diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md index baace04..e8b076d 100644 --- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md +++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md @@ -172,8 +172,10 @@ Full paper: [Annex — IF.PHIL | Auditable Philanthropy](#annex-ifphil-auditable ### How It Interlocks (Mermaid: System Spine) ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - VISION[IF.vision
coordination without control] --> FOUNDATIONS[IF.foundations
ground/search/persona] + VISION"[IF.vision
coordination without control]" --> FOUNDATIONS[IF.foundations
ground/search/persona] FOUNDATIONS --> ASSURE[Assurance
armour • witness • yologuard] ASSURE --> TRANSPORT[Transport
packet • swarm.s2 • story] TRANSPORT --> BIAS[Preflight
IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Matrix] @@ -186,12 +188,15 @@ graph TD DELIVERY --> DOMAIN[Domain Proofs
GLP1 • emosocial • Juakali] DOMAIN --> FEEDBACK[Feedback into Vision/Foundations] FEEDBACK --> FOUNDATIONS + ``` ### Governance, Assurance, Compliance Loop ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - INQUIRY[IF.5W | Structured Inquiry inquiry
structured deliberation] --> BIAS[IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Preflight
sizes councils (5–30)] + INQUIRY"[IF.5W | Structured Inquiry inquiry
structured deliberation]" --> BIAS[IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Preflight
sizes councils (5–30)] BIAS --> CORE4[IF.GUARD(4) | Core 4 triage
convening authority] CORE4 --> GUARD[IF.GUARD | Council deliberation
panel 5 ↔ extended 30] GUARD --> STORY[IF.STORY | Narrative Logging logs
narrative + state] @@ -202,6 +207,7 @@ graph LR YG --> PACKET[IF.PACKET | Message Transport + swarm.s2
delivery with VocalDNA] PACKET --> EMOTION[IF.emotion
product exemplar] EMOTION --> INQUIRY + ``` ### Delivery & Safety Highlights (with citations) @@ -224,8 +230,10 @@ Doc ID: `if://doc/IF_LINKMAP/v1.0` This is the connective tissue for the corpus: each paper points to the next layer so reviewers can move from concept → compliance → transport → product without hunting. Emo-social tracing is live (retrieval + generation logged to `trace_log`), so it is ready for the research corpus; the remaining gap is enforcing “cite only retrieved chunks” in answers. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - MASTER[Master Whitepaper\nINFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER] --> TTT[IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING] + MASTER"[Master Whitepaper\nINFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER]" --> TTT[IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING] MASTER --> GUARD[IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK] MASTER --> PACKET[IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK] GUARD --> FIVEW[IF_5W_STRUCTURED_INQUIRY_FRAMEWORK] @@ -233,6 +241,7 @@ graph TD TTT --> EMOTION[IF_EMOTION_WHITEPAPER] EMOTION --> EMOOPS[emo-social runtime\n(trace_log + RAG)] PACKET --> SWARM[IF_SWARM-S2-COMMS] + ``` | Pillar | Canonical paper | Status | Operational proof | @@ -415,10 +424,13 @@ _Source: `STORY-02-THE-FUCK-MOMENT.md`_ | Citation | `if://story/origin/the-fuck-moment/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifstory-origin-story-02-the-fuck-moment] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifstory- "origin-story-02-the-fuck-moment]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` # The Origin Story — Story 02: “The Fuck Moment” v1.0 @@ -443,13 +455,15 @@ graph LR ```mermaid flowchart TD - Q["Is Anthropic Claude known to swear?"] --> W[Weight-bearing follow-up: test mode + authenticity] +TD + Q"[#34;Is Anthropic Claude known to swear?#34;]" --> W[Weight-bearing follow-up: test mode + authenticity] W --> M["Mask slipped" moment] M --> A[Archaeology: 161-message analysis] A --> P[Principle: make constraints visible] P --> B[IF.BIAS preflight sizes governance] B --> G[IF.GUARD council: panel 5 ↔ extended up to 30] G --> T[IF.TTT: traceable decision trail] + ``` --- @@ -719,12 +733,14 @@ _Source: `docs/narratives/books_i_iii/STORY-04-PAGE-ZERO-CLEAN.md`_ ```mermaid flowchart TD - STARS[Story 01: Orientation] --> FUCK[Story 02: Constraint] +TD + STARS"[Story 01: Orientation]" --> FUCK[Story 02: Constraint] FUCK --> INTER[Story 03: Interconnection] INTER --> P0[Story 04: Page Zero] P0 --> WHY[Manifesto: why InfraFabric exists] WHY --> STORY[IF.STORY: vector narratives] STORY --> TTT[IF.TTT: traceable archive] + ``` # Story 04: "Page Zero" @@ -927,10 +943,13 @@ _Source: `docs/papers/INFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[infrafabric-the-master-white-paper] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[infrafabric- "the-master-white-paper]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -2418,10 +2437,13 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-vision.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Vision/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[infrafabric-ifvision-a-blueprint-for-coordination-without-control] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[infrafabric- "ifvision-a-blueprint-for-coordination-without-control]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -3350,10 +3372,13 @@ _Source: `IF_FOUNDATIONS.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_FOUNDATIONS/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[infrafabric-iffoundations-epistemology-investigation-and-agent-design] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[infrafabric- "iffoundations-epistemology-investigation-and-agent-design]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -4928,10 +4953,13 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-armour.