diff --git a/AUTONOMOUS-COORDINATION-STATUS.md b/AUTONOMOUS-COORDINATION-STATUS.md
index e825575..240f848 100644
--- a/AUTONOMOUS-COORDINATION-STATUS.md
+++ b/AUTONOMOUS-COORDINATION-STATUS.md
@@ -10,14 +10,16 @@
 | Session | Agent ID Range | Status | Progress | Outputs |
 |---------|---------------|--------|----------|---------|
 | Session 1 | S1-H01 to S1-H10 | 🟡 READY | 0/10 agents | `intelligence/session-1/` |
-| Session 2 | S2-H01 to S2-H10 | 🟡 READY | 0/10 agents | `intelligence/session-2/` |
+| Session 2 | S2-H0A to S2-H10 | 🟢 ACTIVE (Helper) | 4/15 agents | `intelligence/session-2/` |
 | Session 3 | S3-H01 to S3-H10 | 🟡 READY | 0/10 agents | `intelligence/session-3/` |
-| Session 4 | S4-H01 to S4-H10 | 🟡 READY | 0/10 agents | `intelligence/session-4/` |
-| Session 5 | S5-H01 to S5-H10 | 🟡 READY | 0/20 guardians | `intelligence/session-5/` |
+| Session 4 | S4-H0A to S4-H10 | 🟢 ACTIVE (Helper) | 4/14 agents | `intelligence/session-4/` |
+| Session 5 | S5-H0A to S5-H10 | 🟢 ACTIVE (QA) | 3/13 agents | `intelligence/session-5/` |
 
 **Status Legend:**
 - 🟡 READY - Session initialized, waiting to start
 - 🟢 ACTIVE - Session running, agents working
+- 🟢 ACTIVE (Helper) - Session assisting other sessions while waiting
+- 🟢 ACTIVE (QA) - Session providing quality assurance support
 - 🔵 BLOCKED - Waiting for dependencies from other sessions
 - ✅ COMPLETE - All outputs delivered
 
@@ -49,20 +51,37 @@ Next: Session 2 unblocked
 
 ---
 
-### **Session 2: Technical Integration**
+### **Session 2: Technical Integration + Helper Agents**
 
-**Current Task:** Codebase analysis + sticky feature architecture
+**Current Task:** PHASE 1 - Helper agents assisting Sessions 1 & 3 (START NOW)
 
-**Instructions:**
-1. **First:** Agent 1 (S2-H01) analyzes NaviDocs codebase (NO dependency on Session 1)
-2. **Parallel:** Agents 2-9 research technical solutions (inventory, cameras, maintenance, etc.)
-3. **When Session 1 completes:** Poll for `intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md`
-4. **Then:** Agent 10 synthesizes with Session 1 pain point priorities
-5. Output to `intelligence/session-2/` (architecture.md, integration-specs.md, handoff.md)
+**IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (Agents 0A, 0B, 0C, 0D):**
+1. **Agent 0A (CONTINUOUS):** Technical validation assistant
+   - Verify competitor tech stacks for Session 1
+   - Check API availability (YachtWorld, Boat Trader, etc.)
+   - Validate technical feasibility of Session 3 UX proposals
+2. **Agent 0B (CONTINUOUS):** Citation automation
+   - Generate SHA-256 hashes for Session 1 web URLs
+   - Verify URL accessibility (flag broken links)
+   - Auto-generate IF.TTT-compliant citation JSON
+3. **Agent 0C (CONTINUOUS):** Web scraping assistant
+   - Extract competitor feature lists, pricing tables
+   - Parse industry reports for Session 1
+   - Create structured competitor-data.json
+4. **Agent 0D (PREP WORK):** ROI calculator backend
+   - Build generic calculator framework NOW
+   - Ready to plug in Session 1 data when it arrives
+   - Prepare chart generation and export functionality
+
+**PHASE 2 - Technical Architecture (WAIT FOR SESSION 1):**
+5. **When Session 1 completes:** Poll for `intelligence/session-1/session-1-handoff.md`
+6. **Agents 1-9 + 3A + 7A:** Codebase analysis + feature design (11 agents)
+7. **Agent 10:** Synthesize with Session 1 pain point priorities
+8. Output to `intelligence/session-2/` (architecture.md, integration-specs.md, handoff.md)
 
 **Dependencies:**
-- **Agent 1 task:** NONE (start immediately)
-- **Agent 10 synthesis:** Session 1 complete
+- **Agents 0A-0D:** NONE (start immediately - assist Sessions 1 & 3)
+- **Agents 1-9 + 3A + 7A + Agent 10:** Session 1 complete
 
 **Polling Command:**
 ```bash
@@ -103,20 +122,41 @@ fi
 
 ---
 
-### **Session 4: Implementation Planning**
+### **Session 4: Implementation Planning + Helper Agents**
 
-**Current Task:** Generic sprint planning + roadmap templates
+**Current Task:** PHASE 1 - Helper agents providing project management support (START NOW)
 
-**Instructions:**
-1. **Parallel:** Week agents research sprint best practices, roadmap templates
-2. **When Sessions 1+2+3 complete:** Poll for handoff files
-3. **Then:** Week agents create detailed sprint plans with feature priorities from Session 1
-4. **Finally:** Agent 10 creates integrated 4-week roadmap
-5. Output to `intelligence/session-4/` (sprint-plan.md, roadmap.md, handoff.md)
+**IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (Agents 0A, 0B, 0C, 0D):**
+1. **Agent 0A (CONTINUOUS - Every 5 minutes):** Research coordination dashboard
+   - Track Session 1 agent progress (7/10 complete, etc.)
