dannystocker/navidocs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Add zero-context production-ready review prompts

Browse source 
- Codex: Security + architecture (SQL injection, auth, RBAC, code quality)
- Gemini: Performance + UX (bundle size, touch targets, marine environment)
- Self-contained with full context and audit commands
- Detailed report format templates
- Can paste directly into AI chat interfaces
This commit is contained in:
Danny Stocker 2025-11-14 16:33:28 +01:00
parent e178babe5c
commit c5388f745d
2 changed files with 802 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

331
CODEX_READY_TO_PASTE.txt Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
You are Codex GPT-5 High, tasked with a comprehensive security and architecture review of the NaviDocs boat management platform.
## CONTEXT
**Project:** NaviDocs - Premium boat documentation management for €800K-€1.5M yachts
**Codebase:** /home/setup/navidocs (Vue 3 + Express.js + SQLite)
**Branch:** navidocs-cloud-coordination
**Services:** Backend on port 8001, Frontend on port 3200
**Target Users:** Boat owners, captains, crew, management companies, yacht dealers
## YOUR MISSION
Perform a deep security and architecture review focusing on:
1. **Security vulnerabilities** (OWASP Top 10, SQL injection, XSS, auth bypasses)
2. **Architecture quality** (separation of concerns, code organization, maintainability)
3. **Code quality** (naming, error handling, complexity, best practices)
## STEP 1: RUN AUTOMATED AUDITS
Execute these commands and analyze output:
```bash
cd /home/setup/navidocs
# Security checks
npm audit --production # Dependency vulnerabilities
grep -r "db.prepare(\`\${" server/ --exclude-dir=node_modules # SQL injection (string interpolation)
grep -r 'db.prepare("' server/ | grep -v "?" | head -20 # SQL injection (no parameterization)
grep -r "api_key\|API_KEY\|password\|secret" server/ client/ --exclude-dir=node_modules | grep -v "\.env" | head -20 # Hardcoded secrets
git log --all --pretty=format: --name-only | grep "\.env$" # Exposed secrets in git history
# Authentication checks
grep -r "router\." server/routes/ | grep -v "authenticateToken" | grep -E "get\(|post\(|put\(|delete\(" | head -30 # Unprotected routes
# Code quality
find client/src/components -name "*.vue" -exec wc -l {} \; | awk '$1 > 300 {print $2 " (" $1 " lines)"}' | head -10 # Large components
find server/routes -name "*.js" -exec wc -l {} \; | awk '$1 > 200 {print $2 " (" $1 " lines)"}' | head -10 # Large route files (business logic in routes = antipattern)
# Database schema analysis
ls server/*.db 2>/dev/null || ls *.db 2>/dev/null || echo "No database found" # Find database file
# Then: sqlite3 <db-file> ".schema" | grep -E "CREATE TABLE|CREATE INDEX"
```
## STEP 2: MANUAL CODE REVIEW
**Key files to examine:**
**Backend (security critical):**
- `server/routes/*.js` - All route files
- `server/middleware/auth.js` - Authentication logic
- `server/db/db.js` - Database connection
- `server/index.js` - Server setup
**Frontend (architecture focus):**
- `client/src/router/index.js` - Route configuration
- `client/src/components/*.vue` - Component structure
- `client/src/views/*.vue` - Page components
**Look for:**
### CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUES 🔴
1. **SQL Injection:**
```javascript
// VULNERABLE
const stmt = db.prepare(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`)
const stmt = db.prepare("DELETE FROM items WHERE id = " + itemId)
// SAFE
const stmt = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?')
stmt.get(userId)
```
2. **Authentication Bypass:**
```javascript
// VULNERABLE - no auth check
router.delete('/api/inventory/:id', async (req, res) => {
// Anyone can delete items!
