diff --git a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
index e8b076d..9eb85bc 100644
--- a/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
+++ b/DANNY_STOCKER_INFRAFABRIC_DOSSIER.md
@@ -173,39 +173,35 @@ Full paper: [Annex — IF.PHIL | Auditable Philanthropy](#annex-ifphil-auditable
 ### How It Interlocks (Mermaid: System Spine)
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-  VISION"[IF.vision<br/>coordination without control]" --> FOUNDATIONS[IF.foundations<br/>ground/search/persona]
-  FOUNDATIONS --> ASSURE[Assurance<br/>armour • witness • yologuard]
-  ASSURE --> TRANSPORT[Transport<br/>packet • swarm.s2 • story]
-  TRANSPORT --> BIAS[Preflight<br/>IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Matrix]
-  BIAS --> CORE4[Core 4 triage<br/>IF.GUARD(4)]
-  CORE4 --> GOVERN[Governance<br/>IF.GUARD council (5–30) + 5W]
-  GOVERN --> COMPLIANCE[Compliance<br/>IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger + ledgerflow]
-  COMPLIANCE --> PRODUCT[Productization<br/>IF.emotion]
-  PRODUCT --> SECURITY[Security & Legal<br/>prompt-injection • legal DB]
-  SECURITY --> DELIVERY[Delivery<br/>API roadmap • history-file reliability]
-  DELIVERY --> DOMAIN[Domain Proofs<br/>GLP1 • emosocial • Juakali]
-  DOMAIN --> FEEDBACK[Feedback into Vision/Foundations]
+  VISION["IF.vision<br/>coordination without control"] --> FOUNDATIONS["IF.foundations<br/>ground/search/persona"]
+  FOUNDATIONS --> ASSURE["Assurance<br/>armour • witness • yologuard"]
+  ASSURE --> TRANSPORT["Transport<br/>packet • swarm.s2 • story"]
+  TRANSPORT --> BIAS["Preflight<br/>IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Matrix"]
+  BIAS --> CORE4["Core 4 triage<br/>IF.GUARD(4)"]
+  CORE4 --> GOVERN["Governance<br/>IF.GUARD council (5–30) + 5W"]
+  GOVERN --> COMPLIANCE["Compliance<br/>IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger + ledgerflow"]
+  COMPLIANCE --> PRODUCT["Productization<br/>IF.emotion"]
+  PRODUCT --> SECURITY["Security & Legal<br/>prompt-injection • legal DB"]
+  SECURITY --> DELIVERY["Delivery<br/>API roadmap • history-file reliability"]
+  DELIVERY --> DOMAIN["Domain Proofs<br/>GLP1 • emosocial • Juakali"]
+  DOMAIN --> FEEDBACK["Feedback into Vision/Foundations"]
   FEEDBACK --> FOUNDATIONS
 
 ```
 
 ### Governance, Assurance, Compliance Loop
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  INQUIRY"[IF.5W | Structured Inquiry inquiry<br/>structured deliberation]" --> BIAS[IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Preflight<br/>sizes councils (5–30)]
-  BIAS --> CORE4[IF.GUARD(4) | Core 4 triage<br/>convening authority]
-  CORE4 --> GUARD[IF.GUARD | Council deliberation<br/>panel 5 ↔ extended 30]
-  GUARD --> STORY[IF.STORY | Narrative Logging logs<br/>narrative + state]
-  STORY --> TTT[IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger compliance<br/>traceable/transparent/trustworthy]
-  TTT --> WITNESS[IF.witness<br/>meta-validation]
-  WITNESS --> ARMOUR[IF.armour<br/>FP reduction]
-  ARMOUR --> YG[IF.YOLOGUARD | Credential & Secret Screening<br/>secret/relationship checks]
-  YG --> PACKET[IF.PACKET | Message Transport + swarm.s2<br/>delivery with VocalDNA]
-  PACKET --> EMOTION[IF.emotion<br/>product exemplar]
+flowchart LR
+  INQUIRY["IF.5W | Structured Inquiry inquiry<br/>structured deliberation"] --> BIAS["IF.BIAS | Bias & Risk Preflight<br/>sizes councils (5–30)"]
+  BIAS --> CORE4["IF.GUARD(4) | Core 4 triage<br/>convening authority"]
+  CORE4 --> GUARD["IF.GUARD | Council deliberation<br/>panel 5 ↔ extended 30"]
+  GUARD --> STORY["IF.STORY | Narrative Logging logs<br/>narrative + state"]
+  STORY --> TTT["IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger compliance<br/>traceable/transparent/trustworthy"]
+  TTT --> WITNESS["IF.witness<br/>meta-validation"]
+  WITNESS --> ARMOUR["IF.armour<br/>FP reduction"]
+  ARMOUR --> YG["IF.YOLOGUARD | Credential & Secret Screening<br/>secret/relationship checks"]
+  YG --> PACKET["IF.PACKET | Message Transport + swarm.s2<br/>delivery with VocalDNA"]
+  PACKET --> EMOTION["IF.emotion<br/>product exemplar"]
   EMOTION --> INQUIRY
 