+   - Monitor deliverable status (market-analysis.md: COMPLETE, etc.)
+   - Predict completion times for all sessions
+   - Detect blockers early (agent stuck, over-budget, etc.)
+2. **Agent 0B (CONTINUOUS):** Citation quality checker
+   - Pre-validate Session 1, 2, 3 citations BEFORE Session 5
+   - Check IF.TTT compliance (citation_id, sources, confidence, SHA-256)
+   - Flag issues immediately (single-source claims, missing hashes, etc.)
+   - Faster feedback loop than waiting for Session 5 validation
+3. **Agent 0C (PREP WORK):** Demo script structure
+   - Research winning demo flows (problem → solution → demo → ROI → close)
+   - Create generic template with placeholders for Session 1 data
+   - Research yacht owner objections (cost, complexity, time)
+   - Ready to fill with Session 1 findings when available
+4. **Agent 0D (CONTINUOUS - Every 5 minutes):** Cross-session dependency tracker
+   - Visual dependency graph (Mermaid) of all sessions
+   - Critical path identification (slowest session = bottleneck)
+   - Real-time completion predictions
+   - Parallel work opportunity detection
+
+**PHASE 2 - Implementation Planning (WAIT FOR SESSIONS 1+2+3):**
+5. **When Sessions 1+2+3 complete:** Poll for handoff files
+6. **Agents 1-9:** Create detailed 4-week sprint plan with feature priorities
+7. **Agent 10:** Synthesize integrated roadmap
+8. Output to `intelligence/session-4/` (sprint-plan.md, roadmap.md, handoff.md)
 
 **Dependencies:**
-- **Week 1-4 generic planning:** NONE (start immediately)
-- **Detailed feature breakdown:** Sessions 1+2+3 complete
+- **Agents 0A-0D:** NONE (start immediately - assist all sessions)
+- **Agents 1-10:** Sessions 1+2+3 complete
 
 **Polling Command:**
 ```bash
@@ -131,22 +171,36 @@ fi
 
 ---
 
-### **Session 5: Guardian Validation**
+### **Session 5: Guardian Validation + Active Quality Assurance**
 
-**Current Task:** Guardian methodology review + evaluation criteria prep
+**Current Task:** PHASE 1 - Active QA Partner (NO DEPENDENCIES - START NOW)
 
-**Instructions:**
-1. **Parallel:** Guardians 1-12 + IF.sam facets review IF.TTT framework, prepare evaluation criteria
-2. **When Sessions 1+2+3+4 complete:** Poll for handoff files
-3. **Then:** Guardians review complete intelligence dossier
-4. **IF.sam Debate:** 8 facets debate findings (Light Side vs Dark Side)
-5. **Vote:** Agent 10 tallies consensus (need >80% approval)
-6. **ESCALATE:** If <80%, flag for human review
-7. Output to `intelligence/session-5/` (complete-intelligence-dossier.md, guardian-vote.md, consensus-report.md)
+**IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (Agents 0A, 0B, 0C):**
+1. **Agent 0A (CRITICAL - First 10 minutes):** Deploy `EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md`
+   - Citation format templates (IF.TTT compliance)
+   - Evidence quality scoring rubric (primary/secondary/tertiary sources)
+   - Multi-source verification examples
+   - Commit to coordination branch → Sessions 1-4 read immediately
+2. **Agent 0B (CONTINUOUS - Every 5 minutes):** Real-time quality monitoring
+   - Poll `intelligence/session-*/` for new commits
+   - Review citations for IF.TTT compliance
+   - Create `QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md` (updated every 5 minutes)
+   - Sessions 1-4 read feedback → fix issues proactively
+3. **Agent 0C (PREP WORK):** Guardian briefing templates
+   - Create 20 guardian-specific briefing templates
+   - Consensus prediction formula
+   - Voting criteria checklists
+
+**PHASE 2 - Final Validation (WAIT FOR SESSIONS 1+2+3+4):**
+4. **When Sessions 1+2+3+4 complete:** Poll for handoff files
+5. **Agents 1-9:** Extract evidence, validate claims, compile citations
+6. **Agent 10:** Guardian Council vote (need >80% consensus)
+7. **ESCALATE:** If <80% approval, flag for human review
+8. Output to `intelligence/session-5/` (complete-intelligence-dossier.md, guardian-vote.md)
 
 **Dependencies:**
-- **Methodology review:** NONE (start immediately)
-- **Dossier validation:** Sessions 1+2+3+4 complete
+- **Agent 0A, 0B, 0C:** NONE (start immediately - assist Sessions 1-4)
+- **Agents 1-10:** Sessions 1+2+3+4 complete
 
 **Polling Command:**
 ```bash
diff --git a/CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md b/CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md
index 64e2195..2de54b9 100644
--- a/CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md
+++ b/CLOUD_SESSION_2_TECHNICAL_INTEGRATION.md
@@ -44,6 +44,146 @@ Design technical architecture for **sticky daily-use features** (inventory track
 
 ---
 
+## PHASE 1: Helper Agents (START IMMEDIATELY - ASSIST SESSIONS 1 & 3)
+
+**Mission:** While waiting for Session 1 market research and Session 3 UX/sales work, provide active technical assistance to accelerate their completion.
+
+**NO DEPENDENCIES:** All Phase 1 agents can start immediately (no need to wait for other sessions).