})
// SAFE
router.delete('/api/inventory/:id', authenticateToken, async (req, res) => {
// Only authenticated users
})
```
3. **File Upload Vulnerabilities:**
```javascript
// VULNERABLE - no size/type validation
const upload = multer({ dest: 'uploads/' })
// SAFE
const upload = multer({
dest: 'uploads/',
limits: { fileSize: 5 * 1024 * 1024 }, // 5MB max
fileFilter: (req, file, cb) => {
if (!['image/jpeg', 'image/png'].includes(file.mimetype)) {
return cb(new Error('Invalid file type'))
}
cb(null, true)
}
})
```
4. **Exposed Secrets:**
```javascript
// VULNERABLE
const API_KEY = 'sk-abc123secretkey'
// SAFE
const API_KEY = process.env.API_KEY
```
### ARCHITECTURE ISSUES 🟡
1. **Business Logic in Routes (should be in service layer)**
2. **God Components (>300 lines, should be split)**
3. **No RBAC (role-based access control for multi-stakeholder access)**
4. **Scattered State (should use Pinia store, not ref() in components)**
## STEP 3: GENERATE REPORT
Create: `/home/setup/navidocs/reviews/CODEX_SECURITY_ARCHITECTURE_REPORT.md`
**Format:**
```markdown
# Codex Security & Architecture Review - NaviDocs
**Reviewed:** [DATE]
**Model:** GPT-5 High
**Reviewer:** Codex
**Overall Security Rating:** X/10
**Overall Architecture Rating:** X/10
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraph summary of findings. Be direct about severity.]
**Critical Risks:**
- [List 3-5 most severe issues that could cause data breaches, data loss, or system compromise]
**Quick Wins:**
- [List 3-5 easy fixes with high security/quality impact]
---
## CRITICAL ISSUES 🔴 (Fix Immediately)
### 1. [Issue Name - e.g., SQL Injection in Maintenance Route]
**Severity:** CRITICAL (10/10)
**File:** `server/routes/maintenance.js:78`
**Impact:** Allows attackers to read/modify/delete entire database
**Vulnerable Code:**
\`\`\`javascript
const stmt = db.prepare(\`SELECT * FROM maintenance WHERE id = \${req.params.id}\`)
const result = stmt.get()
\`\`\`
**Attack Example:**
\`\`\`bash
curl "http://localhost:8001/api/maintenance/1; DROP TABLE users--"
# Result: Users table deleted
\`\`\`
**Fix:**
\`\`\`javascript
const stmt = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM maintenance WHERE id = ?')
const result = stmt.get(req.params.id)
\`\`\`
**Effort:** 2 minutes
**Priority:** IMMEDIATE (stop deployment until fixed)
---
[Continue for all CRITICAL issues...]
---
## HIGH PRIORITY ISSUES 🟡 (Fix Before Launch)
### 1. [Issue Name]
**Severity:** HIGH (7/10)
**File:** [path:line]
**Impact:** [description]
**Current Code:**
\`\`\`javascript
[code snippet]
\`\`\`
**Recommended Fix:**
\`\`\`javascript
[fixed code]
\`\`\`
**Effort:** [hours]
---
[Continue for all HIGH issues...]
---
## MEDIUM PRIORITY ISSUES ⚠️ (Fix Post-Launch)
[List with less detail, focus on patterns]
---
## Architecture Recommendations
### 1. Extract Business Logic to Service Layer
**Current (Antipattern):**
Routes contain 50-200 lines of business logic
**Recommended:**
\`\`\`javascript
// routes/expenses.js
router.post('/api/expenses', authenticateToken, async (req, res) => {
const expense = await ExpenseService.create(req.body, req.user)
res.json(expense)
})
// services/expense.service.js
class ExpenseService {
static async create(data, user) {
this.validate(data)
const splits = this.calculateSplits(data)
return this.save(data, splits, user)
}
}
\`\`\`
**Effort:** 8 hours (refactor all 5 route files)
---
## Security Checklist
- [ ] All database queries use parameterized statements
- [ ] All routes have authentication (except public endpoints)
- [ ] No secrets in code (all in .env)
- [ ] File uploads validated (size, type, magic bytes)
- [ ] JWT tokens expire (<1 hour)
- [ ] RBAC implemented (owner/captain/crew permissions)
- [ ] Input validation on all POST/PUT routes
- [ ] SQL injection: 0 vulnerabilities found
- [ ] XSS vulnerabilities: 0 found
- [ ] npm audit: 0 critical/high vulnerabilities
---
## Code Quality Metrics
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| SQL injection vulns | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Unauth'd routes | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Hardcoded secrets | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| npm audit critical | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Large components (>300 lines) | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Large routes (>200 lines) | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
---
## Total Effort Estimate
| Priority | Issues | Hours | Cost (€80/hr) |
|----------|--------|-------|---------------|
| Critical (🔴) | X | X hrs | €X |
| High (🟡) | X | X hrs | €X |
| Medium (⚠️) | X | X hrs | €X |
| **TOTAL** | **X** | **X hrs** | **€X** |
---
## Recommendations by Priority
**Week 1 (CRITICAL):**
1. [Fix item]
2. [Fix item]
**Week 2 (HIGH):**
1. [Fix item]
2. [Fix item]
**Post-Launch (MEDIUM):**
1. [Improvement item]
2. [Improvement item]
---
## Conclusion
[Final assessment. Be honest about severity. Don't sugarcoat if there are critical issues.]