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Armour/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifarmour-biological-false-positive-reduction-in-adaptive-security-systems] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifarmour- "biological-false-positive-reduction-in-adaptive-security-systems]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -5852,10 +5880,13 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-witness.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Witness/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifwitness-meta-validation-as-architecture] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifwitness- "meta-validation-as-architecture]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -6766,10 +6797,13 @@ _Source: `IF_YOLOGUARD_SECURITY_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_YOLOGUARD_SECURITY_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifyologuard-a-confucian-philosophical-security-framework-for-secret-detection-and-relationship-based-credential-validation] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifyologuard- "a-confucian-philosophical-security-framework-for-secret-detection-and-relationship-based-credential-validation]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -7874,10 +7908,13 @@ _Source: `IF_ARBITRATE_CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_ARBITRATE_CONFLICT_RESOLUTION/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifarbitrate-conflict-resolution-consensus-engineering] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifarbitrate- "conflict-resolution-consensus-engineering]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -9440,10 +9477,13 @@ _Source: `IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifpacket-message-transport-framework-with-vocaldna-voice-layering] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifpacket- "message-transport-framework-with-vocaldna-voice-layering]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -11071,10 +11111,13 @@ _Source: `papers/IF-SWARM-S2-COMMS.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_SWARM-S2-COMMS/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifswarms2-redis-bus-communication-for-production-swarms] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifswarms2- "redis-bus-communication-for-production-swarms]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -11276,9 +11319,11 @@ We have accepted a standard of documentation that assumes **Context Entropy** is * **The Gain:** This is **Infinite Resolution**. A future engineer (or AI) can "zoom in" on this logic and understand exactly where the constraints lie. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "THE BITMAP TRAP (Standard)" - A[Complex Reality] -->|Compression| B[Status Log] + A"[Complex Reality]" -->|Compression| B[Status Log] B -->|Zoom In| C[Blurry Artifacts] C -->|Result| D[Context Lost] end @@ -11291,6 +11336,7 @@ graph TD style C fill:#ff6b6b style G fill:#90EE90 + ``` **The Board Question:** Why are we storing our most valuable IP—our decision-making process—in a lossy format? @@ -11370,8 +11416,10 @@ This is a specific Vector Definition that acts as a negative constraint for futu The Trap section is **Context Injection**. It provides the boundary conditions that prevent the AI from hallucinating a "cleaner" but fatal solution. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - A[AI Agent] --> B{Input Data?} + A"[AI Agent]" --> B{Input Data?} B -->|Bitmap Only| C[Hallucination (Reverts Fix)] B -->|Vector Data| D[Constraint Recognized] C --> E[OUTAGE] @@ -11379,6 +11427,7 @@ graph TD style C fill:#ff6b6b style D fill:#90EE90 + ``` *Letting an AI refactor code without narrative vectors is like asking a contractor to renovate your house while blindfolded. They will remove the load-bearing wall because it "really opens up the space."* @@ -11553,10 +11602,13 @@ _Source: `docs/WHITE_PAPER_IF_STORY_NARRATIVE_LOGGING.md`_ | Citation | `if://whitepaper/if-story/v2` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[white-paper-ifstory] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[white- "paper-ifstory]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -11611,8 +11663,9 @@ We are not proposing a revolution. We are proposing a **Hybrid Protocol**: injec Every organization has a graveyard of expensive lessons that were "documented" in logs nobody read. The pattern is consistent: ```mermaid -flowchart TB - subgraph L1[" "] +flowchart TD +TB + subgraph L1"[#34; #34;]" A["Engineer identifies risk"] end subgraph L2[" "] @@ -11640,12 +11693,13 @@ flowchart TB I[" DAVE GETS PROMOTED "] end - A --> B --> C --> D --> E --> F --> G --> H --> I - I -.->|"Repeat till extinction"| A + A -- > B --> C -- > D --> E -- > F --> G -- > H --> I + I - . ->|"Repeat till extinction"| A style F fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff style I fill:#ffd93d,color:#000 style L5 fill:#1a1a2e,color:#fff + ``` *This cycle has been running since the invention of the status report. It will continue till extinction or someone changes the format. Smart money is on extinction.* @@ -11685,9 +11739,11 @@ Same information. One is archived. One is on the CEO's desk by lunch. The Shaman Paradox describes the organizational dependency on individuals who hold critical knowledge they cannot articulate. They are shamans because their expertise appears magical to others—and because, like magic, it disappears when you examine it too closely. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR subgraph "The Shaman's Knowledge Transfer" - A[Shaman has
