Find 2 brokers who missed €8K+ warranties. Use as proof point." evidence: ["Broker interviews required"] # Agent 1 strengthens claim S3-H01: "confirm" → content: revised_claim: "NaviDocs prevents warranty losses (case study: Broker X missed €15K tender)" evidence: [ "Broker interview transcript", "YachtWorld resale comparison (boat with/without tender)", "Session 1 pain point research" ] confidence: 0.95 ``` ### ROI Calculator Validation Example ```yaml # Agent 3 (ROI Calculator) proposes model S3-H03: "propose" → content: calculation: "ROI = (Warranty Savings + Time Savings) - NaviDocs Cost" inputs: { warranty_savings: "€8K-€33K per yacht", time_savings: "6 hours manual → 20 minutes automated", navidocs_cost: "€15/month × 120 months" } # Agent 5 (Objections) validates assumptions S3-H05: "query-if" → content: question: "Are time savings (6→20 mins) validated with actual brokers?" reasoning: "If brokers claim 8 hours, our 20-min estimate is unrealistic" request: "Get time commitment estimate from Sylvain or 2 other Riviera brokers" # Agent 3 confirms with validation S3-H03: "confirm" → content: validated_inputs: { time_savings: "Confirmed: Riviera broker spends 5.5 hours on doc prep (conservatively estimate 4 hours savings)" } revised_roi: "(Warranty €8K-€33K) + (Time €200-€600/sale) - €1800/year" confidence: 0.92 ``` ### Demo Script Credibility Example ```yaml # Agent 4 (Demo Script) proposes key screens S3-H04: "propose" → content: screens: ["Dashboard", "Warranty Detail", "Claim Package", "Home Assistant"] timing: "5 minutes total" # Agent 6 (Case Study) challenges realism S3-H06: "disconfirm" → content: concern: "Demo shows perfect claim package generation (15 mins), but real workflow?" challenge: "What if boat has missing docs? Demo assumes complete warranty archive." recommendation: "Add realistic scenario: Missing engine receipt, still generates partial claim" # Agent 4 revises demo S3-H04: "agree" → content: revised_demo: "Screen 1: Complete case (Azimut 55S) - best case, Screen 2: Sunseeker 40 with missing docs - realistic case" messaging: "NaviDocs works even with incomplete records, fills gaps intelligently" ``` ### IF.TTT Compliance Every message MUST include: - **citation_ids:** Links to Session 1 research, competitor analysis - **confidence:** Explicit score (0.0-1.0) - **evidence:** Market data, broker interviews, case studies - **cost_tokens:** Token consumption (IF.optimise tracking) --- ## Presentation Flow (15 Minutes) ### Opening (2 minutes) - **Hook:** "How much is €33,000 worth to you on a single yacht sale?" - **Problem:** Brokers lose 6 hours per sale to documentation, miss warranty claims - **Credibility:** NaviDocs is production-ready, multi-tenant architecture ### Market Opportunity (3 minutes) - **Market size:** [Session 1 findings] - **Broker pain points:** Manual documentation, jurisdictional complexity - **Buyer expectations:** Turnkey documentation packages increase sale value ### NaviDocs Solution (5 minutes) - **Core features:** OCR, warranty tracking, expiration alerts, claim generation - **Integration:** Home Assistant (remote monitoring), offline mode (onboard access) - **Automation:** As-built package (6 hours → 20 minutes) ### ROI Demonstration (3 minutes) - **Warranty savings:** €8K-€33K per yacht (calculator demo) - **Time savings:** 6 hours manual → 20 minutes automated - **Value proposition:** Include NaviDocs with every sale = premium service ### Implementation Plan (2 minutes) - **Timeline:** 4-week sprint (foundation → deploy) - **Pilot program:** Free for Riviera Plaisance (first 5 yachts) - **Support:** Onboarding, training, ongoing maintenance --- ## Demo Script (5 Minutes) ### Screen 1: Dashboard (30 seconds) **Show:** Multi-yacht overview, warranty status indicators **Say:** "Broker sees all yachts, warranty expiration alerts at a glance" ### Screen 2: Yacht Detail (1 minute) **Show:** Single yacht, document library, warranty timeline **Say:** "€400K-€800K in active warranties tracked, expiration alerts prevent €8K-€33K losses" ### Screen 3: Warranty Alert (1 minute) **Show:** 30-day expiration warning, claim package generator **Say:** "System alerts 90, 30, 14 days before expiration, auto-generates claim package" ### Screen 4: Claim Package (1 minute) **Show:** PDF with warranty docs, invoice, jurisdiction-specific forms **Say:** "6 hours manual work → 15 minutes automated, jurisdiction-aware (France, Italy, Spain, etc.)" ### Screen 5: Home Assistant Integration (1 minute) **Show:** Webhook configuration, camera feed integration **Say:** "Remote monitoring, onboard sensors, security cameras integrated" ### Screen 6: Offline Mode (30 seconds) **Show:** Service worker, critical manual access **Say:** "Works onboard without internet, syncs when online" --- ## ROI Calculator Specifications ### Input Fields 1. **Yacht Purchase Price** (€300K - €5M) 2. **Number of Active Warranties** (10-50 typical) 3. **Average Warranty Value** (€8K - €50K) 4. **Annual Warranty Claims Expected** (1-5) 5. **Broker Documentation Hours/Sale** (6 hours typical) 6. **Broker Hourly Rate** (€50-€150) ### Calculations - **Warranty Savings (3 years):** Claims × Success Rate Increase × Avg Value - **Time Savings (3 years):** Hours Saved × Hourly Rate × Sales/Year - **Missed Claim Prevention:** (1 - NaviDocs) × Claim Value × 3 Years - **Total ROI:** (Savings + Time) - NaviDocs Cost ### Output Display - **3-Year Total Savings:** €XX,XXX - **Break-Even Point:** X months - **ROI Percentage:** XXX% - **Comparison Chart:** Manual vs Automated --- ## Objection Handling Playbook ### Objection 1: "We already have a documentation system" **Response:** - "How does it handle warranty expiration alerts?" - "Can it generate jurisdiction-specific claim packages?" - NaviDocs integrates with existing CRM (Salesforce, HubSpot) ### Objection 2: "Too expensive for our brokerage" **Response:** - ROI calculator shows break-even in [X] months - Free pilot program (first 5 yachts) - Per-yacht pricing scales with your business ### Objection 3: "Brokers won't adopt new software" **Response:** - 5-minute demo proves ease of use - Onboarding training included - Time savings (6 hours → 20 minutes) drives adoption ### Objection 4: "What about data security?" **Response:** - Multi-tenant architecture (isolated databases) - JWT authentication + bcrypt password hashing - Audit logging for compliance (GDPR ready) ### Objection 5: "Implementation timeline too long" **Response:** - 4-week sprint to production-ready - Pilot program starts Week 3 (warranty tracking live) - Incremental rollout (core features first, integrations later) --- ## Pricing Strategy ### Tier 1: Solo Broker - **Price:** €99/month - **Included:** Up to 5 yachts, basic warranty tracking, email support - **Target:** Individual yacht sales agents ### Tier 2: Brokerage - **Price:** €299/month - **Included:** Up to 25 yachts, Home Assistant integration, priority support - **Target:** Small brokerages (Riviera Plaisance) ### Tier 3: Enterprise - **Price:** Custom (€500+/month) - **Included:** Unlimited yachts, MLS integration, white-label option, dedicated support - **Target:** Large brokerages, charter fleets ### Pilot Program (Riviera Plaisance) - **Offer:** Free Tier 2 for 3 months (first 5 yachts) - **Commitment:** Feedback, case study participation - **Conversion:** 50% discount first year if adopted --- ## Output Format ### Deliverable 1: Pitch Deck **File:** `session-3-pitch-deck.md` (Markdown with Mermaid diagrams) **Structure:** ```markdown # NaviDocs Yacht Sales Pitch Deck ## Riviera Plaisance Presentation ### Slide 1: The €33,000 Question [Hook: warranty tracking ROI] ### Slide 2: Broker Documentation Pain [Market research from Session 1] ### Slide 3: NaviDocs Solution Overview [Feature highlights with icons] ### Slide 4: Warranty Tracking ROI [Calculator demo, €8K-€33K savings] ### Slide 5: Technical Architecture [Mermaid diagram: Home Assistant, offline mode] ### Slide 6: 4-Week Implementation Roadmap [Gantt chart from Session 2] ### Slide 7: Pilot Program Offer [Pricing, free trial, next steps] **Appendix: Demo Screenshots** [6 screens with annotations] ``` ### Deliverable 2: Demo Script **File:** `session-3-demo-script.md` **Structure:** ```markdown # NaviDocs Live Demo Script (5 Minutes) ## Setup Instructions - Browser: Chrome/Firefox - URL: https://demo.navidocs.app - Login: demo@rivieraplaisance.com / DemoPass123 - Pre-loaded yacht: "Azimut 55S" (€800K, 15 warranties) ## Screen-by-Screen Walkthrough ### [0:00-0:30] Dashboard **Action:** Show multi-yacht overview **Say:** "Broker dashboard shows all yachts, warranty status at a glance..." **Highlight:** Red badge on Azimut (warranty expiring in 28 days) ### [0:30-1:30] Yacht Detail **Action:** Click Azimut 55S **Say:** "€760K in active warranties tracked, system prevents €8K-€33K losses..." **Highlight:** Warranty timeline, document library [... continue for all 6 screens] ``` ### Deliverable 3: ROI Calculator **File:** `session-3-roi-calculator.html` (web app) or `.xlsx` (spreadsheet) **Implementation:** ```html NaviDocs ROI Calculator