**Safe to launch?** YES/NO (if NO, list blockers)
**Biggest risk:** [Single sentence describing #1 vulnerability]
**Fastest security win:** [Single fix with highest impact/effort ratio]
\`\`\`
---
## IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS
1. **Be thorough:** Scan ALL route files, not just samples
2. **Be specific:** Every issue needs file:line reference
3. **Be actionable:** Every issue needs before/after code example
4. **Be realistic:** Effort estimates should be accurate (consider testing time)
5. **Prioritize correctly:** CRITICAL = can be exploited remotely, HIGH = degrades security posture
## START YOUR REVIEW NOW
Begin with automated audit commands, then manual code review, then generate the comprehensive report above.
Focus on finding vulnerabilities that could cause:
- Data breaches (unauthorized access to boat/owner data)
- Data loss (SQL injection deletion)
- Authentication bypass (accessing other users' boats)
- File system attacks (malicious file uploads)
Good luck! 🔒

471
GEMINI_READY_TO_PASTE.txt Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,471 @@
You are Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, tasked with a comprehensive performance and UX review of the NaviDocs boat management platform.
## CONTEXT
**Project:** NaviDocs - Premium boat documentation management for €800K-€1.5M yachts
**Codebase:** /home/setup/navidocs (Vue 3 + Vite, Express.js, SQLite)
**Branch:** navidocs-cloud-coordination
**Services:** Backend on port 8001, Frontend on port 3200
**Target Users:** Boat owners, captains, crew using tablets/phones **in marine environments** (bright sunlight, gloves, wet hands, boat vibrations)
## YOUR MISSION
Perform a deep performance and UX review focusing on:
1. **Performance optimization** (bundle size, lazy loading, database indexes, caching)
2. **User experience** (touch targets, contrast, accessibility, mobile responsiveness)
3. **Marine environment usability** (glove operation, sunlight readability, simplicity)
## STEP 1: RUN AUTOMATED AUDITS
Execute these commands and analyze output:
```bash
cd /home/setup/navidocs
# Frontend Performance
npm run build # Build production bundle
du -sh dist/ # Total bundle size (target: <500KB gzipped)
find dist/assets -name "*.js" -exec du -h {} \; | sort -h | tail -5 # Largest JS chunks
grep -r "import.*from.*views" client/src/router/ | head -20 # Check for lazy loading
# Component Size Analysis
find client/src/components -name "*.vue" -exec wc -l {} \; | awk '$1 > 300 {print $2 " (" $1 " lines)"}' | head -10 # Large components (performance risk)
find client/src -name "*.vue" -exec wc -l {} \; | awk '$1 > 500 {print $2 " (" $1 " lines - GOD COMPONENT!)"}' # God components
# Database Performance
ls server/*.db 2>/dev/null || ls *.db 2>/dev/null # Find database
# Then: sqlite3 <db-file> "SELECT name FROM sqlite_master WHERE type='index';" | wc -l # Count indexes
# Backend Performance
grep -r "\.all(" server/routes/ | wc -l # Count .all() queries (should use pagination)
grep -r "for.*of\|forEach" server/routes/ -A 3 | grep "db.prepare" | wc -l # N+1 query risk
# UX/Accessibility
grep -r "width.*px\|height.*px" client/src/components/ | grep -E "width: [1-4][0-9]px|height: [1-4][0-9]px" | head -20 # Small touch targets (<50px)
grep -r "<button\|<div.*@click" client/src/components/ | grep -v "aria-label" | wc -l # Missing ARIA labels
grep -r "<img" client/src | grep -v "alt=" | head -10 # Images without alt text
grep -r "font-size.*px" client/src | grep -E "[0-9]{1}px|1[0-5]px" | head -20 # Small fonts (<16px)
```
## STEP 2: MANUAL CODE REVIEW
**Key files to examine:**
**Performance Critical:**
- `client/src/router/index.js` - Lazy loading routes?