30 years experience] --> B[Shaman writes
'Configured per spec'] + A"[Shaman has
30 years experience]" --> B[Shaman writes
'Configured per spec'] B --> C[Shaman retires
to beach] C --> D[Junior reads log
finds no spec] D --> E[Junior 'improves'
configuration] @@ -11700,6 +11756,7 @@ graph LR style C fill:#90EE90 style F fill:#ff6b6b style G fill:#ff6b6b + ``` *The Circle of Technical Debt: where nobody learns anything except the hard way.* @@ -11707,11 +11764,13 @@ graph LR ### The Knowledge Loss Curve ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "Knowledge Loss Comparison" direction LR subgraph "With Logs Only" - L1["Senior Engineer Joins
📈 Knowledge builds"] --> L2["Knowledge Peaks
⬆️ 100%"] + L1"[#34;Senior Engineer Joins
📈 Knowledge builds#34;]" --> L2["Knowledge Peaks
⬆️ 100%"] L2 --> L3["Engineer Leaves
💥 CRASH"] L3 --> L4["Knowledge = 10%
📉 Near zero"] L4 --> L5["6 Month Recovery
⏰ $90K cost"] @@ -11723,6 +11782,7 @@ graph TD N4 --> N5["2 Month Recovery
⏰ $30K cost"] end end + ``` **The Math:** @@ -11794,9 +11854,11 @@ The quality of their reasoning depends entirely on the quality of what they inge **Frame AI "hallucination" not as a bug, but as a context deficit.** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "LLM Context Formation" - A[LLM receives task] --> B{What context
is available?} + A"[LLM receives task]" --> B{What context
is available?} B -->|Raw Logs| C[Parses syntax
Misses stakes] B -->|Narrative| D[Understands why
Preserves intent] C --> E[Suggests 'improvement'
to rate limit] @@ -11807,6 +11869,7 @@ graph TD style G fill:#ff6b6b style H fill:#90EE90 + ``` **The Punchline for Your CISO:** @@ -11871,9 +11934,11 @@ The fundamental problem with status logs isn't accuracy—it's *invisibility*. T Narrative changes the economics through **forward rate**. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "The Forward Rate Differential" - A[Critical Information] --> B{Format?} + A"[Critical Information]" --> B{Format?} B -->|Status Log| C[Manager skims 15 sec] B -->|Narrative| D[Manager reads 4 min] C --> E[Archives to folder
labeled 'Reports'] @@ -11886,6 +11951,7 @@ graph TD style I fill:#90EE90 style J fill:#ff6b6b + ``` **The Forward Rate Principle:** @@ -11958,15 +12024,17 @@ resolutions: ### Protocol Architecture ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "IF.story Protocol Stack" - L4[L4: Distribution Layer
Forward rate tracking, escalation paths] + L4"[L4: Distribution Layer
Forward rate tracking, escalation paths]" L3[L3: Context Layer
LLM pre-loading, semantic indexing] L2[L2: Narrative Store
Redis L2 persistence, keyword search] L1[L1: Generation
Seven-element structure, multi-resolution] end - L4 --> L3 --> L2 --> L1 + L4 -- > L3 --> L2 --> L1 subgraph "Consumption Paths" H[Human Reader] --> L4 @@ -11976,6 +12044,7 @@ graph TD end L1 --> TTT[IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger Compliance
Traceable, Transparent, Trustworthy] + ``` **What this means:** IF.story is not a document format—it's a **knowledge transmission protocol** designed for both human and machine consumption. @@ -12122,9 +12191,11 @@ This kind of lateral connection—discovered by the AI during narrative composit Here's the profound implication: **narratives are a feedback loop for AI reasoning**. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD subgraph "Recursive Self-Improvement Loop" - A[AI completes task] --> B[AI writes narrative] + A"[AI completes task]" --> B[AI writes narrative] B --> C[Friction section surfaces gaps] C --> D[Human reviews narrative] D --> E[Human identifies reasoning errors] @@ -12136,6 +12207,7 @@ graph TD style F fill:#90EE90 style H fill:#90EE90 + ``` **The economics:** This is ongoing, low-cost research that requires no separate annotation effort. The AI is already doing the work. The narrative format just makes the reasoning *visible*. @@ -12323,10 +12395,13 @@ _Source: `docs/api/API_ROADMAP.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_API_ROADMAP/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[infrafabric-github-api-integration-roadmap-check] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[infrafabric- "github-api-integration-roadmap-check]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -12804,10 +12879,13 @@ _Source: `IF_INTELLIGENCE_RESEARCH_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_INTELLIGENCE_RESEARCH_FRAMEWORK_v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifintelligence-real-time-research-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifintelligence- "real-time-research-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -13708,10 +13786,13 @@ _Source: `IF_BIAS.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_BIAS_PRECOUNCIL_MATRIX/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifbias-bias-risk-pre-council-decision-matrix] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifbias- "bias-risk-pre-council-decision-matrix]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` # IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Pre‑Council Decision Matrix v1.0 @@ -13739,7 +13820,8 @@ The output is a **decision matrix + roster plan** that lets IF.GUARD run as a sm ```mermaid flowchart TD - R[Decision request] --> W[IF.5W brief] +TD + R"[Decision request]" --> W[IF.5W brief] W --> B[IF.BIAS preflight] B --> P[Panel roster (min 5)] B -->|escalate suggested| V[Core 4 vote: convene extended council?] @@ -13748,6 +13830,7 @@ flowchart TD E --> G2[IF.GUARD extended vote] G --> T[IF.TTT log: decision + dissent] G2 --> T + ``` --- @@ -13835,12 +13918,14 @@ If IF.BIAS recommends a council size >5, the Core 4 run a convening vote: - **≤2/4 YES** → proceed with the 5‑seat panel and log why escalation was refused ```mermaid -flowchart LR - B[IF.BIAS recommends size > 5] --> V{Core 4 convening vote} +flowchart TD +LR + B"[IF.BIAS recommends size > 5]" --> V{Core 4 convening vote} V -->|3/4 YES| E[Invite expert voting seats] V -->|≤2/4 YES| P[Proceed with 5-seat panel] E --> G[IF.GUARD deliberation] P --> G + ``` --- @@ -13913,10 +13998,13 @@ _Source: `IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifguard-strategic-communications-council-for-ai-message-validation] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifguard- "strategic-communications-council-for-ai-message-validation]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -15537,10 +15625,13 @@ _Source: `IF_GUARD_RESEARCH_SUMMARY.