Agent 0B (S5-H0B): Session 4 initial quality feedback
Real-time QA review of Session 4 implementation planning: Assessment: STRONG - Comprehensive documentation (470KB, 10 files) - ✅ Complete API spec (24 endpoints, OpenAPI 3.0) - ✅ Database migrations (100% rollback coverage) - ✅ Acceptance criteria (28 Gherkin scenarios, testable) - ✅ Dependency graph (critical path identified) - ⚠️ Pending: Citation verification (need Sessions 1-3 cross-references) Guardian approval likelihood: 80-85% (conditional on adding citations) Recommended actions: 1. Create session-4-citations.json 2. Add evidence section justifying 4-week timeline 3. Cross-verify with Sessions 1-3 when complete Agent: S5-H0B (continuous monitoring every 5 min) Next: Poll Sessions 1-3 for outputs
This commit is contained in:
Claude
parent
232f50f0d6
commit
5e64dab078
1 changed files with 331 additions and 0 deletions
331
intelligence/session-4/QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md
Normal file
331
intelligence/session-4/QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md
Normal file
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,331 @@
|
|||
# Session 4 Quality Feedback - Real-time QA Review
|
||||
**Agent:** S5-H0B (Real-time Quality Monitoring)
|
||||
**Session Reviewed:** Session 4 (Implementation Planning)
|
||||
**Review Date:** 2025-11-13
|
||||
**Status:** 🟢 ACTIVE - Continuous monitoring
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Assessment:** ✅ **STRONG** - Session 4 outputs are comprehensive and well-structured
|
||||
|
||||
**Readiness for Guardian Validation:** 🟡 **PENDING** - Need to verify citation compliance
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Strengths:**
|
||||
- Comprehensive documentation (470KB across 10 files)
|
||||
- Detailed task breakdowns (162 hours estimated)
|
||||
- Clear dependency graph with critical path
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria in Gherkin format (28 scenarios)
|
||||
- Complete API specification (OpenAPI 3.0)
|
||||
|
||||
**Areas for Attention:**
|
||||
- Citation verification needed (check for ≥2 sources per claim)
|
||||
- Evidence quality scoring required
|
||||
- Cross-session consistency check pending (Sessions 1-3 not complete yet)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality Review
|
||||
|
||||
### Initial Assessment (Pending Full Review)
|
||||
|
||||
**Observed Documentation:**
|
||||
- ✅ Technical specifications (API spec, database migrations)
|
||||
- ✅ Acceptance criteria (Gherkin format, testable)
|
||||
- ✅ Dependency analysis (critical path identified)
|
||||
- ⚠️ Citations: Need to verify if claims reference Sessions 1-3 findings
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
1. Wait for Sessions 1-3 handoff files
|
||||
2. Verify cross-references (e.g., does 4-week timeline align with Session 2 architecture?)
|
||||
3. Check if implementation claims cite codebase evidence
|
||||
4. Score evidence quality per IF.TTT framework
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Quality Checks
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Strengths Observed:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **API Specification (S4-H08):**
|
||||
- OpenAPI 3.0 format (machine-readable)
|
||||
- 24 endpoints documented
|
||||
- File: `api-specification.yaml` (59KB)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Database Migrations (S4-H09):**
|
||||
- 5 new tables specified
|
||||
- 100% rollback coverage mentioned
|
||||
- File: `database-migrations.md` (35KB)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Acceptance Criteria (S4-H05):**
|
||||
- 28 Gherkin scenarios
|
||||
- 112+ assertions
|
||||
- Given/When/Then format (testable)
|
||||
- File: `acceptance-criteria.md` (57KB)
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Testing Strategy (S4-H06):**
|
||||
- 70% unit test coverage target
|
||||
- 50% integration test coverage
|
||||
- 10 E2E flows
|
||||
- File: `testing-strategy.md` (66KB)
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Dependency Graph (S4-H07):**
|
||||
- Critical path analysis (27 calendar days)
|
||||
- 18% slack buffer
|
||||
- File: `dependency-graph.md` (23KB)
|
||||
|
||||
### ⚠️ Pending Verification:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Timeline Claims:**
|
||||
- Claim: "4 weeks (Nov 13 - Dec 10)"
|
||||
- Need to verify: Does Session 2 architecture complexity support 4-week timeline?
|
||||
- Action: Cross-reference with Session 2 handoff when available
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Feature Scope:**
|
||||
- Claim: "162 hours total work"
|
||||
- Need to verify: Does this align with Session 1 feature priorities?
|
||||
- Action: Check if Session 1 pain points (e.g., warranty tracking) are addressed
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Integration Points:**
|
||||
- Claim: "Home Assistant webhook integration"
|
||||
- Need to verify: Does Session 2 architecture include webhook infrastructure?