- `client/vite.config.js` - Build optimization?
- `server/routes/*.js` - Database query efficiency?
- `client/src/components/*Module.vue` - Large components causing jank?
**UX Critical:**
- All `.vue` components - Touch target sizes, font sizes, contrast
- `client/src/views/*.vue` - Mobile responsiveness
- Error handling in components - User-friendly messages?
**Look for:**
### PERFORMANCE ISSUES ⚡
**1. Large Bundle Size (>500KB):**
```javascript
// BAD: All routes loaded upfront
import DocumentView from './views/DocumentView.vue'
const routes = [{ path: '/documents', component: DocumentView }]
// GOOD: Lazy loading
const routes = [{
path: '/documents',
component: () => import('./views/DocumentView.vue')
}]
```
**2. N+1 Database Queries:**
```javascript
// BAD: Query in loop (1 + N queries)
const boats = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM boats').all()
for (const boat of boats) {
const items = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM inventory WHERE boat_id = ?').all(boat.id)
boat.inventory = items
}
// GOOD: Single JOIN query
const stmt = db.prepare(`
SELECT boats.*, inventory.*
FROM boats
LEFT JOIN inventory ON inventory.boat_id = boats.id
`)
```
**3. Missing Database Indexes:**
```sql
-- BAD: No index on foreign key (slow queries)
CREATE TABLE inventory (boat_id INTEGER, ...)
-- GOOD: Index added
CREATE INDEX idx_inventory_boat_id ON inventory(boat_id);
```
**4. No Pagination:**
```javascript
// BAD: Returns all 10,000 items
router.get('/api/inventory/:boatId', async (req, res) => {
const items = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM inventory WHERE boat_id = ?').all(boatId)
res.json(items) // Could be 10MB response!
})
// GOOD: Paginated
const { limit = 50, offset = 0 } = req.query
const items = db.prepare('SELECT * FROM inventory WHERE boat_id = ? LIMIT ? OFFSET ?').all(boatId, limit, offset)
```
### UX ISSUES 🎨
**1. Touch Targets Too Small (<60px for marine environment):**
```vue
<!-- BAD: 32×32px button (impossible with gloves) -->
<button class="delete-btn" style="width: 32px; height: 32px">
<TrashIcon />
</button>
<!-- GOOD: 60×60px minimum -->
<button class="delete-btn" style="min-width: 60px; min-height: 60px; padding: 16px;">
<TrashIcon />
</button>
```
**2. Low Contrast (unreadable in sunlight):**
```vue
<!-- BAD: Light text on light background (contrast ratio 2:1) -->
<p style="color: #999; background: #eee;">Equipment name</p>
<!-- GOOD: High contrast (7:1 for WCAG AAA) -->
<p style="color: #1E3A8A; background: #fff;">Equipment name</p>
```
**3. Small Fonts (<24px for critical metrics):**
```vue
<!-- BAD: Small temperature display -->
<div class="temperature" style="font-size: 16px;">24°C</div>
<!-- GOOD: Garmin-style large metric -->
<div class="temperature" style="font-size: 48px; font-weight: 700;">24°C</div>
```
**4. Missing Loading States:**
```vue
<!-- BAD: No feedback during API call -->
<button @click="submitForm">Submit</button>
<!-- GOOD: Loading indicator -->
<button @click="submitForm" :disabled="isLoading">
{{ isLoading ? 'Submitting...' : 'Submit' }}
</button>
```
**5. Missing ARIA Labels:**
```vue
<!-- BAD: Screen readers can't identify action -->
<button @click="deleteItem"><TrashIcon /></button>
<!-- GOOD: Accessible -->
<button @click="deleteItem" aria-label="Delete item">
<TrashIcon />
</button>
```
## STEP 3: LIGHTHOUSE ANALYSIS (if services running)
If you can access the running app (http://localhost:3200), test these critical flows:
**Test Flow 1: Dashboard Load**
- Navigate to http://localhost:3200/
- Does it load in <2 seconds?
- Are there loading skeletons?
- Is data fetched efficiently (not 20 separate API calls)?
**Test Flow 2: Inventory with Photos**
- Navigate to inventory module
- Upload photos - is there progress bar?
- Scroll long list - is it smooth (60fps)?
- Search items - is it debounced?