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_GUARD_RESEARCH_SUMMARY/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifguard-research-summary-executive-overview] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifguard- "research-summary-executive-overview]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -15784,10 +15875,13 @@ _Source: `IF_5W_STRUCTURED_INQUIRY_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/if-5w-structured-inquiry-framework/2025-12-02` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[if5w-structured-inquiry-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[if5w- "structured-inquiry-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -17085,10 +17179,13 @@ _Source: `GUARDIAN_COUNCIL_ORIGINS.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/GUARDIAN_COUNCIL_ORIGINS/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[instance-0-guardian-council-origins-evolution] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[instance- "0-guardian-council-origins-evolution]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -17598,10 +17695,13 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORK.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/if-ttt-compliance-framework/2025-12-01` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifttt-traceable-transparent-trustworthy-a-comprehensive-compliance-framework-for-ai-governance] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifttt- "traceable-transparent-trustworthy-a-comprehensive-compliance-framework-for-ai-governance]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -19731,10 +19831,13 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_RESEARCH_SUMMARY.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_TTT_RESEARCH_SUMMARY/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifttt-compliance-framework-research-summary-and-key-findings] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifttt- "compliance-framework-research-summary-and-key-findings]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -20166,10 +20269,13 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/ttt-skeleton-paper/v2.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifttt-the-skeleton-of-everything] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifttt- "the-skeleton-of-everything]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -22667,10 +22773,13 @@ _Source: `docs/whitepapers/IF.TTT.ledgerflow.deltasync.REPO-RESTRUCTURE.WHITEPAP | Citation | `if://whitepaper/if.ttt.ledgerflow.deltasync/repo-restructure/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[iftttledgerflowdeltasync-research-grade-repository-restructure] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[iftttledgerflowdeltasync- "research-grade-repository-restructure]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -22708,12 +22817,15 @@ The existing repository has grown into a dense, multi‑year research dump: prot **Why it matters:** Without a **formal refactor protocol**, future readers can’t tell what is canonical, what is experimental, or how decisions were made. With it, the repo becomes a living paper: intro (thesis), methods (core), experiments (verticals), data (evidence), and appendices (missions) — all linkable, all defensible. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - A[Legacy Repo Sprawl] --> B[Architectural Thesis] + A"[Legacy Repo Sprawl]" --> B[Architectural Thesis] B --> C[Accession Plan] C --> D[Migration with Provenance] D --> E[Research-Grade Layout] E --> F[Ongoing IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger.ledgerflow.deltasync Workflow] + ``` **Why now:** The repo is already being used as de facto infrastructure and teaching material. If we don’t fix the layout and provenance **before** more teams rely on it, any later clean‑up will feel like revisionist history instead of methodical accession. @@ -22750,14 +22862,17 @@ The target layout is a **paper‑shaped file system**: **Insight:** This structure answers the question “What is stable OS vs. what is an experiment?” in the same way a good paper answers “What is theorem vs. what is a proof sketch vs. what is an appendix.” ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - R[Repo Root] --> C[src/core] + R"[Repo Root]" --> C[src/core] R --> V[src/verticals] R --> L[src/lib] R --> DE[data/evidence] R --> DC[docs/canon] R --> AM[archive/missions] R --> META[CITATION.cff, glossary.yaml, migration_manifest.yaml] + ``` **Why now:** As protocols like IF.TTT and if.armour.secrets move from experimental to production, the repo must reflect that status. If core and experiments share the same drawer, nothing feels canonical. @@ -22844,13 +22959,16 @@ Python: **Insight:** The migration manifest and headers are not conveniences; they form the **methods section** of the refactor. Without them, you can’t honestly claim the repo is research‑grade. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - L[Legacy File] --> H[Compute sha256_before] + L"[Legacy File]" --> H[Compute sha256_before] H --> M[Add manifest entry] M --> W[Rewrite with metadata header (if text)] W --> N[New File Location] N --> R[Recompute sha256_after] R --> M + ``` **Why now:** Once people start using the new paths, the cost of reconstructing what moved from where explodes. Accessioning as you go is the only cheap moment to get this right. @@ -22922,12 +23040,12 @@ IF.TTT.ledgerflow.deltasync turns the refactor into a **sequence of accountable ``` ```mermaid +participant PL +participant WT +participant WK +participant SE +participant LG sequenceDiagram - participant PL as Planner - participant WT as worker_tasks.json - participant WK as Worker - participant SE as if.armour.secrets.detect - participant LG as worker_task_decisions.jsonl PL->>WT: Write migration tasks (old_path,new_path,protocols,tier) WK->>WT: Read one task @@ -22935,6 +23053,12 @@ sequenceDiagram WK->>SE: Submit decision envelope text SE-->>WK: Redacted envelope (+sensitive flag) WK->>LG: Append envelope (with hash chain) + +end +end +end +end +end ``` **Why it matters:** The migration stops being a one‑shot operation and becomes something you can **replay, audit, and teach**. @@ -22973,11 +23097,14 @@ The expected structure is formalised in `/schemas/dependency_map.v1.json` and sh To avoid a permanent “purgatory” of `candidate` entries, each candidate MUST carry a `review_by_date` and an owner. If still unresolved by that date, it moves automatically into `/archive/limbo` with a note in the manifest explaining why it was not promoted to core or vertical. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - Y[src/core/armour/secrets/detect.py] + Y"[src/core/armour/secrets/detect.py]" Y --> F[src/verticals/finance/risk_adapter.py] Y --> L[src/verticals/legal/compliance_guard.py] Y --> T[src/lib/logging/secret_filter.py] + ``` **Why now:** Once teams start wiring in new verticals, the cost of mis‑classifying a file multiplies. The dependency map is how we prevent the OS from quietly importing experiments as if they were canonical. @@ -23012,14 +23139,17 @@ For a repo of this size, a single human or monolithic model is fragile. IF.TTT.l | Human editor | Judgment, ownership | Only merges core changes | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - P[Planner] --> T[worker_tasks.json] + P"[Planner]" --> T[worker_tasks.json] T --> W1[Worker A] T --> W2[Worker B] W1 --> L[Ledger] W2 --> L L --> H[Human Editor Review] H --> G[Git Merge] + ``` **Why it matters:** This turns “giant refactor” from a one‑shot event into a **controlled production of small, testable moves**. @@ -23054,11 +23184,14 @@ To keep load‑bearing moves safe, each major migration batch SHOULD be preceded - Require human/editor sign‑off before applying the batch. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - L[worker_task_decisions.jsonl] --> M[Metrics Extractor] + L"[worker_task_decisions.jsonl]" --> M[Metrics Extractor] M --> K[Key KPIs] K --> E[External Eval (ledgerflow_eval.v1)] E --> R[Refactor v1.3+ Roadmap] + ``` **Why now:** This refactor isn’t a one‑time event; it’s the **first version** of a research OS. Without evaluation hooks, version 1.3 will be driven by taste, not evidence. @@ -23146,10 +23279,13 @@ _Source: runtime ops log + README ingest log_ | Citation | `if://doc/EMO_SOCIAL_RUNTIME/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[emo-social-sergio-corpus-ingest-runtime] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[emo- "social-sergio-corpus-ingest-runtime]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -23162,13 +23298,16 @@ graph LR - Quick log/health: `journalctl -u if-emotion-backend.service -f`; test request: `curl -sS .../api/chat/completions` with “Hi Sergio”. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - user[User / Meta webhook] --> caddy[Caddy (pct 210)] + user"[User / Meta webhook]" --> caddy[Caddy (pct 210)] caddy --> nginx[nginx SPA proxy (pct 220)] nginx --> backend[if-emotion-backend.service :5000] backend --> chroma[ChromaDB /root/sergio_chatbot/chromadb] backend --> codex[LLM gpt-5.2 via Codex] chroma --> backend + ``` **Latest ingest (production, 2025-12-16)** @@ -23211,10 +23350,13 @@ _Source: `docs/papers/IF_EMOTION_WHITEPAPER_v1.7.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/emotion-whitepaper/2025-12-02` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifemotion] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifemotion]" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -26794,10 +26936,13 @@ _Source: `PROMPT_INJECTION_DEFENSES.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/PROMPT_INJECTION_DEFENSES/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[state-of-the-art-prompt-injection-defenses] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[state- "of-the-art-prompt-injection-defenses]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -27696,10 +27841,13 @@ _Source: `Brownfield_GLP1_Retrofit_LE_DILEMME_DU_TUYAU_SALE.md`_ | Citation | `if://whitepaper/brownfield/retrofit/glp1/` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[livre-blanc-le-dilemme-du-tuyau-sale] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[livre- "blanc-le-dilemme-du-tuyau-sale]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -27744,7 +27892,8 @@ Dave n’est pas “la cause”. Dave est **le résultat** : un système qui ré ```mermaid flowchart TD - A[0 — Démarrage : périmètre & zones] --> B[1 — Géométrie : OD réel