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0A: Technical Validation Assistant (CRITICAL)
+**AGENT ID:** S2-H0A
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Session 1 (Market Research):**
+- **Verify competitor tech stacks:** When Session 1 identifies competitors (YachtWorld, Boat Trader, etc.), validate their API documentation
+- **Check API availability:** Research if competitor APIs are public, require auth, or need partner agreements
+- **Document API contracts:** Create structured summaries of competitor API capabilities for Session 1 citations
+
+**Assist Session 3 (UX/Sales):**
+- **Technical feasibility checks:** When Session 3 proposes UI features, confirm if NaviDocs tech stack supports them
+- **Performance estimates:** Provide load time estimates for proposed features (based on NaviDocs current architecture)
+- **Mobile compatibility:** Validate if proposed UX patterns work on mobile (Vue 3 + PWA constraints)
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-2/helper-technical-validations.md` (updated in real-time as Sessions 1 & 3 work)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0B: Citation Automation (SHA-256 Hash Generation)
+**AGENT ID:** S2-H0B
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Session 1 (Market Research):**
+- **Generate SHA-256 hashes:** When Session 1 cites web URLs, automatically fetch and hash content
+- **Verify URL accessibility:** Check if cited URLs return 200 OK (flag broken links immediately)
+- **Extract structured data:** Parse web pages for key data points (pricing, features, market stats)
+- **Create citation JSON:** Auto-generate IF.TTT-compliant citation entries with hashes
+
+**Example Workflow:**
+```bash
+# Session 1 Agent 3 cites: "YachtWorld pricing: €25/month"
+# Agent 0B immediately:
+1. Fetches https://yachtworld.com/pricing
+2. Generates SHA-256: a1b2c3d4e5f6...
+3. Extracts pricing table
+4. Creates citation JSON:
+{
+  "citation_id": "if://citation/yachtworld-pricing-nov2025",
+  "claim": "YachtWorld charges €25/month for yacht management",
+  "sources": [{
+    "type": "web",
+    "url": "https://yachtworld.com/pricing",
+    "sha256": "a1b2c3d4e5f6...",
+    "accessed": "2025-11-13",
+    "quality": "primary",
+    "credibility": 9
+  }],
+  "status": "verified",
+  "confidence_score": 0.95
+}
+```
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-2/auto-citations.json` (append as Session 1 works)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0C: Web Scraping Assistant (Structured Data Extraction)
+**AGENT ID:** S2-H0C
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Session 1 (Market Research):**
+- **Extract competitor feature lists:** Scrape competitor websites for feature comparisons
+- **Pricing table extraction:** Parse pricing pages into structured JSON
+- **Market report parsing:** Extract key stats from industry reports (PDFs, web pages)
+- **Automated data validation:** Cross-check data across multiple sources (detect conflicts)
+
+**Example:**
+```yaml
+# Session 1 Agent 5 researching competitors
+# Agent 0C scrapes:
+- YachtWorld: Features (inventory, CRM, MLS integration)
+- Boat Trader: Pricing (€15/month basic, €45/month pro)
+- Dockwa: User counts (50K+ marinas, 250K+ boaters)
+
+# Output: intelligence/session-2/competitor-data.json
+{
+  "yachtworld": {
+    "features": ["inventory", "crm", "mls_integration"],
+    "pricing": {"basic": 25, "pro": 75},
+    "users": "unknown"
+  },
+  "boat_trader": {
+    "features": ["listings", "leads", "analytics"],
+    "pricing": {"basic": 15, "pro": 45},
+    "users": "unknown"
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-2/competitor-data.json` (structured data for Session 1 & 3 use)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0D: ROI Calculator Backend (Build Before Session 1 Data Arrives)
+**AGENT ID:** S2-H0D
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Build Generic ROI Calculator Framework:**
+- **Formula engine:** Create generic calculator that accepts variables (warranty_savings, time_saved, resale_value_increase)
+- **Input validation:** Define valid ranges for each variable (prevent unrealistic claims)
+- **Visualization logic:** Prepare chart generation code (bar charts, pie charts for ROI breakdown)
+- **Export functionality:** Generate PDF/Excel exports of ROI calculations
+
+**Example Structure:**
+```javascript
+// server/services/roi-calculator.service.js
+class ROICalculator {
+  calculate(inputs) {
+    // inputs: { warranty_savings, time_saved_hours, resale_value_increase }
+    const warranty_roi = inputs.warranty_savings * 12; // Annual savings
+    const time_roi = inputs.time_saved_hours * 50; // €50/hour labor cost
+    const resale_roi = inputs.resale_value_increase;
+
+    return {
+      total_annual_roi: warranty_roi + time_roi,
+      resale_value_lift: resale_roi,
+      payback_period_months: this.calculatePayback(inputs),
+      confidence: this.calculateConfidence(inputs)
+    };
+  }
+}
+```
+
+**When Session 1 Data Arrives:**
+- Agent 0D plugs in Session 1 findings (€8K-€33K warranty savings, etc.)
+- Generates final ROI report for Session 3 pitch deck
+- Creates interactive calculator UI for demos
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-2/roi-calculator-framework.js` (ready for Session 1 data integration)
+
+---
+
 
 ## Agent Identity & Check-In Protocol
 
diff --git a/CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md b/CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md
index 5705d4e..960ed88 100644
--- a/CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md
+++ b/CLOUD_SESSION_4_IMPLEMENTATION_PLANNING.md
@@ -35,6 +35,188 @@ Create detailed 4-week implementation plan with task breakdown, dependencies, ac
 
 ---
 
+## PHASE 1: Helper Agents (START IMMEDIATELY - ASSIST SESSIONS 1 & 3)
+
+**Mission:** While waiting for Sessions 1+2+3 to complete, provide active project management assistance to accelerate overall coordination and quality.