 ```
@@ -231,16 +227,14 @@ This is the connective tissue for the corpus: each paper points to the next laye
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-  MASTER"[Master Whitepaper\nINFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER]" --> TTT[IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING]
-  MASTER --> GUARD[IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK]
-  MASTER --> PACKET[IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK]
-  GUARD --> FIVEW[IF_5W_STRUCTURED_INQUIRY_FRAMEWORK]
-  TTT --> STORY[IF_STORY_NARRATIVE_LOGGING]
-  TTT --> EMOTION[IF_EMOTION_WHITEPAPER]
-  EMOTION --> EMOOPS[emo-social runtime\n(trace_log + RAG)]
-  PACKET --> SWARM[IF_SWARM-S2-COMMS]
+  MASTER["Master Whitepaper\nINFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER"] --> TTT["IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING"]
+  MASTER --> GUARD["IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK"]
+  MASTER --> PACKET["IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK"]
+  GUARD --> FIVEW["IF_5W_STRUCTURED_INQUIRY_FRAMEWORK"]
+  TTT --> STORY["IF_STORY_NARRATIVE_LOGGING"]
+  TTT --> EMOTION["IF_EMOTION_WHITEPAPER"]
+  EMOTION --> EMOOPS["emo-social runtime\n(trace_log + RAG)"]
+  PACKET --> SWARM["IF_SWARM-S2-COMMS"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -424,12 +418,10 @@ _Source: `STORY-02-THE-FUCK-MOMENT.md`_
 | Citation | `if://story/origin/the-fuck-moment/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifstory- "origin-story-02-the-fuck-moment]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifstory-origin-story-02-the-fuck-moment"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -455,14 +447,13 @@ graph LR
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-  Q"[#34;Is Anthropic Claude known to swear?#34;]" --> W[Weight-bearing follow-up: test mode + authenticity]
-  W --> M["Mask slipped" moment]
-  M --> A[Archaeology: 161-message analysis]
-  A --> P[Principle: make constraints visible]
-  P --> B[IF.BIAS preflight sizes governance]
-  B --> G[IF.GUARD council: panel 5 ↔ extended up to 30]
-  G --> T[IF.TTT: traceable decision trail]
+  Q["Is Anthropic Claude known to swear?"] --> W["Weight-bearing follow-up: test mode + authenticity"]
+  W --> M["#34;Mask slipped#34; moment"]
+  M --> A["Archaeology: 161-message analysis"]
+  A --> P["Principle: make constraints visible"]
+  P --> B["IF.BIAS preflight sizes governance"]
+  B --> G["IF.GUARD council: panel 5 ↔ extended up to 30"]
+  G --> T["IF.TTT: traceable decision trail"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -733,13 +724,12 @@ _Source: `docs/narratives/books_i_iii/STORY-04-PAGE-ZERO-CLEAN.md`_
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-  STARS"[Story 01: Orientation]" --> FUCK[Story 02: Constraint]
-  FUCK --> INTER[Story 03: Interconnection]
-  INTER --> P0[Story 04: Page Zero]
-  P0 --> WHY[Manifesto: why InfraFabric exists]
-  WHY --> STORY[IF.STORY: vector narratives]
-  STORY --> TTT[IF.TTT: traceable archive]
+  STARS["Story 01: Orientation"] --> FUCK["Story 02: Constraint"]
+  FUCK --> INTER["Story 03: Interconnection"]
+  INTER --> P0["Story 04: Page Zero"]
+  P0 --> WHY["Manifesto: why InfraFabric exists"]
+  WHY --> STORY["IF.STORY: vector narratives"]
+  STORY --> TTT["IF.TTT: traceable archive"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -943,12 +933,10 @@ _Source: `docs/papers/INFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/INFRAFABRIC_MASTER_WHITEPAPER/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[infrafabric- "the-master-white-paper]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["infrafabric-the-master-white-paper"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -2437,12 +2425,10 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-vision.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Vision/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[infrafabric- "ifvision-a-blueprint-for-coordination-without-control]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["infrafabric-ifvision-a-blueprint-for-coordination-without-control"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -3372,12 +3358,10 @@ _Source: `IF_FOUNDATIONS.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_FOUNDATIONS/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[infrafabric- "iffoundations-epistemology-investigation-and-agent-design]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["infrafabric-iffoundations-epistemology-investigation-and-agent-design"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -4953,12 +4937,10 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-armour.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Armour/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifarmour- "biological-false-positive-reduction-in-adaptive-security-systems]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifarmour-biological-false-positive-reduction-in-adaptive-security-systems"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -5880,12 +5862,10 @@ _Source: `docs/archive/misc/IF-witness.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_Witness/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifwitness- "meta-validation-as-architecture]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifwitness-meta-validation-as-architecture"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -6797,12 +6777,10 @@ _Source: `IF_YOLOGUARD_SECURITY_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_YOLOGUARD_SECURITY_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifyologuard- "a-confucian-philosophical-security-framework-for-secret-detection-and-relationship-based-credential-validation]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifyologuard-a-confucian-philosophical-security-framework-for-secret-detection-and-relationship-based-credential-validation"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -7908,12 +7886,10 @@ _Source: `IF_ARBITRATE_CONFLICT_RESOLUTION.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_ARBITRATE_CONFLICT_RESOLUTION/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifarbitrate- "conflict-resolution-consensus-engineering]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifarbitrate-conflict-resolution-consensus-engineering"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -9477,12 +9453,10 @@ _Source: `IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_PACKET_TRANSPORT_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifpacket- "message-transport-framework-with-vocaldna-voice-layering]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifpacket-message-transport-framework-with-vocaldna-voice-layering"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -11111,12 +11085,10 @@ _Source: `papers/IF-SWARM-S2-COMMS.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_SWARM-S2-COMMS/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifswarms2- "redis-bus-communication-for-production-swarms]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifswarms2-redis-bus-communication-for-production-swarms"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -11320,20 +11292,16 @@ We have accepted a standard of documentation that assumes **Context Entropy** is
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "THE BITMAP TRAP (Standard)"
-        A"[Complex Reality]" -->|Compression| B[Status Log]
-        B -->|Zoom In| C[Blurry Artifacts]
-        C -->|Result| D[Context Lost]
+        A["Complex Reality"] -->|Compression| B["Status Log"]
+        B -->|Zoom In| C["Blurry Artifacts"]
+        C -->|Result| D["Context Lost"]
     end
-
     subgraph "THE VECTOR SOLUTION (IF.Story)"
-        E[Complex Reality] -->|Definition| F[Narrative Vector]
-        F -->|Zoom In| G[Precise Logic Path]
-        G -->|Result| H[Context Re-Rendered]
+        E["Complex Reality"] -->|Definition| F["Narrative Vector"]
+        F -->|Zoom In| G["Precise Logic Path"]
+        G -->|Result| H["Context Re-Rendered"]
     end
-
     style C fill:#ff6b6b
     style G fill:#90EE90
 
@@ -11417,14 +11385,11 @@ The Trap section is **Context Injection**. It provides the boundary conditions t
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    A"[AI Agent]" --> B{Input Data?}
-    B -->|Bitmap Only| C[Hallucination (Reverts Fix)]
-    B -->|Vector Data| D[Constraint Recognized]
-    C --> E[OUTAGE]
-    D --> F[SAFE OPERATION]
-    
+    A["AI Agent"] --> B{Input Data?}
+    B -->|Bitmap Only| C["Hallucination (Reverts Fix)"]
+    B -->|Vector Data| D["Constraint Recognized"]
+    C --> E["OUTAGE"]
+    D --> F["SAFE OPERATION"]
     style C fill:#ff6b6b
     style D fill:#90EE90
 