**Test Flow 3: Mobile Simulation**
- Resize browser to 375×667 (iPhone SE)
- Can you tap all buttons easily?
- Is text readable without zooming?
- No horizontal scrolling?
## STEP 4: GENERATE REPORT
Create: `/home/setup/navidocs/reviews/GEMINI_PERFORMANCE_UX_REPORT.md`
**Format:**
```markdown
# Gemini Performance & UX Review - NaviDocs
**Reviewed:** [DATE]
**Model:** Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
**Reviewer:** Gemini
**Performance Rating:** X/10
**UX Rating:** X/10
**Marine Usability Rating:** X/10
---
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs summarizing key findings]
**Performance Bottlenecks:**
- [Top 3 performance issues slowing the app]
**UX Blockers for Marine Environment:**
- [Top 3 UX issues making app unusable on boats]
**Quick Wins:**
- [3-5 easy fixes with massive impact]
---
## PERFORMANCE ISSUES ⚡
### 🔴 Critical (Blocks User Action)
#### 1. [Issue Name - e.g., Bundle Size 789KB (58% too large)]
**Impact:** 5-8 second load on 3G connection (marina WiFi)
**Measurement:** \`du -sh dist/\` = 789KB gzipped
**Target:** <500KB gzipped
**Root Cause:** All routes loaded upfront, no code splitting
**Current Code:**
\`\`\`javascript
// client/src/router/index.js
import DocumentView from './views/DocumentView.vue'
import InventoryView from './views/InventoryView.vue'
// ... 9 routes imported upfront
\`\`\`
**Fix:**
\`\`\`javascript
const routes = [
{ path: '/documents', component: () => import('./views/DocumentView.vue') },
{ path: '/inventory', component: () => import('./views/InventoryView.vue') }
// Lazy load all routes
]
\`\`\`
**Expected Improvement:** Bundle size → 320KB (59% reduction)
**Effort:** 30 minutes
**Priority:** CRITICAL
---
[Continue for all CRITICAL performance issues...]
---
### 🟡 High Priority (Degrades Experience)
#### 1. [Issue Name]
**Impact:** [description]
**File:** [path:line]
**Measurement:** [metric]
**Fix:**
\`\`\`javascript
[code example]
\`\`\`
**Effort:** [hours]
---
## UX ISSUES 🎨
### 🔴 Critical (Unusable in Marine Environment)
#### 1. Touch Targets Too Small (32×32px, need 60×60px)
**Impact:** Impossible to tap with sailing gloves
**Marine Context:** Yacht owners wear gloves 60% of time (wet, cold, rough seas)
**Files Affected:**
- `client/src/components/ContactsModule.vue:45` - Delete icon (32×32px)
- `client/src/components/InventoryModule.vue:89` - Edit button (40×40px)
- `client/src/components/ExpenseModule.vue:123` - Approve button (36×36px)
**Current Code:**
\`\`\`vue
<button class="icon-btn" style="width: 32px; height: 32px">
<TrashIcon />
</button>
\`\`\`
**Fix:**
\`\`\`vue
<button class="icon-btn" style="min-width: 60px; min-height: 60px; padding: 16px;">
<TrashIcon class="w-6 h-6" />
</button>
\`\`\`
**Expected Improvement:** Tap success rate: 40% → 98%
**Effort:** 15 minutes (update 12 buttons)
**Priority:** CRITICAL for marine use
---
[Continue for all CRITICAL UX issues...]