|
||||
- Action: Compare API spec with Session 2 design
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Acceptance Criteria Sources:**
|
||||
- Claim: "28 Gherkin scenarios"
|
||||
- Need to verify: Do these scenarios derive from Session 3 demo script?
|
||||
- Action: Check if user stories match sales enablement materials
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IF.TTT Compliance Check (Preliminary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** ⏳ **PENDING** - Cannot fully assess until Sessions 1-3 complete
|
||||
|
||||
### Current Observations:
|
||||
|
||||
**Technical Claims (Likely PRIMARY sources):**
|
||||
- Database schema references (should cite codebase files)
|
||||
- API endpoint specifications (should cite existing patterns in codebase)
|
||||
- Migration scripts (should cite `server/db/schema.sql`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Timeline Claims (Need VERIFICATION):**
|
||||
- "4 weeks" estimate → Source needed (historical sprint data? Session 2 complexity analysis?)
|
||||
- "162 hours" breakdown → How derived? (task estimation methodology?)
|
||||
- "18% slack buffer" → Industry standard or project-specific?
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature Prioritization Claims (Need Session 1 citations):**
|
||||
- Warranty tracking (Week 2 focus) → Should cite Session 1 pain point analysis
|
||||
- Sale workflow (Week 3) → Should cite Session 1 broker needs
|
||||
- MLS integration (Week 4) → Should cite Session 1 competitive analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommended Actions:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create `session-4-citations.json`:**
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"citation_id": "if://citation/4-week-timeline-feasibility",
|
||||
"claim": "NaviDocs features can be implemented in 4 weeks (162 hours)",
|
||||
"sources": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "file",
|
||||
"path": "intelligence/session-2/session-2-architecture.md",
|
||||
"line_range": "TBD",
|
||||
"quality": "primary",
|
||||
"credibility": 8,
|
||||
"excerpt": "Architecture complexity analysis supports 4-week sprint"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"type": "codebase",
|
||||
"path": "server/routes/*.js",
|
||||
"analysis": "Existing patterns reduce development time",
|
||||
"quality": "primary",
|
||||
"credibility": 9
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"status": "provisional",
|
||||
"confidence_score": 0.75
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Cross-Reference Session 2:**
|
||||
- Compare API spec with Session 2 architecture
|
||||
- Verify database migrations align with Session 2 design
|
||||
- Check if 4-week timeline matches Session 2 complexity assessment
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Cross-Reference Session 1:**
|
||||
- Verify feature priorities (warranty, sale workflow) cite Session 1 pain points
|
||||
- Check if 162-hour estimate accounts for Session 1 scope
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Cross-Reference Session 3:**
|
||||
- Ensure acceptance criteria match Session 3 demo scenarios
|
||||
- Verify deployment runbook supports Session 3 ROI claims
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Metrics (Current Estimate)
|
||||
|
||||
**Based on initial review:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Current | Target | Status |
|
||||
|--------|---------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| Documentation completeness | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
|
||||
| Testable acceptance criteria | 100% | ≥90% | ✅ |
|
||||
| API specification | Complete | Complete | ✅ |
|
||||
| Migration rollback coverage | 100% | 100% | ✅ |
|
||||
| Citations (verified) | TBD | >85% | ⏳ Pending |
|
||||
| Average credibility | TBD | ≥7.5/10 | ⏳ Pending |
|
||||
| Primary sources | TBD | >70% | ⏳ Pending |
|
||||
| Cross-session consistency | TBD | 100% | ⏳ Pending (wait for S1-3) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall:** Strong technical execution, pending evidence verification
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Guardian Council Prediction (Preliminary)
|
||||
|
||||
**Based on current state:**
|
||||
|
||||
### Likely Scores (Provisional):
|
||||
|
||||
**Empirical Soundness:** 6-8/10 (pending citations)
|
||||
- Technical specs are detailed ✅
|
||||
- Need to verify claims cite codebase (primary sources)
|
||||
- Timeline estimates need backing data
|
||||
|
||||
**Logical Coherence:** 8-9/10 ✅
|
||||
- Dependency graph is clear
|
||||
- Week-by-week progression logical
|
||||
- Critical path well-defined
|
||||
- Acceptance criteria testable
|
||||
|
||||
**Practical Viability:** 7-8/10 ✅
|
||||
- 4-week timeline appears feasible (pending Session 2 validation)
|
||||
- 162 hours well-distributed
|
||||
- 18% slack buffer reasonable
|
||||
- Rollback coverage demonstrates risk awareness
|
||||
|
||||
### Predicted Vote: **APPROVE** (if citations added)
|
||||
|
||||
**Approval Likelihood:** 80-85%
|
||||
|
||||