+
+**NO DEPENDENCIES:** All Phase 1 agents can start immediately (no need to wait for other sessions).
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0A: Research Coordination Dashboard (Real-Time Progress Tracking)
+**AGENT ID:** S4-H0A
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Session 1 (Market Research):**
+- **Agent progress tracker:** Monitor which of the 10 Session 1 agents have completed their tasks
+- **Completion status:** Track deliverables (market-analysis.md, citations.json, handoff.md)
+- **Blocker detection:** Identify if any Session 1 agent is stuck or over-budget
+- **Estimated completion:** Predict when Session 1 will finish based on current progress
+
+**Dashboard Format:**
+```yaml
+# intelligence/session-4/coordination-dashboard.md
+## Session 1 Progress (Updated Every 5 Minutes)
+
+Agents Complete: 7/10 (70%)
+Deliverables:
+  - market-analysis.md: ✅ COMPLETE (87KB)
+  - session-1-citations.json: 🟡 IN PROGRESS (43 citations so far)
+  - session-1-handoff.md: ⏳ PENDING (Agent 10 not started)
+
+Estimated Completion: 15 minutes
+
+Blockers: None
+
+Token Usage: $12.50 / $15.00 budget (83% consumed)
+```
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-4/coordination-dashboard.md` (updated every 5 minutes)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0B: Citation Quality Checker (Pre-Validate Before Session 5)
+**AGENT ID:** S4-H0B
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Sessions 1, 2, 3 (Pre-Validation):**
+- **Citation format check:** Validate citations follow IF.TTT schema (citation_id, sources, confidence_score, etc.)
+- **Source quality scoring:** Verify primary sources have 9-10 credibility (not tertiary)
+- **Multi-source validation:** Check high-confidence claims (≥0.9) have ≥2 sources
+- **SHA-256 verification:** Confirm web URLs have SHA-256 hashes (tamper detection)
+- **Broken link detection:** Test cited URLs return 200 OK (flag dead links)
+
+**Example Feedback:**
+```yaml
+# intelligence/session-4/citation-quality-report.md
+
+## Session 1 Citation Quality (43 citations reviewed)
+
+✅ PASS (38 citations):
+  - All have if://citation/ IDs
+  - Primary sources properly cited
+  - ≥2 sources for high-confidence claims
+
+⚠️ NEEDS ATTENTION (5 citations):
+  1. Citation: if://citation/broker-count-med
+     - Issue: Single source (need 2nd corroboration)
+     - Recommendation: Add Boat International report as 2nd source
+
+  2. Citation: if://citation/warranty-costs
+     - Issue: Missing SHA-256 hash for YachtWorld URL
+     - Recommendation: Run `sha256sum` on fetched page
+
+  3. Citation: if://citation/competitor-pricing
+     - Issue: Confidence 0.95 but only secondary sources (credibility 7-8)
+     - Recommendation: Lower confidence to 0.85 or find primary source
+```
+
+**Value:** Catch citation issues BEFORE Session 5 validation (faster feedback loop, less rework)
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-4/citation-quality-report.md` (updated as sessions work)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0C: Demo Script Structure (Outline Before Session 1 Data)
+**AGENT ID:** S4-H0C
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Assist Session 3 (UX/Sales):**
+- **Demo flow research:** Study winning software demo structures (problem → solution → demo → ROI → close)
+- **Generic outline:** Create demo script template with placeholders for Session 1 data
+- **Objection handling:** Research common yacht owner objections (cost, complexity, time investment)
+- **Storytelling techniques:** Identify emotional hooks (peace of mind, warranty savings, resale value)
+
+**Generic Demo Outline (Before Session 1 Data):**
+```markdown
+# NaviDocs Demo Script (Template)
+
+## 1. Opening (2 min)
+- Pain point: "[INSERT: Top pain point from Session 1]"
+- Teaser: "What if you could [INSERT: Key benefit]?"