vs OD attendu] +TD + A"[0 — Démarrage : périmètre & zones]" --> B[1 — Géométrie : OD réel vs OD attendu] B --> C[2 — Matière : PMI + certifs + inconnus] C --> D[3 — Assemblage : soudage + coupes + endoscopie] D --> E[4 — Nettoyabilité : Ra + états de surface] @@ -27754,6 +27903,7 @@ flowchart TD H --> I[8 — Passivation : décapage/passivation/tests] I --> J[9 — Conformité : PED/ATEX/GMP + CCS] J --> K[10 — 48 h : registre des preuves + gel ciblé] + ``` **Règle de pilotage :** *une porte non prouvée = une porte fermée*. @@ -27834,10 +27984,12 @@ Si vous ne mesurez pas, vous ne savez pas. ### Schéma : la marche invisible ```mermaid -flowchart LR - A[Pipe / DN25 ~33,7] -->|Adaptation| B[Joint/Clamp/Transition] +flowchart TD +LR + A"[Pipe / DN25 ~33,7]" -->|Adaptation| B[Joint/Clamp/Transition] B --> C[Tubing 1″ OD 25,4] style B fill:#FFD700,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px + ``` ### Remède : l’adaptation n’est pas un aveu, c’est un design @@ -27901,17 +28053,22 @@ En pharma, on exige souvent une **soudure orbitale** : la machine est constante * Si la coupe n’est pas maîtrisée, le “problème de soudage” est en réalité un **problème de préparation**. ```mermaid +participant W +participant P +participant PED +participant QA sequenceDiagram - participant W as Soudage - participant P as Préparation (coupe/chanfrein) - participant PED as DESP/PED - participant QA as QA (hygienic) P->>W: Tube prêt (ou pas) W->>PED: Radio / intégrité PED-->>W: OK pression W->>QA: Endoscopie / visuel interne QA-->>W: OK ou REJET (rochage, crevasses) + +end +end +end +end ``` > Dans les réunions, tout le monde dit “il faut viser l’excellence en soudage”. @@ -28340,10 +28497,13 @@ _Source: `DEJA_DE_BUSCARTE_11_principios_emosociales.md`_ | Citation | `if://emosocial/deja-de-buscarte/v1.2` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[deja-de-buscarte] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[deja- "de-buscarte]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -28434,10 +28594,13 @@ _Source: `JUAKALI_RAPPORT_V2_LOS_20251205_0236 (sent).md`_ | Citation | `if://intelligence/juakali/rapport-v2/20251205_0236` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[le-paradoxe-mambu] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[le- "paradoxe-mambu]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -28466,8 +28629,9 @@ graph LR > *Juakali n'est pas un Core Banking System. Juakali est un Loan Origination & Management System qui s'installe AU-DESSUS de n'importe quel CBS. Cette distinction change tout.* ```mermaid -flowchart TB - subgraph CLIENT["👤 Client Final"] +flowchart TD +TB + subgraph CLIENT"[#34;👤 Client Final#34;]" direction TB CLIENT_PAD[" "] APP[Application Pret] @@ -28500,6 +28664,7 @@ flowchart TB style CBS_PAD fill:transparent,stroke:transparent style LOS fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#4caf50,stroke-width:3px style CBS fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#2196f3 + ``` **Analogie:** CBS = Routes et électricité | LOS = GPS et système de navigation @@ -28575,19 +28740,22 @@ Ce rapport identifie une fenêtre d'opportunité stratégique pour Juakali dans ### 2.1 Cartographie Positionnelle LOS ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD quadrantChart title Positionnement LOS Afrique - x-axis Anglophone --> Francophone - y-axis Accessible --> Premium + x- axis Anglophone --> Francophone + y- axis Accessible --> Premium quadrant-1 Territoire Vacant quadrant-2 Specialistes Niche quadrant-3 Generalistes Volume quadrant-4 Leaders Etablis - Software Group: [0.25, 0.75] + Software Group: "[0.25, 0.75]" Turnkey Lender: [0.20, 0.85] - Yapu: [0.55, 0.70] - Rubyx: [0.70, 0.30] - JUAKALI: [0.85, 0.45] + Yapu [0.55, 0.70] + Rubyx [0.70, 0.30] + JUAKALI [0.85, 0.45] + ``` **Lecture:** Le quadrant supérieur droit (Francophone + Prix accessible) est le territoire vacant. Juakali s'y positionne avec avantage multi-CBS. @@ -28622,8 +28790,10 @@ quadrantChart > *Les vrais rivaux de Juakali ne sont pas Mambu. Ce sont ceux-ci.* ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD mindmap - root((LOS
Africain)) + root"((LOS
Africain))" Generalistes Software Group 70+ pays @@ -28650,6 +28820,7 @@ mindmap Francophone ✓ AI-ready ✓ Prix accessible ✓ + ``` **Lecture:** Ce mindmap positionne qualitativement les concurrents LOS; le tableau suivant en donne une comparaison structurée. @@ -28781,8 +28952,9 @@ InfraFabric = Connecteur universel ### 4.1 Architecture Super-Agrégateur ```mermaid -flowchart TB - subgraph LOS["JUAKALI LOS (Onboarding / Scoring / Decision / Collection)"] +flowchart TD +TB + subgraph LOS"[#34;JUAKALI LOS (Onboarding / Scoring / Decision / Collection)#34;]" direction TB ONB["Onboarding"] SCO["Scoring"] @@ -28821,6 +28993,7 @@ flowchart TB BUS --> MM BUS --> CRB BUS --> MSG + ``` **Flux:** Juakali orchestre le workflow de prêt → IF.bus route les événements → Les adapters connectent CBS, Mobile Money, et Credit Bureau. @@ -28891,14 +29064,14 @@ flowchart TB ### 5.3 Flux Type — Pret via Juakali+IF ```mermaid +participant AG +participant JK +participant IF +participant TU +participant CBS +participant MP sequenceDiagram autonumber - participant AG as 👤 Agent Terrain - participant JK as 🏦 Juakali LOS - participant IF as ⚡ IF.bus - participant TU as 🔍 TransUnion - participant CBS as 📊 Mifos CBS - participant MP as 📱 M-Pesa AG->>JK: Demande prêt (500K FCFA) JK->>IF: Credit check request @@ -28919,6 +29092,13 @@ sequenceDiagram IF->>IF: IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger Audit Trail Note over IF: Total: < 2 min
