danny/Infrafabric-POC-docs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Rebalance reviewer map table by shortening link text

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
root 2025-12-21 16:03:37 +00:00
parent 47bf1c8b90
commit a1fcefca6d
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
View file

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard
| Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) |
|---|---|---|
| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundles**: the IF.emotion trace protocol ships a portable tarball + manifest + verifier steps that a third party can run. Start here: `https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md` (includes end‑to‑end verification appendix). | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundles**: the IF.emotion trace protocol ships a portable tarball + manifest + verifier steps that a third party can run.<br/>Start here: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled) — end‑to‑end verification appendix](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md). | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. |
| **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD**: risk preflight sizes councils and escalates; councils preserve dissent and veto paths; decisions are traced. Pointers: IF.BIAS, IF.GUARD, IF.5W sections. | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller councils or fast-track gates. |
| **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD**: epistemic/anomaly detection primitives and secret/relationship screening patterns (architecture + docs). | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. |