Update dossier editions (v1.2 evidence index)

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
 
 ---
 
-# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1
+# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2
 
 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance)  
 **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master  
 **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC)  
-**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1`  
+**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2`  
 **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io  
 **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker)  
 **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io)
@@ -23,6 +23,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man
 
 ---
 
+<a id="section-0-constitutional-for-whom"></a>
+
+## 0. Constitutional For Whom?
+
+Every governance system has a constitution.
+
+Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights.
+
+This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify.
+
+### The Two Models
+
+**Constitutional for the Architects**
+- Experts design governance rules
+- Experts validate compliance
+- Experts audit decisions
+- Citizens trust expert certification
+- Governance is legible to specialists
+
+**Constitutional for the Subjects**
+- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint
+- Audit trails explain themselves
+- Decisions are readable without expert translation
+- Governance is legible to the governed
+
+**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.**
+
+**InfraFabric implements Subjects.**
+
+### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept
+
+If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment.
+
+Mental health AI is the stress test:
+- high stakes (crisis situations)
+- vulnerable users
+- no expert present
+- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle
+
+This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.”
+
+### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required)
+
+Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages.
+
+- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html
+- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md
+- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py
+
+The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars.
+
+**Example traces (public bundles):**
+- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run)
+- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT)
+- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace)
+- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace)
+- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages)
+
+The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis.
+
+### The Question
+
+We are not asking you to believe something new.
+
+We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations.
+
+If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance.
+
+If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly.
+
+---
+
 <a id="bridge-submission-pack"></a>
 
 ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation)
@@ -41,7 +113,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard
 
 | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) |
 |---|---|---|
-| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
+| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**<br/>- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)<br/>- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
 | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*<br/>- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates<br/>- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths<br/>- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. |
 | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*<br/>- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)<br/>- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. |
 

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md.sha256

@@ -1 +1 @@
-7b3f05446674223c0bfdd35093c44c39ac87c6c5144994706701ad543d0598a5  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md
+6e644c294fd96131186369e5b52432f3aec91d9682e6924462c7b50a476ec481  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md

@@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
 
 ---
 
-# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1
+# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2
 
 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance)  
 **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master  
 **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC)  
-**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1`  
+**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2`  
 **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io  
 **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker)  
 **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io)
@@ -23,6 +23,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man
 
 ---
 
+<a id="section-0-constitutional-for-whom"></a>
+
+## 0. Constitutional For Whom?
+
+Every governance system has a constitution.
+
+Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights.
+
+This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify.
+
+### The Two Models
+
+**Constitutional for the Architects**
+- Experts design governance rules
+- Experts validate compliance
+- Experts audit decisions
+- Citizens trust expert certification
+- Governance is legible to specialists
+
+**Constitutional for the Subjects**
+- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint
+- Audit trails explain themselves
+- Decisions are readable without expert translation
+- Governance is legible to the governed
+
+**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.**
+
+**InfraFabric implements Subjects.**
+
+### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept
+
+If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment.
+
+Mental health AI is the stress test:
+- high stakes (crisis situations)
+- vulnerable users
+- no expert present
+- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle
+
+This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.”
+
+### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required)
+
+Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages.
+
+- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html
+- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md
+- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py
+
+The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars.
+
+**Example traces (public bundles):**
+- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run)
+- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT)
+- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace)
+- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace)
+- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages)
+
+The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis.
+
+### The Question
+
+We are not asking you to believe something new.
+
+We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations.
+
+If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance.
+
+If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly.
+
+---
+
 <a id="bridge-submission-pack"></a>
 
 ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation)
@@ -41,7 +113,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard
 
 | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) |
 |---|---|---|
-| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
+| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**<br/>- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)<br/>- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
 | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*<br/>- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates<br/>- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths<br/>- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. |
 | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*<br/>- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)<br/>- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. |
 

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md.sha256

@@ -1 +1 @@
-9e1349befc86455b40675af4dcbbcace77a1dcbfe5e1e28b60c4515948762793  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md
+865a40a0d29c21aa7941f73a73ffafaae1d52b46e10793296a78d1ffeb39c7ec  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_UNCUT.md

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
-# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1
+# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2
 
 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance)  
 **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master  
 **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC)  
-**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1`  
+**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2`  
 **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io  
 **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker)  
 **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io)
@@ -13,6 +13,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man
 
 ---
 
+<a id="section-0-constitutional-for-whom"></a>
+
+## 0. Constitutional For Whom?
+
+Every governance system has a constitution.
+
+Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights.
+
+This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify.
+
+### The Two Models
+
+**Constitutional for the Architects**
+- Experts design governance rules
+- Experts validate compliance
+- Experts audit decisions
+- Citizens trust expert certification
+- Governance is legible to specialists
+
+**Constitutional for the Subjects**
+- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint
+- Audit trails explain themselves
+- Decisions are readable without expert translation
+- Governance is legible to the governed
+
+**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.**
+
+**InfraFabric implements Subjects.**
+
+### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept
+
+If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment.
+
+Mental health AI is the stress test:
+- high stakes (crisis situations)
+- vulnerable users
+- no expert present
+- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle
+
+This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.”
+
+### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required)
+
+Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages.
+
+- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html
+- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md
+- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py
+
+The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars.
+
+**Example traces (public bundles):**
+- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run)
+- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT)
+- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace)
+- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace)
+- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages)
+
+The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis.
+
+### The Question
+
+We are not asking you to believe something new.
+
+We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations.
+
+If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance.
+
+If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly.
+
+---
+
 <a id="bridge-submission-pack"></a>
 
 ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation)
@@ -31,7 +103,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard
 
 | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) |
 |---|---|---|
-| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
+| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**<br/>- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)<br/>- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)<br/>- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)<br/>- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)<br/>- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
 | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*<br/>- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates<br/>- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths<br/>- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. |
 | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*<br/>- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)<br/>- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. |
 

DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_UNCUT.md.sha256

@@ -1 +1 @@
-125415b19e361aad7c5cc6940d2af4d81899d4a3e3deefca3333048020a85d93  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_UNCUT.md
+c9ee2b868b83c4b4bac4d9dbca45058155d511112d072977e67d81fb81452b68  DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_UNCUT.md