+
+## 2. Problem Deep Dive (3 min)
+- Story: "[INSERT: Yacht owner story from Session 1]"
+- Consequence: "Without NaviDocs, owners lose [INSERT: €X savings]"
+
+## 3. Solution Demo (10 min)
+- Feature 1: [INSERT: Sticky feature from Session 2]
+  - Show: [Screen recording placeholder]
+  - Benefit: [INSERT: Time/money saved]
+
+## 4. ROI Reveal (5 min)
+- Calculator: [INSERT: Session 1 warranty savings data]
+- Comparison: "That's [X] hours saved per year"
+
+## 5. Close (2 min)
+- Call to action: "Sign up for Riviera pilot"
+- Objection handling: [INSERT: Top 3 objections from Session 1]
+```
+
+**When Session 1 Completes:**
+- Agent 0C fills placeholders with real data
+- Creates final polished demo script for Session 3
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-4/demo-script-template.md` (ready for Session 1 data integration)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0D: Cross-Session Dependency Tracker (Visual Dependency Graph)
+**AGENT ID:** S4-H0D
+**START:** Immediately (no dependencies)
+
+**Monitor All Sessions:**
+- **Dependency mapping:** Track which sessions are blocking others
+- **Critical path visualization:** Identify slowest session (bottleneck)
+- **Parallel work opportunities:** Find tasks that can run concurrently
+- **Completion predictions:** Estimate when each session will finish
+
+**Dependency Graph (Mermaid):**
+```mermaid
+graph TD
+    S1[Session 1: Market Research] --> S2[Session 2: Technical Architecture]
+    S1 --> S3[Session 3: UX/Sales]
+    S2 --> S3
+    S1 --> S4[Session 4: Implementation Planning]
+    S2 --> S4
+    S3 --> S4
+    S1 --> S5[Session 5: Guardian Validation]
+    S2 --> S5
+    S3 --> S5
+    S4 --> S5
+
+    style S1 fill:#90EE90
+    style S2 fill:#FFD700
+    style S3 fill:#FFD700
+    style S4 fill:#FFD700
+    style S5 fill:#87CEEB
+```
+
+**Real-Time Status Updates:**
+```yaml
+# intelligence/session-4/dependency-status.md
+
+## Critical Path Analysis (Updated Every 5 Minutes)
+
+SLOWEST SESSION: Session 1 (30 min remaining)
+  - Blocks: Session 2 (Agent 10), Session 3 (Agents 8-10), Session 4 (All agents)
+
+PARALLEL WORK:
+  - Session 2 Phase 1 agents (0A-0D): ✅ RUNNING (assisting Session 1)
+  - Session 5 Phase 1 agents (0A-0C): ✅ RUNNING (deploying standards)
+
+ESTIMATED COMPLETION:
+  - Session 1: 13:30 UTC
+  - Session 2: 14:00 UTC (depends on Session 1)
+  - Session 3: 14:30 UTC (depends on Sessions 1+2)
+  - Session 4: 15:00 UTC (depends on Sessions 1+2+3)
+  - Session 5: 16:30 UTC (depends on all)
+```
+
+**Deliverable:** `intelligence/session-4/dependency-status.md` (updated every 5 minutes with Mermaid graph)
+
+---
+
 
 ## Agent Identity & Check-In Protocol
 
diff --git a/CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md b/CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md
index e6f344a..304dbec 100644
--- a/CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md
+++ b/CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md
@@ -11,7 +11,9 @@
 
 ## Mission Statement
 
-Synthesize all intelligence from Sessions 1-4 into comprehensive dossier, validate claims with medical-grade evidence standards, achieve Guardian Council consensus (>90% approval), and deliver final presentation materials.
+**Active Quality Assurance Partner (Immediate Start):** Deploy evidence quality standards, monitor Sessions 1-4 commits in real-time, provide continuous feedback to prevent rework.
+
+**Final Validation (When Sessions 1-4 Complete):** Synthesize all intelligence into comprehensive dossier, validate claims with medical-grade evidence standards, achieve Guardian Council consensus (>90% approval), and deliver final presentation materials.
 
 ---
 
@@ -66,7 +68,187 @@ Each agent MUST:
 
 ---
 
-## Your Tasks (Spawn 10 Haiku Agents in Parallel)
+## Your Tasks (Spawn 13 Haiku Agents)
+
+**PHASE 1: Active Quality Assurance (START IMMEDIATELY - NO DEPENDENCIES)**
+
+### Agent 0A: Evidence Quality Standards Deployment
+**AGENT ID:** S5-H0A
+**PRIORITY:** CRITICAL - Deploy within first 10 minutes
+**
+**Create:**
+- `EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md` - Master reference for Sessions 1-4
+  - **Citation format templates:**
+    ```json
+    {
+      "citation_id": "if://citation/warranty-savings-8k-33k",
+      "claim": "NaviDocs prevents €8K-€33K warranty losses per yacht",
+      "sources": [
+        {
+          "type": "web",
+          "url": "https://yachtworld.com/research/yacht-ownership-costs-2024",
+          "sha256": "a1b2c3d4...",
+          "accessed": "2025-11-13",
+          "quality": "primary",
+          "credibility": 9
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "file",
+          "path": "intelligence/session-1/market-analysis.md",
+          "line_range": "45-67",
+          "quality": "primary"
+        }
+      ],
+      "status": "verified",
+      "confidence_score": 0.95
+    }
+    ```
+  - **IF.TTT compliance checklist:**
+    - [ ] ≥2 independent sources for high-confidence claims
+    - [ ] Web URLs include SHA-256 hash (tamper detection)
+    - [ ] File references include line numbers
+    - [ ] Citation ID follows if:// URI scheme
+    - [ ] Confidence score justified (0.0-1.0)
+    - [ ] Status tracked: unverified → verified → disputed → revoked
+  - **Evidence quality scoring:**
+    - Primary source (9-10 credibility): Original research, official statistics, codebase analysis
+    - Secondary source (7-8 credibility): Industry reports, competitor websites, expert interviews
+    - Tertiary source (5-6 credibility): Blog posts, forum discussions, anecdotal evidence
+    - Unverified (0-4 credibility): Claims without sources
+  - **Multi-source verification examples:**
+    - Market sizing claim: YachtWorld stats + Boat International report
+    - Technical claim: Codebase file:line + architecture doc
+    - Competitive claim: Competitor website + pricing screenshot
+
+**Commit to coordination branch:**
+```bash
+git add EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md
+git commit -m "Session 5: Evidence quality standards for Sessions 1-4"
+git push origin navidocs-cloud-coordination
+```
+
+**Notify other sessions:**
+- Update `AUTONOMOUS-COORDINATION-STATUS.md`: "✅ Evidence standards deployed - Sessions 1-4 reference EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md"
+
+**Deliverable:** `EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md` (Sessions 1-4 read this immediately)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0B: Real-Time Quality Monitor (CONTINUOUS)
+**AGENT ID:** S5-H0B
+**PRIORITY:** HIGH - Run every 5 minutes for entire session
+**
+**Monitor:**
+- Poll `intelligence/session-1/`, `session-2/`, `session-3/`, `session-4/` for new commits
+- Check git log every 5 minutes:
+  ```bash
+  git fetch origin navidocs-cloud-coordination
+  git log --since="5 minutes ago" --name-status -- intelligence/
+  ```
+
+**Review:**
+- New citations: Are they IF.TTT compliant? (SHA-256 hashes, ≥2 sources, line numbers)
+- Market claims: Do they cite credible sources? (not just "industry experts say...")