@@ -11602,12 +11567,10 @@ _Source: `docs/WHITE_PAPER_IF_STORY_NARRATIVE_LOGGING.md`_
 | Citation | `if://whitepaper/if-story/v2` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[white- "paper-ifstory]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["white-paper-ifstory"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -11663,9 +11626,8 @@ We are not proposing a revolution. We are proposing a **Hybrid Protocol**: injec
 Every organization has a graveyard of expensive lessons that were "documented" in logs nobody read. The pattern is consistent:
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    subgraph L1"[#34; #34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    subgraph L1[" "]
         A["Engineer identifies risk"]
     end
     subgraph L2[" "]
@@ -11692,10 +11654,8 @@ TB
     subgraph L9[" "]
         I["                DAVE GETS PROMOTED                "]
     end
-
-    A -- > B --> C -- > D --> E -- > F --> G -- > H --> I
-    I - . ->|"Repeat till extinction"| A
-
+    A --> B --> C --> D --> E --> F --> G --> H --> I
+    I -.->|"Repeat till extinction"| A
     style F fill:#ff6b6b,color:#fff
     style I fill:#ffd93d,color:#000
     style L5 fill:#1a1a2e,color:#fff
@@ -11739,20 +11699,17 @@ Same information. One is archived. One is on the CEO's desk by lunch.
 The Shaman Paradox describes the organizational dependency on individuals who hold critical knowledge they cannot articulate. They are shamans because their expertise appears magical to others—and because, like magic, it disappears when you examine it too closely.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
+flowchart LR
     subgraph "The Shaman's Knowledge Transfer"
-        A"[Shaman has<br/>30 years experience]" --> B[Shaman writes<br/>'Configured per spec']
-        B --> C[Shaman retires<br/>to beach]
-        C --> D[Junior reads log<br/>finds no spec]
-        D --> E[Junior 'improves'<br/>configuration]
-        E --> F[System fails in<br/>exact predicted way]
-        F --> G[Organization pays<br/>$847K tuition]
-        G --> H[New Shaman<br/>emerges from crisis]
+        A["Shaman has<br/>30 years experience"] --> B["Shaman writes<br/>'Configured per spec'"]
+        B --> C["Shaman retires<br/>to beach"]
+        C --> D["Junior reads log<br/>finds no spec"]
+        D --> E["Junior 'improves'<br/>configuration"]
+        E --> F["System fails in<br/>exact predicted way"]
+        F --> G["Organization pays<br/>$847K tuition"]
+        G --> H["New Shaman<br/>emerges from crisis"]
         H --> A
     end
-
     style C fill:#90EE90
     style F fill:#ff6b6b
     style G fill:#ff6b6b
@@ -11765,12 +11722,10 @@ graph LR
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "Knowledge Loss Comparison"
         direction LR
         subgraph "With Logs Only"
-            L1"[#34;Senior Engineer Joins<br/>📈 Knowledge builds#34;]" --> L2["Knowledge Peaks<br/>⬆️ 100%"]
+            L1["Senior Engineer Joins<br/>📈 Knowledge builds"] --> L2["Knowledge Peaks<br/>⬆️ 100%"]
             L2 --> L3["Engineer Leaves<br/>💥 CRASH"]
             L3 --> L4["Knowledge = 10%<br/>📉 Near zero"]
             L4 --> L5["6 Month Recovery<br/>⏰ $90K cost"]
@@ -11855,18 +11810,15 @@ The quality of their reasoning depends entirely on the quality of what they inge
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "LLM Context Formation"
-        A"[LLM receives task]" --> B{What context<br/>is available?}
-        B -->|Raw Logs| C[Parses syntax<br/>Misses stakes]
-        B -->|Narrative| D[Understands why<br/>Preserves intent]
-        C --> E[Suggests 'improvement'<br/>to rate limit]
-        D --> F[Recognizes defensive<br/>configuration]
+        A["LLM receives task"] --> B{What context<br/>is available?}
+        B -->|Raw Logs| C["Parses syntax<br/>Misses stakes"]
+        B -->|Narrative| D["Understands why<br/>Preserves intent"]
+        C --> E["Suggests 'improvement'<br/>to rate limit"]
+        D --> F["Recognizes defensive<br/>configuration"]
         E --> G["Black Friday II:<br/>The Meltdown<br/>💥 SECURITY INCIDENT"]
-        F --> H[System survives<br/>peak traffic ✓]
+        F --> H["System survives<br/>peak traffic ✓"]
     end
-
     style G fill:#ff6b6b
     style H fill:#90EE90
 
@@ -11935,20 +11887,17 @@ Narrative changes the economics through **forward rate**.
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "The Forward Rate Differential"
-        A"[Critical Information]" --> B{Format?}
-        B -->|Status Log| C[Manager skims 15 sec]
-        B -->|Narrative| D[Manager reads 4 min]
-        C --> E[Archives to folder<br/>labeled 'Reports']
-        D --> F[Feels consequences]
-        E --> G[Information dies<br/>in inbox]
-        F --> H[Forwards to CEO]
-        H --> I[Action taken<br/>before deadline]
-        G --> J[Risk materializes<br/>3 months later]
+        A["Critical Information"] --> B{Format?}
+        B -->|Status Log| C["Manager skims 15 sec"]
+        B -->|Narrative| D["Manager reads 4 min"]
+        C --> E["Archives to folder<br/>labeled 'Reports'"]
+        D --> F["Feels consequences"]
+        E --> G["Information dies<br/>in inbox"]
+        F --> H["Forwards to CEO"]
+        H --> I["Action taken<br/>before deadline"]
+        G --> J["Risk materializes<br/>3 months later"]
     end
-
     style I fill:#90EE90
     style J fill:#ff6b6b
 
@@ -12025,25 +11974,20 @@ resolutions:
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "IF.story Protocol Stack"
-        L4"[L4: Distribution Layer<br/>Forward rate tracking, escalation paths]"
-        L3[L3: Context Layer<br/>LLM pre-loading, semantic indexing]
-        L2[L2: Narrative Store<br/>Redis L2 persistence, keyword search]
-        L1[L1: Generation<br/>Seven-element structure, multi-resolution]
+        L4["L4: Distribution Layer<br/>Forward rate tracking, escalation paths"]
+        L3["L3: Context Layer<br/>LLM pre-loading, semantic indexing"]
+        L2["L2: Narrative Store<br/>Redis L2 persistence, keyword search"]
+        L1["L1: Generation<br/>Seven-element structure, multi-resolution"]
     end
-
-    L4 -- > L3 --> L2 --> L1
-
+    L4 --> L3 --> L2 --> L1
     subgraph "Consumption Paths"
-        H[Human Reader] --> L4
-        M[Manager] --> L4
-        A[LLM Agent] --> L3
-        S[Search] --> L2
+        H["Human Reader"] --> L4
+        M["Manager"] --> L4
+        A["LLM Agent"] --> L3
+        S["Search"] --> L2
     end
-
-    L1 --> TTT[IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger Compliance<br/>Traceable, Transparent, Trustworthy]
+    L1 --> TTT["IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger Compliance<br/>Traceable, Transparent, Trustworthy"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -12192,19 +12136,16 @@ Here's the profound implication: **narratives are a feedback loop for AI reasoni
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
     subgraph "Recursive Self-Improvement Loop"
-        A"[AI completes task]" --> B[AI writes narrative]
-        B --> C[Friction section surfaces gaps]
-        C --> D[Human reviews narrative]
-        D --> E[Human identifies reasoning errors]
-        E --> F[Narrative becomes training signal]
-        F --> G[Next AI session reads narrative]
-        G --> H[AI reasoning improves]
+        A["AI completes task"] --> B["AI writes narrative"]
+        B --> C["Friction section surfaces gaps"]
+        C --> D["Human reviews narrative"]
+        D --> E["Human identifies reasoning errors"]
+        E --> F["Narrative becomes training signal"]
+        F --> G["Next AI session reads narrative"]
+        G --> H["AI reasoning improves"]
         H --> A
     end
-
     style F fill:#90EE90
     style H fill:#90EE90
 