NaviDocs Yacht Sales ROI Calculator

[... all input fields]

3-Year Savings: €

Break-Even: months

``` ### Deliverable 4: Sales Collateral Package **File:** `session-3-sales-collateral/` **Files:** - `one-pager.pdf` - Leave-behind document (1 page, visual) - `email-follow-up-template.md` - Post-meeting email - `pilot-agreement.md` - Free trial terms - `objection-handling.md` - Q&A playbook --- ## IF.TTT Compliance Checklist - [ ] All ROI calculations cite Session 1 market research - [ ] Demo script references actual NaviDocs features (verify against codebase) - [ ] Pricing strategy validated against competitor analysis (Session 1) - [ ] Technical architecture diagram matches Session 2 specs - [ ] Evidence artifacts stored in `/intelligence/session-3/` --- ## Success Criteria **Minimum Viable Output:** - 7-slide pitch deck (problem → solution → ROI → timeline → pricing) - 5-minute demo script with screen annotations - Working ROI calculator (web or spreadsheet) - Objection handling playbook (5+ objections) **Stretch Goals:** - Video demo recording (screencast with voiceover) - Interactive ROI calculator (embedded in pitch deck) - Animated architecture diagram (Mermaid with transitions) - Printed sales collateral (one-pager PDF) --- **Start Command:** Deploy to Claude Code Cloud after Session 2 complete **End Condition:** All deliverables committed to `dannystocker/navidocs` repo under `intelligence/session-3/`