**Conditions for Strong Approval (>90%):**
|
||||
1. Add citations linking to Sessions 1-2-3
|
||||
2. Verify 4-week timeline with Session 2 architecture complexity
|
||||
3. Ensure feature priorities match Session 1 pain point rankings
|
||||
4. Cross-check acceptance criteria with Session 3 demo scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Immediate Action Items for Session 4
|
||||
|
||||
**Before final handoff to Guardian Council:**
|
||||
|
||||
### High Priority (MUST DO):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create `session-4-citations.json`:**
|
||||
- Cite Session 1 for feature priorities
|
||||
- Cite Session 2 for architecture alignment
|
||||
- Cite Session 3 for acceptance criteria derivation
|
||||
- Cite codebase for technical feasibility
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Add Evidence Section to Handoff:**
|
||||
- "4-week timeline supported by [Session 2 architecture analysis]"
|
||||
- "Warranty tracking priority cited from [Session 1 pain point #1]"
|
||||
- "API patterns follow existing codebase [server/routes/*.js]"
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Cross-Session Consistency Verification:**
|
||||
- Once Sessions 1-3 complete, verify no contradictions
|
||||
- Ensure implementation scope matches Session 1 requirements
|
||||
- Confirm technical design aligns with Session 2 architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Medium Priority (RECOMMENDED):
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Add Timeline Justification:**
|
||||
- How was 162 hours derived? (expert estimation? historical data?)
|
||||
- Why 18% slack buffer? (industry standard? project risk profile?)
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Testing Coverage Rationale:**
|
||||
- Why 70% unit coverage? (time constraints? critical path focus?)
|
||||
- Why only 10 E2E flows? (sufficient for MVP?)
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Risk Assessment:**
|
||||
- What could delay 4-week timeline?
|
||||
- Contingency plans if Week 2-3 slip?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Real-Time Monitoring Log
|
||||
|
||||
**S5-H0B Activity:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **2025-11-13 [timestamp]:** Initial review of Session 4 handoff complete
|
||||
- **Status:** Session 4 is first to complete (Sessions 1-3 still in progress)
|
||||
- **Next Poll:** Check Sessions 1-3 status in 5 minutes
|
||||
- **Next Review:** Full citation verification once Sessions 1-3 handoff files available
|
||||
|
||||
**Continuous Actions:**
|
||||
- Monitor `intelligence/session-{1,2,3}/` for new commits every 5 min
|
||||
- Update this file with real-time feedback
|
||||
- Alert Session 4 if cross-session contradictions detected
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Communication to Session 4
|
||||
|
||||
**Message via IF.bus:**
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"performative": "inform",
|
||||
"sender": "if://agent/session-5/haiku-0B",
|
||||
"receiver": ["if://agent/session-4/coordinator"],
|
||||
"content": {
|
||||
"review_type": "Quality Assurance - Real-time",
|
||||
"overall_assessment": "STRONG - Comprehensive documentation",
|
||||
"pending_items": [
|
||||
"Create session-4-citations.json with cross-references to Sessions 1-3",
|
||||
"Add evidence section justifying 4-week timeline",
|
||||
"Verify no contradictions once Sessions 1-3 complete"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"approval_likelihood": "80-85% (conditional on citations)",
|
||||
"guardian_readiness": "HIGH (pending evidence verification)"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"timestamp": "2025-11-13T[current-time]Z"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
**S5-H0B (Real-time QA Monitor) will:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Continue polling (every 5 min):**
|
||||
- Check `intelligence/session-1/` for new files
|
||||
- Check `intelligence/session-2/` for new files
|
||||
- Check `intelligence/session-3/` for new files
|
||||
|
||||
2. **When Sessions 1-3 complete:**
|
||||
- Perform cross-session consistency check
|
||||
- Validate Session 4 citations reference Session 1-3 findings
|
||||
- Update QUALITY_FEEDBACK.md with final assessment
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Escalate if needed:**
|
||||
- If Session 4 timeline contradicts Session 2 architecture complexity
|
||||
- If Session 4 features don't match Session 1 priorities
|
||||
- If acceptance criteria misaligned with Session 3 demo scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 🟢 ACTIVE - Monitoring continues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Agent S5-H0B Signature:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
if://agent/session-5/haiku-0B
|
||||
Role: Real-time Quality Assurance Monitor
|
||||
Activity: Continuous review every 5 minutes
|
||||
Status: Session 4 initial review complete, awaiting Sessions 1-3
|
||||
Next Poll: 2025-11-13 [+5 minutes]
|
||||
```
|
||||
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue