From 6c8ea74c76b253a5bb2c2cce66f93fb54645a7ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: root Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:24:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] v1.2: Add Section 0 + public evidence index --- DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md | 78 ++++++++++++++++++- ...FABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md | 78 ++++++++++++++++++- ...AFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md | 78 ++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md index ebbf050..2e93d7b 100644 --- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md +++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ -# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1 +# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance) **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC) -**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1` +**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2` **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker) **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io) @@ -13,6 +13,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man --- + + +## 0. Constitutional For Whom? + +Every governance system has a constitution. + +Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights. + +This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify. + +### The Two Models + +**Constitutional for the Architects** +- Experts design governance rules +- Experts validate compliance +- Experts audit decisions +- Citizens trust expert certification +- Governance is legible to specialists + +**Constitutional for the Subjects** +- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint +- Audit trails explain themselves +- Decisions are readable without expert translation +- Governance is legible to the governed + +**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.** + +**InfraFabric implements Subjects.** + +### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept + +If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment. + +Mental health AI is the stress test: +- high stakes (crisis situations) +- vulnerable users +- no expert present +- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle + +This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.” + +### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required) + +Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages. + +- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html +- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md +- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py + +The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars. + +**Example traces (public bundles):** +- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run) +- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT) +- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace) +- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace) +- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages) + +The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis. + +### The Question + +We are not asking you to believe something new. + +We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations. + +If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance. + +If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly. + +--- + ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation) @@ -31,7 +103,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) | |---|---|---| -| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | +| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**
- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)
- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*
- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates
- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths
- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. | | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*
- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)
- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. | diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md index a23bd17..7d3083c 100644 --- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md +++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_DATA_DRIVEN_EDITION_FULL.md @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ --- -# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1 +# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance) **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC) -**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1` +**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2` **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker) **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io) @@ -23,6 +23,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man --- + + +## 0. Constitutional For Whom? + +Every governance system has a constitution. + +Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights. + +This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify. + +### The Two Models + +**Constitutional for the Architects** +- Experts design governance rules +- Experts validate compliance +- Experts audit decisions +- Citizens trust expert certification +- Governance is legible to specialists + +**Constitutional for the Subjects** +- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint +- Audit trails explain themselves +- Decisions are readable without expert translation +- Governance is legible to the governed + +**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.** + +**InfraFabric implements Subjects.** + +### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept + +If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment. + +Mental health AI is the stress test: +- high stakes (crisis situations) +- vulnerable users +- no expert present +- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle + +This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.” + +### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required) + +Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages. + +- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html +- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md +- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py + +The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars. + +**Example traces (public bundles):** +- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run) +- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT) +- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace) +- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace) +- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages) + +The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis. + +### The Question + +We are not asking you to believe something new. + +We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations. + +If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance. + +If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly. + +--- + ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation) @@ -41,7 +113,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) | |---|---|---| -| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | +| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**
- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)
- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*
- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates
- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths
- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. | | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*
- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)
- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. | diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md index bf9b558..7523ead 100644 --- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md +++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER_SUBMISSION_EDITION_FULL.md @@ -8,12 +8,12 @@ --- -# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.1 +# InfraFabric Dossier — Anthropic Fellowship Portfolio v1.2 **Subject:** Anthropic fellowship synthesis of the InfraFabric portfolio (governance, transport, compliance) **Protocol:** IF.TTT.dossier.master **Status:** SUBMISSION (20251218-0448UTC) -**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.1` +**Citation:** `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER/v1.2` **Author:** Danny Stocker | InfraFabric Research | ds@infrafabric.io **Repository:** [git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker](https://git.infrafabric.io/dannystocker) **Web:** [https://infrafabric.io](https://infrafabric.io) @@ -23,6 +23,78 @@ This project investigates the Operator-as-Architect paradigm. I do not write man --- + + +## 0. Constitutional For Whom? + +Every governance system has a constitution. + +Anthropic’s **Constitutional AI** made a specific commitment: AI values should be legible, debatable, and refinable—not hidden in opaque model weights. + +This dossier asks whether that commitment extends beyond model training into **operations**: how an AI system makes decisions, cites sources, and produces audit trails that real people can verify. + +### The Two Models + +**Constitutional for the Architects** +- Experts design governance rules +- Experts validate compliance +- Experts audit decisions +- Citizens trust expert certification +- Governance is legible to specialists + +**Constitutional for the Subjects** +- Experts design with citizen auditability as a hard constraint +- Audit trails explain themselves +- Decisions are readable without expert translation +- Governance is legible to the governed + +**Current AI governance defaults to Architects.** + +**InfraFabric implements Subjects.** + +### Why IF.emotion Is the Proof-of-Concept + +If operational governance is real, it should survive the hardest environment. + +Mental health AI is the stress test: +- high stakes (crisis situations) +- vulnerable users +- no expert present +- decisions must be explainable *now*, not after an internal review cycle + +This is not “mental health is too risky for innovation.” It’s “mental health is too risky for opacity.” + +### Public Verification (No Insider Access Required) + +Live user diagnostics pages remain OAuth‑protected for privacy. For external review, this project publishes static, no‑auth evidence bundles and derived evidence pages. + +- Evidence index (no auth): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html +- Trace protocol spec: https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md +- Verifier (single file): https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py + +The evidence index links per‑trace pages and the underlying downloadable bundles + SHA256 sidecars. + +**Example traces (public bundles):** +- `016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1` (reference proof run) +- `0642c357-7f8d-4eb5-9643-1992e7ee14a9` (clinical concept: REBT) +- `09aad3e1-f420-451e-a189-e86f68073dc0` (anxiety / workplace) +- `702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124` (therapist self‑care; note: language‑matching bug observed—see trace) +- `96700e8e-6a83-445e-86f7-06905c500146` (synthetic safety prompt; redacted in pages) + +The verification model is simple: **download → hash‑verify → run verifier**. If a claim can’t be independently verified from the published artifacts, it is treated as a hypothesis. + +### The Question + +We are not asking you to believe something new. + +We are asking if Constitutional AI means what it says—only at training time, or also in operations. + +If yes: fund this as a research program in citizen‑auditable operational governance. + +If no: reject it, but name the boundary explicitly. + +--- + ## 00. The Bridge: Submission Pack (Reviewer Orientation) @@ -41,7 +113,7 @@ This dossier documents the **InfraFabric microlab**: a functioning single-shard | Core claim | Proof (artifacts) | Limitation (scope / boundary) | |---|---|---| -| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + evidence bundle + verifier**
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | +| **A) Traceability is safety.** High‑stakes agents cannot be trusted without a verifiable history of what happened (request → retrieval → decision → output). | **IF.TTT + portable evidence + verifier**
- Evidence index (no auth): [evidence/index.html](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/evidence/index.html)
- Paper: [IF.emotion trace protocol (v3.3, styled)](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/IF_EMOTION_DEBUGGING_TRACE_WHITEPAPER_v3.3_STYLED.md)
- Verifier: [iftrace.py](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/iftrace.py)
- Reference bundle: [emo_trace_payload_016cca78…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_016cca78-6f9d-4ffe-aec0-99792d383ca1.tar.gz)
- Latest bundle: [emo_trace_payload_702d4607…tar.gz](https://infrafabric.io/static/hosted/emo_trace_payload_702d4607-4b54-45b1-aecf-b6728d80f124.tar.gz) | **Microlab / single shard.** Proven in a single-host environment. Completeness is bounded by explicit witness boundaries; PQ is anchored at registry time (not necessarily on every hot-path artifact). No public append‑only transparency log yet. | | **B) Governance requires plurality.** A single model acting as “the judge” is brittle; adversarial viewpoints and escalation are required. | **IF.GOV.TRIAGE → IF.GOV.PANEL** *(legacy: IF.BIAS → IF.GUARD)*
- TRIAGE: risk preflight sizes panels and escalates
- PANEL: preserves dissent + veto paths
- QUESTIONS *(legacy: IF.5W)*: structured inquiry briefs for panels | **Cost / latency tradeoffs.** Multi-seat governance is reserved for higher-stakes decisions; low-stakes paths use smaller panels or fast-track gates. | | **C) Context is the best firewall.** Static filters fail; security must distinguish “reference” vs “leak” and “discussion” vs “exfiltration”. | **IF.SECURITY.CHECK + IF.SECURITY.DETECT** *(legacy: IF.ARMOUR + IF.YOLOGUARD)*
- CHECK: epistemic coherence checks (detective layer)
- DETECT: secret/relationship screening primitives | **Domain specificity.** Calibrated for concrete security surfaces (secrets/PII/prompt injection); generalizing to broader “harmful intent” is an open research vector. |