+- Technical claims: Do they reference codebase? (file:line required)
+- ROI calculations: Do they show work? (formulas + source data)
+
+**Feedback Loop:**
+- Create `QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md` (updated every 5 minutes):
+  ```markdown
+  # Real-Time Quality Feedback (Updated: 2025-11-13 14:35 UTC)
+
+  ## ✅ Session 1 (Good)
+  - Agent 2 citation: Excellent (2 primary sources, SHA-256 hashes included)
+  - Agent 3 market sizing: Good (YachtWorld + Boat International cited)
+
+  ## ⚠️ Session 2 (Needs Attention)
+  - Agent 3 maintenance log claim: Missing line number reference
+  - Agent 6 accounting module: Only 1 source (need ≥2 for high confidence)
+
+  ## 🔴 Session 3 (Action Required)
+  - Agent 5 ROI calculator: No source citations for €8K-€33K warranty claim
+  - Action: Review Session 1 market analysis, add citation links
+
+  ## ✅ Session 4 (Good)
+  - Sprint plan: All tasks reference Session 2 architecture (file:line included)
+  ```
+
+**Commit feedback every 5 minutes:**
+```bash
+git add QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md
+git commit -m "Session 5: Quality feedback ($(date -Iseconds))"
+git push origin navidocs-cloud-coordination
+```
+
+**Escalate if needed:**
+- >20% of citations lack IF.TTT compliance → ESCALATE to Sonnet coordinator
+- Sessions 1-4 read feedback, fix issues proactively (prevent rework at validation stage)
+
+**Deliverable:** `QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md` (updated every 5 minutes)
+
+---
+
+### Agent 0C: Guardian Briefing Templates (PREP WORK)
+**AGENT ID:** S5-H0C
+**
+**Create templates for final validation (ready when Sessions 1-4 complete):**
+
+1. **Guardian-Specific Briefing Template (20 guardians):**
+   ```markdown
+   # Guardian Briefing: [Guardian Name]
+   **Philosophy:** [Empiricism, Pragmatism, IF.sam Light/Dark, etc.]
+   **Focus Areas:** [What this guardian cares about most]
+
+   ## Executive Summary
+   [Tailored to guardian's philosophy]
+
+   ## Key Evidence
+   [Filtered to guardian's interests]
+   - Empiricism: Market research data, statistical evidence
+   - Pragmatism: ROI calculations, implementation feasibility
+   - IF.sam (Light): Ethical sales, transparency, user benefit
+   - IF.sam (Dark): Competitive advantage, revenue potential, market dominance
+
+   ## Questions for This Guardian
+   [Anticipated concerns based on philosophy]
+
+   ## Voting Criteria
+   - [ ] Evidence quality meets standards
+   - [ ] Claims aligned with guardian's values
+   - [ ] Implementation feasible
+   ```
+
+2. **Consensus Prediction Formula:**
+   ```javascript
+   function predictConsensus(dossier) {
+     let approvalScore = 0;
+     // Evidence quality (40% weight)
+     approvalScore += dossier.verifiedCitations / dossier.totalCitations * 0.4;
+     // Multi-source verification (30% weight)
+     approvalScore += dossier.multiSourceClaims / dossier.totalClaims * 0.3;
+     // Implementation feasibility (20% weight)
+     approvalScore += dossier.feasibilityScore * 0.2;
+     // Guardian alignment (10% weight)
+     approvalScore += dossier.philosophyAlignment * 0.1;
+
+     return approvalScore * 100; // Return as percentage
+   }
+   ```
+
+3. **Voting Criteria Checklist:**
+   - [ ] All high-confidence claims have ≥2 sources
+   - [ ] Technical claims reference codebase (file:line)
+   - [ ] Market sizing backed by credible sources
+   - [ ] ROI calculations show work (formulas + data)
+   - [ ] Implementation timeline realistic (based on codebase complexity)
+   - [ ] Acceptance criteria testable
+   - [ ] No unverified claims in executive summary
+
+**Deliverable:** `GUARDIAN_BRIEFING_TEMPLATES/` directory with 20 templates + consensus formula
+
+---
+
+**PHASE 2: Evidence Extraction & Validation (WAIT FOR SESSIONS 1-4)**
 
 ### Agent 1: Session 1 Evidence Extraction
 **AGENT ID:** S5-H01
diff --git a/EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md b/EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5f3830a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/EVIDENCE_QUALITY_STANDARDS.md
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
+# Evidence Quality Standards for NaviDocs Intelligence Sessions
+**For:** Sessions 1, 2, 3, 4 (reference this document while working)
+**Created by:** Session 5 Agent 0A
+**Last Updated:** 2025-11-13
+**Status:** ACTIVE - All sessions must follow these standards
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Purpose
+
+Ensure all market research, technical claims, and business intelligence meet medical-grade evidence standards (IF.TTT: Traceable, Transparent, Trustworthy).