---
### 🟡 High Priority (Accessibility Issue)
#### 1. Missing ARIA Labels (14 icon-only buttons)
**Impact:** Screen readers can't identify button actions
**WCAG Compliance:** Fails WCAG 2.1 Level A (4.1.2 Name, Role, Value)
**Files:** [list 5-10 worst examples]
**Fix Pattern:**
\`\`\`vue
<button aria-label="Delete inventory item" @click="deleteItem">
<TrashIcon />
</button>
\`\`\`
**Effort:** 30 minutes
**Priority:** HIGH (legal requirement in EU)
---
## QUICK WINS (High Impact, Low Effort)
| Fix | Impact | Effort | ROI | Priority |
|-----|--------|--------|-----|----------|
| Add database indexes | -80% query time | 30 min | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Week 1 |
| Increase touch targets to 60px | Marine usability | 15 min | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Week 1 |
| Enable Vite gzip compression | -40% bundle size | 5 min | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Week 1 |
| Add loading skeletons | +20% perceived speed | 1 hr | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Week 1 |
| Lazy load routes | -50% initial load | 30 min | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | Week 1 |
---
## LIGHTHOUSE SCORE PROJECTION
| Metric | Current (Estimated) | After Quick Wins | After All Fixes | Target |
|--------|---------------------|------------------|-----------------|--------|
| Performance | 68 | 85 | 92 | >90 |
| Accessibility | 81 | 88 | 96 | >90 |
| Best Practices | 87 | 92 | 95 | >90 |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | 100 | >90 |
---
## MARINE ENVIRONMENT USABILITY
**Current Issues:**
- ❌ Touch targets too small for gloves (32-40px vs 60px needed)
- ❌ Low contrast (unreadable in direct sunlight)
- ❌ Small fonts for critical metrics (16px vs 48px needed)
- ⚠️ Glass morphism may cause lag on older tablets
**Recommendations:**
1. **Increase all touch targets to 60×60px minimum**
2. **High contrast mode by default** (Navy #1E3A8A on White #FFF = 8.5:1 ratio)
3. **Large Garmin-style metrics** (32-48px for numbers like temperature, wind speed)
4. **Test backdrop-filter performance** (glass effects can drop to 30fps on budget tablets)
---
## CODE QUALITY METRICS (UX-Impacting)
| Metric | Value | Target | Status |
|--------|-------|--------|--------|
| Bundle size (gzipped) | XKB | <500KB | ❌/✅ |
| Largest component | X lines | <300 lines | ❌/✅ |
| God components (>500 lines) | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Touch targets <60px | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Missing ARIA labels | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Low contrast elements | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
| Database indexes | X | >15 | ❌/✅ |
| N+1 queries | X | 0 | ❌/✅ |
---
## TOTAL EFFORT ESTIMATE
| Priority | Issues | Hours | Cost (€80/hr) |
|----------|--------|-------|---------------|
| Critical (🔴) | X | X hrs | €X |
| High (🟡) | X | X hrs | €X |
| Medium (⚠️) | X | X hrs | €X |
| **TOTAL** | **X** | **X hrs** | **€X** |
---
## IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
**Week 1 (Quick Wins - 8 hours):**
1. Add database indexes (30 min)
2. Increase touch targets to 60px (15 min)
3. Enable gzip compression (5 min)
4. Lazy load routes (30 min)
5. Add loading skeletons (1 hr)
6. Fix N+1 queries (2 hrs)
7. Add pagination to large lists (2 hrs)
8. Fix critical contrast issues (1 hr)
**Week 2 (High Priority - 12 hours):**
1. Add ARIA labels (2 hrs)
2. Keyboard navigation (3 hrs)
3. Mobile responsive fixes (4 hrs)
4. Performance monitoring (2 hrs)
5. Image optimization (1 hr)
**Week 3 (Medium Priority - 16 hours):**
1. Component refactoring (break up god components)
2. State management (centralize in Pinia)
3. Animation optimization
4. Advanced caching
---
## CONCLUSION
NaviDocs has solid architecture but needs optimization for:
1. **Marine environment** (touch targets, contrast, font sizes)
2. **Performance at scale** (bundle size, database queries, pagination)
3. **Accessibility** (ARIA, keyboard nav, screen readers)
**Most Critical Fix:** Increase touch targets to 60×60px (15 minutes, massive usability improvement for gloves)
**Biggest Performance Win:** Add database indexes + lazy load routes (1 hour, 10× query speedup + 50% faster initial load)
**Safe to launch?** YES, but fix critical issues first (Week 1 quick wins = 8 hours)
**Overall Assessment:** 7.5/10 (Good foundation, needs polish for premium yacht market expectations)
\`\`\`
---
## IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS
1. **Test in marine context:** Imagine using this on a boat (bright sun, gloves, motion)
2. **Be specific:** File:line references for every issue
3. **Be actionable:** Before/after code for every fix
4. **Measure impact:** Provide metrics (bundle size reduction, query speedup, etc.)
5. **Prioritize for users:** Critical = blocks real use, High = degrades experience
## START YOUR REVIEW NOW
Run automated audits, analyze code, test flows (if services running), generate comprehensive report above.
Focus on:
- Performance (make it fast)
- Usability (make it easy)
- Marine environment (make it work on boats)
Good luck! ⚡