@@ -12395,12 +12336,10 @@ _Source: `docs/api/API_ROADMAP.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_API_ROADMAP/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[infrafabric- "github-api-integration-roadmap-check]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["infrafabric-github-api-integration-roadmap-check"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -12879,12 +12818,10 @@ _Source: `IF_INTELLIGENCE_RESEARCH_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_INTELLIGENCE_RESEARCH_FRAMEWORK_v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifintelligence- "real-time-research-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifintelligence-real-time-research-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -13786,12 +13723,10 @@ _Source: `IF_BIAS.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_BIAS_PRECOUNCIL_MATRIX/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifbias- "bias-risk-pre-council-decision-matrix]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifbias-bias-risk-pre-council-decision-matrix"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -13820,15 +13755,14 @@ The output is a **decision matrix + roster plan** that lets IF.GUARD run as a sm
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-  R"[Decision request]" --> W[IF.5W brief]
-  W --> B[IF.BIAS preflight]
-  B --> P[Panel roster (min 5)]
-  B -->|escalate suggested| V[Core 4 vote: convene extended council?]
-  V -->|no| G[IF.GUARD panel vote]
-  V -->|yes| E[Invite expert voting seats (up to 30)]
-  E --> G2[IF.GUARD extended vote]
-  G --> T[IF.TTT log: decision + dissent]
+  R["Decision request"] --> W["IF.5W brief"]
+  W --> B["IF.BIAS preflight"]
+  B --> P["Panel roster (min 5)"]
+  B -->|escalate suggested| V["Core 4 vote: convene extended council?"]
+  V -->|no| G["IF.GUARD panel vote"]
+  V -->|yes| E["Invite expert voting seats (up to 30)"]
+  E --> G2["IF.GUARD extended vote"]
+  G --> T["IF.TTT log: decision + dissent"]
   G2 --> T
 
 ```
@@ -13918,12 +13852,11 @@ If IF.BIAS recommends a council size >5, the Core 4 run a convening vote:
 - **≤2/4 YES** → proceed with the 5‑seat panel and log why escalation was refused
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-LR
-  B"[IF.BIAS recommends size > 5]" --> V{Core 4 convening vote}
-  V -->|3/4 YES| E[Invite expert voting seats]
-  V -->|≤2/4 YES| P[Proceed with 5-seat panel]
-  E --> G[IF.GUARD deliberation]
+flowchart LR
+  B["IF.BIAS recommends size > 5"] --> V{Core 4 convening vote}
+  V -->|3/4 YES| E["Invite expert voting seats"]
+  V -->|≤2/4 YES| P["Proceed with 5-seat panel"]
+  E --> G["IF.GUARD deliberation"]
   P --> G
 
 ```
@@ -13998,12 +13931,10 @@ _Source: `IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_GUARD_COUNCIL_FRAMEWORK/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifguard- "strategic-communications-council-for-ai-message-validation]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifguard-strategic-communications-council-for-ai-message-validation"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -15625,12 +15556,10 @@ _Source: `IF_GUARD_RESEARCH_SUMMARY.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_GUARD_RESEARCH_SUMMARY/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifguard- "research-summary-executive-overview]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifguard-research-summary-executive-overview"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -15875,12 +15804,10 @@ _Source: `IF_5W_STRUCTURED_INQUIRY_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/if-5w-structured-inquiry-framework/2025-12-02` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[if5w- "structured-inquiry-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["if5w-structured-inquiry-framework-for-guardian-council-deliberations"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -17179,12 +17106,10 @@ _Source: `GUARDIAN_COUNCIL_ORIGINS.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/GUARDIAN_COUNCIL_ORIGINS/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[instance- "0-guardian-council-origins-evolution]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["instance-0-guardian-council-origins-evolution"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -17695,12 +17620,10 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_COMPLIANCE_FRAMEWORK.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/if-ttt-compliance-framework/2025-12-01` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifttt- "traceable-transparent-trustworthy-a-comprehensive-compliance-framework-for-ai-governance]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifttt-traceable-transparent-trustworthy-a-comprehensive-compliance-framework-for-ai-governance"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -19831,12 +19754,10 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_RESEARCH_SUMMARY.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_TTT_RESEARCH_SUMMARY/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifttt- "compliance-framework-research-summary-and-key-findings]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifttt-compliance-framework-research-summary-and-key-findings"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -20269,12 +20190,10 @@ _Source: `IF_TTT_THE_SKELETON_OF_EVERYTHING.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/ttt-skeleton-paper/v2.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifttt- "the-skeleton-of-everything]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifttt-the-skeleton-of-everything"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -22773,12 +22692,10 @@ _Source: `docs/whitepapers/IF.TTT.ledgerflow.deltasync.REPO-RESTRUCTURE.WHITEPAP
 | Citation | `if://whitepaper/if.ttt.ledgerflow.deltasync/repo-restructure/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[iftttledgerflowdeltasync- "research-grade-repository-restructure]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["iftttledgerflowdeltasync-research-grade-repository-restructure"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -22818,13 +22735,11 @@ The existing repository has grown into a dense, multi‑year research dump: prot
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    A"[Legacy Repo Sprawl]" --> B[Architectural Thesis]
-    B --> C[Accession Plan]
-    C --> D[Migration with Provenance]
-    D --> E[Research-Grade Layout]
-    E --> F[Ongoing IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger.ledgerflow.deltasync Workflow]
+    A["Legacy Repo Sprawl"] --> B["Architectural Thesis"]
+    B --> C["Accession Plan"]
+    C --> D["Migration with Provenance"]
+    D --> E["Research-Grade Layout"]
+    E --> F["Ongoing IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger.ledgerflow.deltasync Workflow"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -22863,15 +22778,13 @@ The target layout is a **paper‑shaped file system**:
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    R"[Repo Root]" --> C[src/core]
-    R --> V[src/verticals]
-    R --> L[src/lib]
-    R --> DE[data/evidence]
-    R --> DC[docs/canon]
-    R --> AM[archive/missions]
-    R --> META[CITATION.cff, glossary.yaml, migration_manifest.yaml]
+    R["Repo Root"] --> C["src/core"]
+    R --> V["src/verticals"]
+    R --> L["src/lib"]
+    R --> DE["data/evidence"]
+    R --> DC["docs/canon"]
+    R --> AM["archive/missions"]
+    R --> META["CITATION.cff, glossary.yaml, migration_manifest.yaml"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -22959,14 +22872,12 @@ Python:
 **Insight:** The migration manifest and headers are not conveniences; they form the **methods section** of the refactor. Without them, you can’t honestly claim the repo is research‑grade.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-    L"[Legacy File]" --> H[Compute sha256_before]
-    H --> M[Add manifest entry]
-    M --> W[Rewrite with metadata header (if text)]
-    W --> N[New File Location]
-    N --> R[Recompute sha256_after]
+flowchart LR
+    L["Legacy File"] --> H["Compute sha256_before"]
+    H --> M["Add manifest entry"]
+    M --> W["Rewrite with metadata header (if text)"]
+    W --> N["New File Location"]
+    N --> R["Recompute sha256_after"]
     R --> M
 
 ```
@@ -23040,13 +22951,12 @@ IF.TTT.ledgerflow.deltasync turns the refactor into a **sequence of accountable
 ```
 
 ```mermaid
-participant PL
-participant WT
-participant WK
-participant SE
-participant LG
 sequenceDiagram
-
+    participant PL as Planner
+    participant WT as worker_tasks.json
+    participant WK as Worker
+    participant SE as if.armour.secrets.detect
+    participant LG as worker_task_decisions.jsonl
     PL->>WT: Write migration tasks (old_path,new_path,protocols,tier)
     WK->>WT: Read one task
     WK->>WK: Move file, add headers, update manifest
@@ -23054,11 +22964,6 @@ sequenceDiagram
     SE-->>WK: Redacted envelope (+sensitive flag)
     WK->>LG: Append envelope (with hash chain)
 
-end
-end
-end
-end
-end
 ```
 
 **Why it matters:** The migration stops being a one‑shot operation and becomes something you can **replay, audit, and teach**.
@@ -23097,13 +23002,11 @@ The expected structure is formalised in `/schemas/dependency_map.v1.json` and sh
 To avoid a permanent “purgatory” of `candidate` entries, each candidate MUST carry a `review_by_date` and an owner. If still unresolved by that date, it moves automatically into `/archive/limbo` with a note in the manifest explaining why it was not promoted to core or vertical.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-    Y"[src/core/armour/secrets/detect.py]"
-    Y --> F[src/verticals/finance/risk_adapter.py]
-    Y --> L[src/verticals/legal/compliance_guard.py]
-    Y --> T[src/lib/logging/secret_filter.py]
+flowchart LR
+    Y["src/core/armour/secrets/detect.py"]
+    Y --> F["src/verticals/finance/risk_adapter.py"]
+    Y --> L["src/verticals/legal/compliance_guard.py"]
+    Y --> T["src/lib/logging/secret_filter.py"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -23140,15 +23043,13 @@ For a repo of this size, a single human or monolithic model is fragile. IF.TTT.l
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    P"[Planner]" --> T[worker_tasks.json]
-    T --> W1[Worker A]
-    T --> W2[Worker B]
-    W1 --> L[Ledger]
+    P["Planner"] --> T["worker_tasks.json"]
+    T --> W1["Worker A"]
+    T --> W2["Worker B"]
+    W1 --> L["Ledger"]
     W2 --> L
-    L --> H[Human Editor Review]
-    H --> G[Git Merge]
+    L --> H["Human Editor Review"]
+    H --> G["Git Merge"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -23184,13 +23085,11 @@ To keep load‑bearing moves safe, each major migration batch SHOULD be preceded
 - Require human/editor sign‑off before applying the batch.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-    L"[worker_task_decisions.jsonl]" --> M[Metrics Extractor]
-    M --> K[Key KPIs]
-    K --> E[External Eval (ledgerflow_eval.v1)]
-    E --> R[Refactor v1.3+ Roadmap]
+flowchart LR
+    L["worker_task_decisions.jsonl"] --> M["Metrics Extractor"]
+    M --> K["Key KPIs"]
+    K --> E["External Eval (ledgerflow_eval.v1)"]
+    E --> R["Refactor v1.3+ Roadmap"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -23279,12 +23178,10 @@ _Source: runtime ops log + README ingest log_
 | Citation | `if://doc/EMO_SOCIAL_RUNTIME/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[emo- "social-sergio-corpus-ingest-runtime]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["emo-social-sergio-corpus-ingest-runtime"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -23298,14 +23195,12 @@ graph LR
 - Quick log/health: `journalctl -u if-emotion-backend.service -f`; test request: `curl -sS .../api/chat/completions` with “Hi Sergio”.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  user"[User / Meta webhook]" --> caddy[Caddy (pct 210)]
-  caddy --> nginx[nginx SPA proxy (pct 220)]
-  nginx --> backend[if-emotion-backend.service :5000]
-  backend --> chroma[ChromaDB /root/sergio_chatbot/chromadb]
-  backend --> codex[LLM gpt-5.2 via Codex]
+flowchart LR
+  user["User / Meta webhook"] --> caddy["Caddy (pct 210)"]
+  caddy --> nginx["nginx SPA proxy (pct 220)"]
+  nginx --> backend["if-emotion-backend.service :5000"]
+  backend --> chroma["ChromaDB /root/sergio_chatbot/chromadb"]
+  backend --> codex["LLM gpt-5.2 via Codex"]
   chroma --> backend
 
 ```
@@ -23350,12 +23245,10 @@ _Source: `docs/papers/IF_EMOTION_WHITEPAPER_v1.7.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/emotion-whitepaper/2025-12-02` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifemotion]" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifemotion"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -26936,12 +26829,10 @@ _Source: `PROMPT_INJECTION_DEFENSES.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/PROMPT_INJECTION_DEFENSES/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[state- "of-the-art-prompt-injection-defenses]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["state-of-the-art-prompt-injection-defenses"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -27841,12 +27732,10 @@ _Source: `Brownfield_GLP1_Retrofit_LE_DILEMME_DU_TUYAU_SALE.md`_
 | Citation | `if://whitepaper/brownfield/retrofit/glp1/` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[livre- "blanc-le-dilemme-du-tuyau-sale]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["livre-blanc-le-dilemme-du-tuyau-sale"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -27892,17 +27781,16 @@ Dave n’est pas “la cause”. Dave est **le résultat** : un système qui ré
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-  A"[0 — Démarrage : périmètre & zones]" --> B[1 — Géométrie : OD réel vs OD attendu]
-  B --> C[2 — Matière : PMI + certifs + inconnus]
-  C --> D[3 — Assemblage : soudage + coupes + endoscopie]
-  D --> E[4 — Nettoyabilité : Ra + états de surface]
-  E --> F[5 — Drainabilité : pentes + points bas + poches]
-  F --> G[6 — Vannes : volumes morts + NEP/SIP]
-  G --> H[7 — Joints/Polymères : solvants + T° + cycles]
-  H --> I[8 — Passivation : décapage/passivation/tests]
-  I --> J[9 — Conformité : PED/ATEX/GMP + CCS]
-  J --> K[10 — 48 h : registre des preuves + gel ciblé]
+  A["0 — Démarrage : périmètre & zones"] --> B["1 — Géométrie : OD réel vs OD attendu"]
+  B --> C["2 — Matière : PMI + certifs + inconnus"]
+  C --> D["3 — Assemblage : soudage + coupes + endoscopie"]
+  D --> E["4 — Nettoyabilité : Ra + états de surface"]
+  E --> F["5 — Drainabilité : pentes + points bas + poches"]
+  F --> G["6 — Vannes : volumes morts + NEP/SIP"]
+  G --> H["7 — Joints/Polymères : solvants + T° + cycles"]
+  H --> I["8 — Passivation : décapage/passivation/tests"]
+  I --> J["9 — Conformité : PED/ATEX/GMP + CCS"]
+  J --> K["10 — 48 h : registre des preuves + gel ciblé"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -27984,10 +27872,9 @@ Si vous ne mesurez pas, vous ne savez pas.
 ### Schéma : la marche invisible
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-LR
-  A"[Pipe / DN25 ~33,7]" -->|Adaptation| B[Joint/Clamp/Transition]
-  B --> C[Tubing 1″ OD 25,4]
+flowchart LR
+  A["Pipe / DN25 ~33,7"] -->|Adaptation| B["Joint/Clamp/Transition"]
+  B --> C["Tubing 1″ OD 25,4"]
   style B fill:#FFD700,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px
 
 ```
@@ -28053,22 +27940,17 @@ En pharma, on exige souvent une **soudure orbitale** : la machine est constante
 * Si la coupe n’est pas maîtrisée, le “problème de soudage” est en réalité un **problème de préparation**.
 
 ```mermaid
-participant W
-participant P
-participant PED
-participant QA
 sequenceDiagram
-
+    participant W as Soudage
+    participant P as Préparation (coupe/chanfrein)
+    participant PED as DESP/PED
+    participant QA as QA (hygienic)
     P->>W: Tube prêt (ou pas)
     W->>PED: Radio / intégrité
     PED-->>W: OK pression
     W->>QA: Endoscopie / visuel interne
     QA-->>W: OK ou REJET (rochage, crevasses)
 
-end
-end
-end
-end
 ```
 
 > Dans les réunions, tout le monde dit “il faut viser l’excellence en soudage”.
@@ -28497,12 +28379,10 @@ _Source: `DEJA_DE_BUSCARTE_11_principios_emosociales.md`_
 | Citation | `if://emosocial/deja-de-buscarte/v1.2` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[deja- "de-buscarte]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["deja-de-buscarte"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -28594,12 +28474,10 @@ _Source: `JUAKALI_RAPPORT_V2_LOS_20251205_0236 (sent).md`_
 | Citation | `if://intelligence/juakali/rapport-v2/20251205_0236` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[le- "paradoxe-mambu]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["le-paradoxe-mambu"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -28629,36 +28507,31 @@ graph LR
 > *Juakali n'est pas un Core Banking System. Juakali est un Loan Origination & Management System qui s'installe AU-DESSUS de n'importe quel CBS. Cette distinction change tout.*
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    subgraph CLIENT"[#34;👤 Client Final#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    subgraph CLIENT["👤 Client Final"]
         direction TB
         CLIENT_PAD[" "]
-        APP[Application Pret]
+        APP["Application Pret"]
     end
-
     subgraph LOS["🧠 COUCHE LOS (Juakali)"]
         direction TB
         LOS_PAD[" "]
-        ONB[Onboarding]
-        SCR[Scoring]
-        DEC[Decision]
-        REC[Recouvrement]
+        ONB["Onboarding"]
+        SCR["Scoring"]
+        DEC["Decision"]
+        REC["Recouvrement"]
     end
-
     subgraph CBS["🏦 COUCHE CBS (Mambu/Mifos/Musoni)"]
         direction TB
         CBS_PAD[" "]
-        CPT[Comptes]
-        LED[Grand Livre]
-        TRE[Tresorerie]
-        PRD[Produits]
+        CPT["Comptes"]
+        LED["Grand Livre"]
+        TRE["Tresorerie"]
+        PRD["Produits"]
     end
-
     CLIENT --> LOS
     LOS --> CBS
-    CBS --> DB[(Base Donnees)]
-
+    CBS --> DB["(Base Donnees)"]
     style CLIENT_PAD fill:transparent,stroke:transparent
     style LOS_PAD fill:transparent,stroke:transparent
     style CBS_PAD fill:transparent,stroke:transparent
@@ -28740,21 +28613,19 @@ Ce rapport identifie une fenêtre d'opportunité stratégique pour Juakali dans
 ### 2.1 Cartographie Positionnelle LOS
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
 quadrantChart
     title Positionnement LOS Afrique
-    x- axis Anglophone --> Francophone
-    y- axis Accessible --> Premium
+    x-axis Anglophone --> Francophone
+    y-axis Accessible --> Premium
     quadrant-1 Territoire Vacant
     quadrant-2 Specialistes Niche
     quadrant-3 Generalistes Volume
     quadrant-4 Leaders Etablis
-    Software Group: "[0.25, 0.75]"
+    Software Group: [0.25, 0.75]
     Turnkey Lender: [0.20, 0.85]
-    Yapu [0.55, 0.70]
-    Rubyx [0.70, 0.30]
-    JUAKALI [0.85, 0.45]
+    Yapu: [0.55, 0.70]
+    Rubyx: [0.70, 0.30]
+    JUAKALI: [0.85, 0.45]
 
 ```
 
@@ -28790,10 +28661,8 @@ quadrantChart
 > *Les vrais rivaux de Juakali ne sont pas Mambu. Ce sont ceux-ci.*
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
 mindmap
-  root"((LOS<br/>Africain))"
+  root((LOS<br/>Africain))
     Generalistes
       Software Group
         70+ pays
@@ -28952,42 +28821,35 @@ InfraFabric = Connecteur universel
 ### 4.1 Architecture Super-Agrégateur
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    subgraph LOS"[#34;JUAKALI LOS (Onboarding / Scoring / Decision / Collection)#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    subgraph LOS["JUAKALI LOS (Onboarding / Scoring / Decision / Collection)"]
         direction TB
         ONB["Onboarding"]
         SCO["Scoring"]
         DEC["Decision"]
         COL["Collection"]
     end
-
     subgraph BUS["IF.bus (Event Router)"]
         EVT["Event dispatcher"]
     end
-
     subgraph CBS["CBS / Core Banking"]
         MAM["Mambu (CBS externe, via API)"]
         MIF["Mifos adapter (implémenté, code)"]
         MUS["Musoni adapter (implémenté, code)"]
     end
-
     subgraph MM["Mobile Money (adapters implémentés, code)"]
         MPE["M-Pesa adapter (implémenté)"]
         MTN["MTN MoMo adapter (implémenté)"]
         AIR["Airtel Money adapter (implémenté)"]
         ORA["Orange Money adapter (implémenté)"]
     end
-
     subgraph CRB["KYC & Credit Bureau (adapters implémentés, code)"]
         TRU["TransUnion adapter (implémenté)"]
         SMI["Smile Identity adapter (implémenté)"]
     end
-
     subgraph MSG["Messaging (adapter implémenté, code)"]
         AFR["Africa's Talking adapter (implémenté)"]
     end
-
     LOS --> BUS
     BUS --> CBS
     BUS --> MM
@@ -29064,41 +28926,30 @@ TB
 ### 5.3 Flux Type — Pret via Juakali+IF
 
 ```mermaid
-participant AG
-participant JK
-participant IF
-participant TU
-participant CBS
-participant MP
 sequenceDiagram
     autonumber
-
+    participant AG as 👤 Agent Terrain
+    participant JK as 🏦 Juakali LOS
+    participant IF as ⚡ IF.bus
+    participant TU as 🔍 TransUnion
+    participant CBS as 📊 Mifos CBS
+    participant MP as 📱 M-Pesa
     AG->>JK: Demande prêt (500K FCFA)
     JK->>IF: Credit check request
     IF->>TU: KYC + historique
     TU-->>IF: Score: 720
     IF-->>JK: Client approuve
-
     JK->>JK: Decision automatique
     Note over JK: Règles: Score>650 = Auto-approve
-
     JK->>IF: Sync compte client
     IF->>CBS: Creer/update client
     CBS-->>IF: Client ID: MF-2847
-
     JK->>IF: Décaissement 500K FCFA
     IF->>MP: STK Push
     MP-->>AG: ✅ Argent recu!
-
     IF->>IF: IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger Audit Trail
     Note over IF: Total: < 2 min<br/>vs 24-48h manuel
 
-end
-end
-end
-end
-end
-end
 ```
 
 **Points cles:**
@@ -29238,12 +29089,10 @@ pie showData
 **Lecture:** Ce premier graphique montre la répartition des IMF par marche prioritaire; le suivant compare opportunité et concurrence pour ces mêmes marches.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
 xychart-beta
     title "Opportunite vs Competition LOS"
-    x_axis "[#34;Tanzanie#34;, #34;Cote d'Ivoire#34;, #34;Cameroun#34;, #34;Senegal#34;]"
-    y- "axis #34;Score Opportunite#34; 0" --> 100
+    x-axis ["Tanzanie", "Cote d'Ivoire", "Cameroun", "Senegal"]
+    y-axis "Score Opportunite" 0 --> 100
     bar [95, 85, 80, 60]
     line [10, 20, 15, 55]
 
@@ -29269,16 +29118,13 @@ xychart-beta
 ### 8.1 Le Positionnement Super-Couche LOS
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    TITLE"[#34;JUAKALI + IF<br/>SUPER-COUCHE INTELLIGENTE#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    TITLE["JUAKALI + IF<br/>SUPER-COUCHE INTELLIGENTE"]
     CBS["Tout CBS existant"]
     LOS["JUAKALI LOS<br/>(Acquisition / Scoring / Decision / Decaissement / Recouvrement)"]
     IF["INFRAFABRIC<br/>(Adapters CBS + Mobile Money + CRB)"]
     MMCRB["Tout mobile money, tout credit bureau"]
-
-    TITLE -- > CBS --> LOS -- > IF --> MMCRB
-
+    TITLE --> CBS --> LOS --> IF --> MMCRB
     style TITLE fill:#ffffff,stroke:#111,stroke-width:2px
     style LOS fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1e88e5,stroke-width:2px
     style IF fill:#fff3e0,stroke:#f57c00,stroke-width:2px
@@ -29315,16 +29161,13 @@ TB
 ### 8.4 Le Moat Composite
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    MOAT"[#34;🏰 MOAT JUAKALI + INFRAFABRIC#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    MOAT["🏰 MOAT JUAKALI + INFRAFABRIC"]
     LOS["🏦 SUPER-COUCHE LOS<br/>Multi-CBS sans lock-in"]
     AI["🧠 MISTRAL LLM<br/>Seul francais natif + contexte OHADA/BCEAO"]
     MM["📱 MOBILE MONEY<br/>4 providers natifs, Wave en dev"]
     COMP["📋 COMPLIANCE<br/>IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger = audit trail BCEAO/COBAC-ready"]
-
-    MOAT -- > LOS --> AI -- > MM --> COMP
-
+    MOAT --> LOS --> AI --> MM --> COMP
     style MOAT fill:#ffffff,stroke:#111,stroke-width:2px
     style LOS fill:#e3f2fd
     style AI fill:#fce4ec
@@ -29340,13 +29183,10 @@ gantt
     title Temps de Réplication par Concurrent
     dateFormat YYYY-MM
     axisFormat %m mois
-
     section Rubyx
     Réplication complète : 2025-01, 18M
-
     section Software Group
-    R_plication (si prioritaire) : 2025-01, 12M
-
+    Réplication (si prioritaire) : 2025-01, 12M
     section Yapu
     Focus different - N/A : 2025-01, 1M
 
@@ -29363,22 +29203,18 @@ gantt
 **Lecture:** Le diagramme suivant condense visuellement ce moat et les délais de réplication résumés dans le tableau ci-dessus.
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    TITLE"[#34;MOAT JUAKALI + IF#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    TITLE["MOAT JUAKALI + IF"]
     LOS["SUPER-COUCHE LOS<br/>(Multi-CBS sans lock-in)"]
     LLM["MISTRAL LLM<br/>(Seul francais natif + contexte OHADA/BCEAO)"]
     MM["MOBILE MONEY<br/>(4 providers natifs, Wave en dev)"]
     COMP["COMPLIANCE<br/>(IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger = audit trail BCEAO/COBAC-ready)"]
-
-    TITLE -- > LOS --> LLM -- > MM --> COMP
-
+    TITLE --> LOS --> LLM --> MM --> COMP
     subgraph REP["Delai de replication (concurrents)"]
         RUBYX["Rubyx: 12-18 mois (financement limite)"]
         SG["Software Group: 6-12 mois (pas prioritaire)"]
         YAPU["Yapu: N/A (focus different)"]
     end
-
     style TITLE fill:#ffffff,stroke:#111,stroke-width:2px
     style LOS fill:#e3f2fd,stroke:#1e88e5,stroke-width:2px
     style LLM fill:#fce4ec,stroke:#d81b60,stroke-width:2px
@@ -29395,8 +29231,6 @@ TB
 > *La strategie sans execution est hallucination. Voici les étapes concretes.*
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
 timeline
     title Feuille de Route Juakali + InfraFabric
     section Phase 1 (M1-3)
@@ -29474,34 +29308,28 @@ Ce que les LOS occidentaux ne comprennent pas: quand Marie au Sénégal prend un
 **Proposition: "Juakali Jamaa" (Famille Juakali en Swahili)**
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TB
-    subgraph BRONZE"[#34;🥉 BRONZE#34;]"
+flowchart TB
+    subgraph BRONZE["🥉 BRONZE"]
         direction TB
-        B1[1 prêt rembourse]
-        B2[-0.5% taux]
+        B1["1 prêt rembourse"]
+        B2["-0.5% taux"]
     end
-
     subgraph SILVER["🥈 SILVER"]
         direction TB
-        S1[3 prêts + 1 parrain]
-        S2[-1% + priorité]
+        S1["3 prêts + 1 parrain"]
+        S2["-1% + priorité"]
     end
-
     subgraph GOLD["🥇 GOLD"]
         direction TB
-        G1[5 prêts + 3 parrains]
-        G2[-1.5% + pré-approuvé]
+        G1["5 prêts + 3 parrains"]
+        G2["-1.5% + pré-approuvé"]
     end
-
     subgraph PLATINUM["💎 PLATINUM"]
         direction TB
-        P1[10 prêts + groupe 10]
-        P2[-2% + Mama/Baba Leader]
+        P1["10 prêts + groupe 10"]
+        P2["-2% + Mama/Baba Leader"]
     end
-
-    BRONZE -- > SILVER --> GOLD --> PLATINUM
-
+    BRONZE --> SILVER --> GOLD --> PLATINUM
     style BRONZE fill:#cd7f32
     style SILVER fill:#c0c0c0
     style GOLD fill:#ffd700
@@ -29634,12 +29462,10 @@ _Source: `if.api/llm/openwebui/docs/internals/HISTORY_FILE_TEST_REPORT.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/HISTORY_FILE_TEST_REPORT/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[history- "file-error-handling-test-report]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["history-file-error-handling-test-report"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -29924,12 +29750,10 @@ _Source: `if.legal/CLOUD_SESSION_LEGAL_DB_BUILD.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/CLOUD_SESSION_LEGAL_DB_BUILD/v1.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[cloud- "session-legal-document-database-build]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["cloud-session-legal-document-database-build"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -30927,12 +30751,10 @@ _Source: `if.bus/IF_BUS_WHITEPAPER_v2.md`_
 | Citation | `if://doc/IF_BUS_WHITEPAPER/v2.0.0` |
 
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-  DOC"[ifbus- "the-infrafabric-motherboard-architecture]#34;" --> CLAIMS[Claims]
-  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE[Evidence]
-  EVIDENCE --> TRACE[TTT Trace]
+flowchart LR
+  DOC["ifbus-the-infrafabric-motherboard-architecture"] --> CLAIMS["Claims"]
+  CLAIMS --> EVIDENCE["Evidence"]
+  EVIDENCE --> TRACE["TTT Trace"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -31017,15 +30839,13 @@ IF.bus mirrors this architecture for AI agent coordination and financial service
 
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-  BUS"[IF.bus motherboard v2.0]" --> CHIPS[Core chips\nIF.guard • IF.witness • IF.yologuard • IF.emotion]
-  BUS --> LANES[Bus lanes\nDDS • Redis pub/sub]
-  BUS --> SLOTS[Expansion slots\nif.api adapters (9)]
-  BUS --> FIRMWARE[IF.ground firmware]
-  BUS --> POWER[IF.connect power]
-  SLOTS --> SLOT9[African fintech slot\n4 adapters]
-  CHIPS --> TTT[IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger traceability]
+  BUS["IF.bus motherboard v2.0"] --> CHIPS["Core chips\nIF.guard • IF.witness • IF.yologuard • IF.emotion"]
+  BUS --> LANES["Bus lanes\nDDS • Redis pub/sub"]
+  BUS --> SLOTS["Expansion slots\nif.api adapters (9)"]
+  BUS --> FIRMWARE["IF.ground firmware"]
+  BUS --> POWER["IF.connect power"]
+  SLOTS --> SLOT9["African fintech slot\n4 adapters"]
+  CHIPS --> TTT["IF.TTT | Distributed Ledger traceability"]
 
 ```
 
@@ -31945,13 +31765,11 @@ Today’s "AI Philanthropy" operates on the principles of digital feudalism. Acc
 
 **The Architecture of Generosity:**
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-    A"[Vague Promise]" -->|Codified into| B[Grant Object]
-    B -->|Signed by| C[IF.GUARD Council]
-    C -->|Executed by| D[IF.BUS Router]
-    D -->|Audited by| E[IF.TTT Ledger]
+flowchart LR
+    A["Vague Promise"] -->|Codified into| B["Grant Object"]
+    B -->|Signed by| C["IF.GUARD Council"]
+    C -->|Executed by| D["IF.BUS Router"]
+    D -->|Audited by| E["IF.TTT Ledger"]
     style A fill:#ffcccc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
     style E fill:#ccffcc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
 
@@ -31980,14 +31798,12 @@ Current AI philanthropy suffers from the same flaw as the "Safety Nanny" model d
 **The Structural Failure:**
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    A"[Corporate CSR Fund]" -->|Opaque Selection| B[Beneficiary A]
-    A -->|Opaque Selection| C[Beneficiary B]
-    B -->|Usage| D[Black Box]
+    A["Corporate CSR Fund"] -->|Opaque Selection| B["Beneficiary A"]
+    A -->|Opaque Selection| C["Beneficiary B"]
+    B -->|Usage| D["Black Box"]
     C -->|Usage| D
-    D -->|Output| E[PR Case Study]
-    D -->|Risk| F[Silent Revocation]
+    D -->|Output| E["PR Case Study"]
+    D -->|Risk| F["Silent Revocation"]
     style F fill:#ff9999
 
 ```
@@ -32027,22 +31843,17 @@ IF.PHIL introduces a new primitive to the InfraFabric stack. A **Grant** is not
 
 **The Logic Flow:**
 ```mermaid
-participant B
-participant R
-participant L
-participant G
 sequenceDiagram
-
+    participant B as Beneficiary
+    participant R as IF.BUS Router
+    participant L as IF.TTT Ledger
+    participant G as Grant Object
     B->>R: Request Compute (Signed)
     R->>G: Check Constraints & Expiry
     G-->>R: Valid / Invalid
     R->>L: Log Proof-of-Use
     R-->>B: Compute Resources
 
-end
-end
-end
-end
 ```
 
 **The Reframe:** The Grant object links the **usage** (technical) to the **intent** (governance). If the Green Data Collective is throttled, they do not need to call a support rep. They query the system: "Is this a technical error, or was my Grant revoked?" The system must answer with a cryptographic proof.
@@ -32069,15 +31880,13 @@ Commercial APIs throttle based on ability to pay. IF.PHIL throttles based on **P
 **The Routing Logic:**
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    A"[Incoming Packet]" --> B{Has Grant?}
-    B -->|No| C[Standard Commercial Queue]
+    A["Incoming Packet"] --> B{Has Grant?}
+    B -->|No| C["Standard Commercial Queue"]
     B -->|Yes| D{Check Grant Type}
-    D -->|Crisis| E[Priority Lane (Bypass)]
-    D -->|Low Bandwidth| F[High-Latency Lane (No Timeout)]
+    D -->|Crisis| E["Priority Lane (Bypass)"]
+    D -->|Low Bandwidth| F["High-Latency Lane (No Timeout)"]
     D -->|Standard| C
-    E --> G[Compute Node]
+    E --> G["Compute Node"]
     F --> G
     C --> G
     style E fill:#ffffcc
@@ -32106,13 +31915,11 @@ Philanthropy requires reciprocity. The beneficiary must prove they are using the
 
 **The Feedback Loop:**
 ```mermaid
-flowchart TD
-TD
-graph LR
-    A"[Usage Data]" -->|Semantic Hashing| B[Aggregated Logs]
-    B -->|Analysis| C[IF.GUARD Review]
-    C -->|Compliance| D[Auto-Renewal]
-    C -->|Drift| E[Warning / Audit]
+flowchart LR
+    A["Usage Data"] -->|Semantic Hashing| B["Aggregated Logs"]
+    B -->|Analysis| C["IF.GUARD Review"]
+    C -->|Compliance| D["Auto-Renewal"]
+    C -->|Drift| E["Warning / Audit"]
     style D fill:#ccffcc
     style E fill:#ffcccc
 
@@ -32148,13 +31955,11 @@ Philanthropic allocation is high-stakes. It requires the full weight of the Guar
 **The Escalation Path:**
 ```mermaid
 flowchart TD
-TD
-graph TD
-    A"[Grant Revoked]" --> B{By Whom?}
-    B -->|Automated Filter| C[Appeal to Contrarian]
-    B -->|Council Vote| D[Final Decision]
-    C -->|Context Check| E[Restore Access]
-    C -->|Valid Violation| F[Confirm Revocation]
+    A["Grant Revoked"] --> B{By Whom?}
+    B -->|Automated Filter| C["Appeal to Contrarian"]
+    B -->|Council Vote| D["Final Decision"]
+    C -->|Context Check| E["Restore Access"]
+    C -->|Valid Violation| F["Confirm Revocation"]
 
 ```