# IF.TTT — SecOps
IF.TTT for SecOps and SOC: bind AI summaries to evidence; preserve chain-of-custody for investigations and audits.

SecOps reality

# Bind “what the system said” to “what the system saw.”

AI summaries can help, but only if they remain verifiable against raw telemetry. IF.TTT makes the custody chain explicit: source bytes, output bytes, and a receipt that can be validated by third parties.

### Third‑party pressure

- Executives demand a narrative; auditors demand evidence.
- Incident response needs reproducible artifacts, not recollections.
- External assessors need proof without your SIEM credentials.

### What IF.TTT provides

Trace receipt
Integrity binding: `source_sha256` ↔ `output_sha256`.
Offline proof
Bundles that can be verified after the fact, offline.
Clarity
What’s verified is stated; what’s interpretation is labeled as such.
EVIDENCE
REPLAYABLE
Example trace receipt https://infrafabric.io/static/trace/6qRgcR01kw_qNo63Dbs_ob9n

## Operational trap to avoid

Do not treat “AI summary” as evidence.

### Bad

“The AI said this was resolved.”

### Good

“Here is the output, here is the evidence artifact, here is the receipt binding them.”

Sectors Public Sector Enterprise Research Professional · Industries Healthcare Financial Legal
Developers | API