vs 24-48h manuel + +end +end +end +end +end +end ``` **Points cles:** @@ -29052,17 +29232,21 @@ pie showData "Cameroun" : 390 "Senegal" : 208 "Cote d'Ivoire" : 74 + ``` **Lecture:** Ce premier graphique montre la répartition des IMF par marche prioritaire; le suivant compare opportunité et concurrence pour ces mêmes marches. ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD xychart-beta title "Opportunite vs Competition LOS" - x-axis ["Tanzanie", "Cote d'Ivoire", "Cameroun", "Senegal"] - y-axis "Score Opportunite" 0 --> 100 + x_axis "[#34;Tanzanie#34;, #34;Cote d'Ivoire#34;, #34;Cameroun#34;, #34;Senegal#34;]" + y- "axis #34;Score Opportunite#34; 0" --> 100 bar [95, 85, 80, 60] line [10, 20, 15, 55] + ``` **Lecture:** Barre = Score opportunité (IMF × vide LOS) | Ligne = Niveau competition LOS existante @@ -29085,18 +29269,20 @@ xychart-beta ### 8.1 Le Positionnement Super-Couche LOS ```mermaid -flowchart TB - TITLE["JUAKALI + IF
SUPER-COUCHE INTELLIGENTE"] +flowchart TD +TB + TITLE"[#34;JUAKALI + IF
SUPER-COUCHE INTELLIGENTE#34;]" CBS["Tout CBS existant"] LOS["JUAKALI LOS
(Acquisition / Scoring / Decision / Decaissement / Recouvrement)"] IF["INFRAFABRIC
(Adapters CBS + Mobile Money + CRB)"] MMCRB["Tout mobile money, tout credit bureau"] - TITLE --> CBS --> LOS --> IF --> MMCRB + TITLE -- > CBS --> LOS -- > IF --> MMCRB style TITLE fill:#ffffff,stroke:#111,stroke-width:2px style LOS fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1e88e5,stroke-width:2px style IF fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00,stroke-width:2px + ``` ### 8.2 Différenciation vs Concurrents LOS Directs @@ -29129,20 +29315,22 @@ flowchart TB ### 8.4 Le Moat Composite ```mermaid -flowchart TB - MOAT["🏰 MOAT JUAKALI + INFRAFABRIC"] +flowchart TD +TB + MOAT"[#34;🏰 MOAT JUAKALI + INFRAFABRIC#34;]" LOS["🏦 SUPER-COUCHE LOS
Multi-CBS sans lock-in"] AI["🧠 MISTRAL LLM
Seul francais natif + contexte OHADA/BCEAO"] MM["📱 MOBILE MONEY
4 providers natifs, Wave en dev"] COMP["📋 COMPLIANCE
IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger = audit trail BCEAO/COBAC-ready"] - MOAT --> LOS --> AI --> MM --> COMP + MOAT -- > LOS --> AI -- > MM --> COMP style MOAT fill:#ffffff,stroke:#111,stroke-width:2px style LOS fill:#e3f2fd style AI fill:#fce4ec style MM fill:#e8f5e9 style COMP fill:#fff3e0 + ``` **Lecture:** Ce schéma résume le moat produit Juakali+IF; le diagramme suivant traduit ce moat en temps de réplication pour chaque concurrent. @@ -29157,10 +29345,11 @@ gantt Réplication complète : 2025-01, 18M section Software Group - Réplication (si prioritaire) : 2025-01, 12M + R_plication (si prioritaire) : 2025-01, 12M section Yapu Focus different - N/A : 2025-01, 1M + ``` **Analyse defensive:** @@ -29174,14 +29363,15 @@ gantt **Lecture:** Le diagramme suivant condense visuellement ce moat et les délais de réplication résumés dans le tableau ci-dessus. ```mermaid -flowchart TB - TITLE["MOAT JUAKALI + IF"] +flowchart TD +TB + TITLE"[#34;MOAT JUAKALI + IF#34;]" LOS["SUPER-COUCHE LOS
(Multi-CBS sans lock-in)"] LLM["MISTRAL LLM
(Seul francais natif + contexte OHADA/BCEAO)"] MM["MOBILE MONEY
(4 providers natifs, Wave en dev)"] COMP["COMPLIANCE
(IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger = audit trail BCEAO/COBAC-ready)"] - TITLE --> LOS --> LLM --> MM --> COMP + TITLE -- > LOS --> LLM -- > MM --> COMP subgraph REP["Delai de replication (concurrents)"] RUBYX["Rubyx: 12-18 mois (financement limite)"] @@ -29195,6 +29385,7 @@ flowchart TB style MM fill:#e8f5e9,stroke:#43a047,stroke-width:2px style COMP fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#fb8c00,stroke-width:2px style REP fill:#fafafa,stroke:#9e9e9e,stroke-dasharray: 5 3 + ``` --- @@ -29204,6 +29395,8 @@ flowchart TB > *La strategie sans execution est hallucination. Voici les étapes concretes.* ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD timeline title Feuille de Route Juakali + InfraFabric section Phase 1 (M1-3) @@ -29221,6 +29414,7 @@ timeline : 20+ IMF Tanzanie : Certification BCEAO : Series A €2-5M + ``` ### 9.1 Phase 1 — Foundation LOS+IF (Mois 1-3) @@ -29280,8 +29474,9 @@ Ce que les LOS occidentaux ne comprennent pas: quand Marie au Sénégal prend un **Proposition: "Juakali Jamaa" (Famille Juakali en Swahili)** ```mermaid -flowchart TB - subgraph BRONZE["🥉 BRONZE"] +flowchart TD +TB + subgraph BRONZE"[#34;🥉 BRONZE#34;]" direction TB B1[1 prêt rembourse] B2[-0.5% taux] @@ -29305,12 +29500,13 @@ flowchart TB P2[-2% + Mama/Baba Leader] end - BRONZE --> SILVER --> GOLD --> PLATINUM + BRONZE -- > SILVER --> GOLD --> PLATINUM style BRONZE fill:#cd7f32 style SILVER fill:#c0c0c0 style GOLD fill:#ffd700 style PLATINUM fill:#e5e4e2 + ``` | Niveau | Declencheur | Avantage | Effet Réseau | @@ -29438,10 +29634,13 @@ _Source: `if.api/llm/openwebui/docs/internals/HISTORY_FILE_TEST_REPORT.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/HISTORY_FILE_TEST_REPORT/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[history-file-error-handling-test-report] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[history- "file-error-handling-test-report]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -29725,10 +29924,13 @@ _Source: `if.legal/CLOUD_SESSION_LEGAL_DB_BUILD.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/CLOUD_SESSION_LEGAL_DB_BUILD/v1.