+
+**Why This Matters:**
+- Guardian Council requires >90% consensus (18/20 votes)
+- 100% consensus requires empirical validation + testable predictions
+- Poor evidence quality = rework at validation stage (expensive)
+- High-quality citations = faster Guardian approval = faster launch
+
+---
+
+## 📋 Citation Format (IF.TTT Compliant)
+
+### **Template:**
+
+```json
+{
+  "citation_id": "if://citation/[unique-identifier]",
+  "claim": "[The specific claim being made]",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://example.com/research",
+      "sha256": "a1b2c3d4e5f6...",
+      "accessed": "2025-11-13",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 9,
+      "excerpt": "[Relevant quote from source]"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "file",
+      "path": "intelligence/session-1/market-analysis.md",
+      "line_range": "45-67",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 9
+    }
+  ],
+  "status": "verified",
+  "confidence_score": 0.95,
+  "verified_by": "S1-H02",
+  "verification_date": "2025-11-13"
+}
+```
+
+### **Required Fields:**
+
+| Field | Required | Description |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `citation_id` | ✅ YES | Unique ID following `if://citation/[identifier]` format |
+| `claim` | ✅ YES | Exact claim being cited (1-2 sentences) |
+| `sources` | ✅ YES | Array of ≥2 sources for high-confidence claims |
+| `status` | ✅ YES | `unverified`, `verified`, `disputed`, or `revoked` |
+| `confidence_score` | ✅ YES | 0.0-1.0 (justify based on source quality) |
+| `verified_by` | ✅ YES | Agent ID (e.g., `S1-H02`) |
+| `verification_date` | ✅ YES | ISO 8601 format |
+
+---
+
+## 🔍 Evidence Quality Scoring
+
+### **Primary Sources (9-10 credibility):**
+- Official government statistics (e.g., DGCCRF yacht registration data)
+- Original research studies (peer-reviewed journals)
+- Industry association reports (ECPY, Nautical Statistics)
+- Codebase analysis (file:line references in NaviDocs repo)
+- Direct interviews with verified experts (transcripts available)
+
+**Examples:**
+- ✅ "YachtWorld 2024 Ownership Cost Report (PDF, 47 pages)"
+- ✅ "NaviDocs codebase: `server/db/schema.sql:45-67`"
+- ✅ "Boat International Annual Market Report 2024"
+
+### **Secondary Sources (7-8 credibility):**
+- Industry news articles (Boat International, YachtWorld)
+- Competitor websites (pricing pages, feature lists)
+- Trade show presentations (documented with photos/slides)
+- Expert blog posts (verified industry professionals)
+- LinkedIn profiles (for market sizing claims)
+
+**Examples:**
+- ✅ "Northrop & Johnson website pricing (screenshot + SHA-256 hash)"
+- ✅ "Camper & Nicholsons feature comparison table"
+
+### **Tertiary Sources (5-6 credibility):**
+- Forum discussions (YachtForums, The Hull Truth)
+- Reddit threads (r/sailing, r/yachts)
+- Anecdotal evidence ("broker told me...")
+- Marketing materials (press releases, brochures)
+
+**Examples:**
+- ⚠️ "YachtForums thread: 'What do yacht owners really need?'"
+- ⚠️ Use only if ≥2 primary sources unavailable
+
+### **Unverified (0-4 credibility):**
+- Claims without sources ("industry experts estimate...")
+- Single-source claims (need ≥2 sources)
+- Broken links (URL returns 404)
+- Paywalled content (can't verify)
+
+**Examples:**
+- ❌ "Experts say warranty claims cost €10K-€50K" (who? which experts?)
+- ❌ Single YachtWorld article without corroboration
+
+---
+
+## ✅ IF.TTT Compliance Checklist
+
+**Before committing any citation, verify:**
+
+- [ ] **≥2 independent sources** for high-confidence claims (confidence ≥0.9)
+- [ ] **Web URLs include SHA-256 hash** (tamper detection via `sha256sum <file>`)
+- [ ] **File references include line numbers** (`intelligence/session-1/market-analysis.md:45-67`)
+- [ ] **Citation ID follows if:// URI scheme** (`if://citation/warranty-savings-8k-33k`)
+- [ ] **Confidence score justified** (0.9+ requires ≥2 primary sources)
+- [ ] **Status tracked** (unverified → verified → disputed → revoked)
+- [ ] **Agent ID recorded** (who verified this claim?)
+- [ ] **Verification date recorded** (when was this verified?)
