# IF.TTT — Healthcare
IF.TTT for healthcare: clear boundaries on what is verified vs inferred, and portable evidence for audits and incident review.

Healthcare reality

# Clarity beats confidence.

Healthcare environments punish ambiguity. IF.TTT makes “what we can prove” explicit, and forces everything else to be labeled as interpretation or review-required.

### Third‑party pressure

- Compliance wants evidence that is bounded and reviewable.
- Incident reviewers want provenance for outputs and decisions.
- Vendors and partners want proof without access to your internal tooling.

### What IF.TTT provides

Verified
Integrity binding (hashes), receipts, optional signatures.
Not verified
Clinical intent, interpretation, or correctness of conclusions.
Outcome
Evidence becomes legible to outsiders without pretending it is “the decision.”
BLACK/WHITE
BOUNDARIES

1. 1
   Hash artifacts
   Source and output bytes get stable hashes.
2. 2
   Publish receipts
   Trace page shows what can be verified.
3. 3
   Export bundles (optional)
   For constrained review environments.

Sectors Public Sector Enterprise Research Professional · Industries Healthcare Financial Legal
Developers | API