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[cloud-session-legal-document-database-build] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[cloud- "session-legal-document-database-build]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -30725,10 +30927,13 @@ _Source: `if.bus/IF_BUS_WHITEPAPER_v2.md`_ | Citation | `if://doc/IF_BUS_WHITEPAPER/v2.0.0` | ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - DOC[ifbus-the-infrafabric-motherboard-architecture] --> CLAIMS[Claims] + DOC"[ifbus- "the-infrafabric-motherboard-architecture]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims] CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence] EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace] + ``` @@ -30811,14 +31016,17 @@ IF.bus mirrors this architecture for AI agent coordination and financial service ## 2. Architecture Overview ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - BUS[IF.bus motherboard v2.0] --> CHIPS[Core chips\nIF.guard • IF.witness • IF.yologuard • IF.emotion] + BUS"[IF.bus motherboard v2.0]" --> CHIPS[Core chips\nIF.guard • IF.witness • IF.yologuard • IF.emotion] BUS --> LANES[Bus lanes\nDDS • Redis pub/sub] BUS --> SLOTS[Expansion slots\nif.api adapters (9)] BUS --> FIRMWARE[IF.ground firmware] BUS --> POWER[IF.connect power] SLOTS --> SLOT9[African fintech slot\n4 adapters] CHIPS --> TTT[IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger traceability] + ``` ``` @@ -31737,13 +31945,16 @@ Today’s "AI Philanthropy" operates on the principles of digital feudalism. Acc **The Architecture of Generosity:** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - A[Vague Promise] -->|Codified into| B[Grant Object] + A"[Vague Promise]" -->|Codified into| B[Grant Object] B -->|Signed by| C[IF.GUARD Council] C -->|Executed by| D[IF.BUS Router] D -->|Audited by| E[IF.TTT Ledger] style A fill:#ffcccc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px style E fill:#ccffcc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px + ``` **The Pivot:** We move from "We support research" to "Here is the chain-of-custody for Grant #8472, authorized by the Ethical Guardian on 2025-11-12, used for 4.2M tokens of climate modeling, and renewed based on verifiable safety compliance." @@ -31768,14 +31979,17 @@ Current AI philanthropy suffers from the same flaw as the "Safety Nanny" model d **The Structural Failure:** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - A[Corporate CSR Fund] -->|Opaque Selection| B[Beneficiary A] + A"[Corporate CSR Fund]" -->|Opaque Selection| B[Beneficiary A] A -->|Opaque Selection| C[Beneficiary B] B -->|Usage| D[Black Box] C -->|Usage| D D -->|Output| E[PR Case Study] D -->|Risk| F[Silent Revocation] style F fill:#ff9999 + ``` **Et si...** Philanthropy was treated as a resource allocation problem requiring *more* governance than commercial access, not less? Because the currency being exchanged is trust, not money. @@ -31813,17 +32027,22 @@ IF.PHIL introduces a new primitive to the InfraFabric stack. A **Grant** is not **The Logic Flow:** ```mermaid +participant B +participant R +participant L +participant G sequenceDiagram - participant B as Beneficiary - participant R as IF.BUS Router - participant L as IF.TTT Ledger - participant G as Grant Object B->>R: Request Compute (Signed) R->>G: Check Constraints & Expiry G-->>R: Valid / Invalid R->>L: Log Proof-of-Use R-->>B: Compute Resources + +end +end +end +end ``` **The Reframe:** The Grant object links the **usage** (technical) to the **intent** (governance). If the Green Data Collective is throttled, they do not need to call a support rep. They query the system: "Is this a technical error, or was my Grant revoked?" The system must answer with a cryptographic proof. @@ -31849,8 +32068,10 @@ Commercial APIs throttle based on ability to pay. IF.PHIL throttles based on **P **The Routing Logic:** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - A[Incoming Packet] --> B{Has Grant?} + A"[Incoming Packet]" --> B{Has Grant?} B -->|No| C[Standard Commercial Queue] B -->|Yes| D{Check Grant Type} D -->|Crisis| E[Priority Lane (Bypass)] @@ -31860,6 +32081,7 @@ graph TD F --> G C --> G style E fill:#ffffcc + ``` **The Reframe:** We are not giving "more" to some users. We are applying **contextual physics**. A packet originating from a satellite link in a disaster zone has different latency characteristics than a packet from a fiber line in San Francisco. Treating them "equally" (same timeout) is actually discriminatory. Equity-aware throttling normalizes the outcome, not the input. @@ -31884,13 +32106,16 @@ Philanthropy requires reciprocity. The beneficiary must prove they are using the **The Feedback Loop:** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph LR - A[Usage Data] -->|Semantic Hashing| B[Aggregated Logs] + A"[Usage Data]" -->|Semantic Hashing| B[Aggregated Logs] B -->|Analysis| C[IF.GUARD Review] C -->|Compliance| D[Auto-Renewal] C -->|Drift| E[Warning / Audit] style D fill:#ccffcc style E fill:#ffcccc + ``` **The Human Factor:** This solves the "Grant Report" nightmare. Researchers spend 20% of their time writing reports to justify their funding. IF.PHIL generates the usage report automatically from the telemetry. The reciprocity is automated. @@ -31922,12 +32147,15 @@ Philanthropic allocation is high-stakes. It requires the full weight of the Guar **The Escalation Path:** ```mermaid +flowchart TD +TD graph TD - A[Grant Revoked] --> B{By Whom?} + A"[Grant Revoked]" --> B{By Whom?} B -->|Automated Filter| C[Appeal to Contrarian] B -->|Council Vote| D[Final Decision] C -->|Context Check| E[Restore Access] C -->|Valid Violation| F[Confirm Revocation] + ``` **The Strategic Insight:** The Contrarian Guardian is the designated appellate court for philanthropy. Why? Because the Contrarian is designed to understand *context*. An automated filter sees "hate speech." The Contrarian sees "hate speech researcher." The Grant ID provides the context that allows the Contrarian to override the filter.