Same mechanism, different third‑party pressure.
B2B SaaS (SOC 2 / ISO)
Third party
Auditors + enterprise procurement
They want
Evidence that controls existed at the right time, in the right scope, with receipts.
IF.TTT helps by
Publishing no‑login receipts and offline bundles for disputes and audits.
B2B SaaS →
Fintech / Regulated Finance
Third party
Regulators + model risk + internal audit
They want
Non‑repudiation, dispute workflows, and “show your work” provenance.
IF.TTT helps by
Binding outputs to sources and creating a defensible, replayable receipt trail.
Finance →
Healthcare
Third party
Compliance + vendors + incident reviewers
They want
Clear boundaries: what’s verified, what’s inferred, and what must be reviewed by humans.
IF.TTT helps by
Making evidence legible to outsiders while preserving strict, machine‑verifiable receipts.
Healthcare →
Gov / Defense Contractors
Third party
Assessors + customers + supply‑chain review
They want
Offline‑verifiable bundles and unambiguous chain‑of‑custody.
IF.TTT helps by
Providing triage bundles that can be verified without trusted network access.
Government →
AI Product Companies
Third party
Enterprise buyers + incident responders
They want
Provable provenance for outputs (“why did it say that?”) without internal access.
IF.TTT helps by
Making trace receipts shareable, replayable, and dispute‑friendly.
AI products →
SecOps / SOC
Third party
Executives + auditors after an incident
They want
To verify AI summaries against raw evidence and keep chain‑of‑custody intact.
IF.TTT helps by
Binding “what the system said” to “what the system saw” via receipts and bundles.
SecOps →
Industrial / Supply Chain
Third party
Customers + auditors + insurers
They want
Proof of change control and traceability that survives contractor handoffs.
IF.TTT helps by
Standardizing receipts so handoffs remain verifiable across organizational boundaries.
Supply chain →