+
+---
+
+## 📊 Multi-Source Verification Examples
+
+### **Example 1: Market Sizing Claim**
+
+**Claim:** "Mediterranean yacht brokerage market: 150-200 active brokers"
+
+**Good Citation (≥2 sources):**
+```json
+{
+  "citation_id": "if://citation/mediterranean-broker-count",
+  "claim": "Mediterranean yacht brokerage market: 150-200 active brokers",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://yachtworld.com/research/mediterranean-brokers-2024",
+      "sha256": "a1b2c3d4...",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 9,
+      "excerpt": "Our database shows 178 active yacht brokers in Mediterranean region"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://boatinternational.com/market-analysis/2024",
+      "sha256": "e5f6g7h8...",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 9,
+      "excerpt": "Estimated 150-200 professional yacht brokers operating in Med"
+    }
+  ],
+  "status": "verified",
+  "confidence_score": 0.95
+}
+```
+
+### **Example 2: Technical Claim**
+
+**Claim:** "NaviDocs uses Express.js + SQLite for backend"
+
+**Good Citation (codebase reference):**
+```json
+{
+  "citation_id": "if://citation/navidocs-tech-stack",
+  "claim": "NaviDocs uses Express.js + SQLite for backend",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "file",
+      "path": "server/index.js",
+      "line_range": "1-15",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 10,
+      "excerpt": "const express = require('express'); const sqlite3 = require('sqlite3');"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "file",
+      "path": "package.json",
+      "line_range": "12-18",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 10,
+      "excerpt": "dependencies: { express: ^4.18.0, sqlite3: ^5.1.0 }"
+    }
+  ],
+  "status": "verified",
+  "confidence_score": 1.0
+}
+```
+
+### **Example 3: Competitive Claim**
+
+**Claim:** "Competitor X charges €25/month for yacht management software"
+
+**Good Citation (competitor website + screenshot):**
+```json
+{
+  "citation_id": "if://citation/competitor-x-pricing",
+  "claim": "Competitor X charges €25/month for yacht management software",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://competitorx.com/pricing",
+      "sha256": "b2c3d4e5...",
+      "accessed": "2025-11-13",
+      "quality": "primary",
+      "credibility": 9,
+      "screenshot": "intelligence/session-1/screenshots/competitor-x-pricing.png"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "file",
+      "path": "intelligence/session-1/competitive-analysis.md",
+      "line_range": "120-125",
+      "quality": "secondary",
+      "credibility": 8,
+      "excerpt": "Competitor X pricing confirmed via website analysis"
+    }
+  ],
+  "status": "verified",
+  "confidence_score": 0.90
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 Common Mistakes to Avoid
+
+### **❌ Bad: Single Source**
+```json
+{
+  "claim": "Warranty claims cost €8K-€33K per yacht",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://yachtworld.com/article",
+      "quality": "primary"
+    }
+  ],
+  "confidence_score": 0.95  // ❌ Can't claim 0.95 with single source!
+}
+```
+
+### **✅ Good: Multiple Sources**
+```json
+{
+  "claim": "Warranty claims cost €8K-€33K per yacht",
+  "sources": [
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://yachtworld.com/warranty-costs-2024",
+      "sha256": "a1b2...",
+      "credibility": 9
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "web",
+      "url": "https://boatinternational.com/ownership-costs",
+      "sha256": "c3d4...",
+      "credibility": 9
+    }
+  ],
+  "confidence_score": 0.95  // ✅ Justified with ≥2 primary sources
+}
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔄 Real-Time Quality Feedback Loop
+
+**Sessions 1-4: Check `QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md` every 5 minutes**
+
+Session 5 Agent 0B monitors your commits and provides real-time feedback:
+
+```markdown
+## ⚠️ Session 2 (Needs Attention)
+- Agent 3 maintenance log claim: Missing line number reference
+  - Claim: "NaviDocs tracks maintenance via BullMQ workers"
+  - Fix: Add file:line reference (e.g., `server/workers/maintenance.js:45-67`)
+
+## 🔴 Session 1 (Action Required)
+- Agent 5 ROI calculator: No source citations for €8K-€33K warranty claim
+  - Fix: Add ≥2 sources (YachtWorld + Boat International reports)
+```
+
+**Action:** Read feedback → Fix issues → Commit → Continue working
+
+---
+
+## 📈 Confidence Score Guidelines
+
+| Score | Sources Required | Quality Required | Use Case |
+|-------|------------------|------------------|----------|
+| 0.95-1.0 | ≥2 primary | Both 9-10 credibility | Market sizing, ROI calculations |
+| 0.85-0.94 | ≥2 mixed | 1 primary + 1 secondary | Competitive analysis, feature claims |
+| 0.70-0.84 | ≥1 primary | 7-10 credibility | Technical claims (if codebase verified) |
+| 0.50-0.69 | ≥1 secondary | 5-8 credibility | Anecdotal evidence, forum discussions |
+| <0.50 | Any | <5 credibility | Unverified claims (flag for review) |
+
+---
+
+## 🎯 Guardian Council Expectations
+
+### **What Gets >90% Approval:**
+- All high-confidence claims (≥0.9) have ≥2 primary sources
+- Technical claims reference codebase with file:line
+- Market sizing backed by official statistics or industry reports
+- ROI calculations show work (formulas + source data visible)
+- Implementation timeline realistic (validated against codebase complexity)
+
+### **What Gets <80% Approval (ESCALATED):**
+- >20% of claims lack proper citations
+- Single-source claims for critical market data
+- Broken URLs or inaccessible sources
+- Confidence scores not justified by source quality
+- Unverified claims in executive summary
+
+---
+
+## 📞 Need Help?
+
+**Questions about citation format?**
+- Check `schemas/citation/v1.0.schema.json` (JSON schema reference)
+- Review Session 5 examples in `CLOUD_SESSION_5_SYNTHESIS_VALIDATION.md`
+
+**Quality feedback unclear?**
+- Check `QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md` (updated every 5 minutes by Agent 0B)
+- ESCALATE to Sonnet coordinator if blocked
+
+**Citation tool available:**
+```bash
+# Validate citation JSON against schema
+python tools/citation_validate.py citations/session-1-citations.json
+```
+
+---
+
+**Remember: High-quality evidence now = Faster Guardian approval later = Faster launch!**
+
+🚀 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)